LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

FIXDAL v ALBERT Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,753, CourtName: W ILLIAM B. CHANDLER III THE FAMILY COURT BUILDING, Plaintiff: FIXDAL, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018753, CourtCode: CC, Dolphin, Albert, Directors, Severance Agreements, Common Stock, Poison, Pill, Rights Plan, Counterclaim, Shares, Stockholders, Fiduciary Duty, Paragraph, Self-dealing, Owner, Bylaw Amendments, Admit, Dolphin Board, Shareholders, Unenforceability, Amendments, Allegations, Third-party Claim, Restructuring Agreement, Hvistendahl, Amended Complaint, Management, Times Relevant Hereto, Delaware, Exercise Price, Exchange Act, Delaware Corporation, Self-dealing Scheme, Beneficial Owner, Subsidiaries , ContentID: 120246279

Case Documents
1 2001-04-26 AMENDED STATUS QUO ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115610
4 pages
PDF
2 2001-04-26 LETTER OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114871
4 pages
PDF
3 2001-04-24 ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIM
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115138
17 pages
PDF
4 2001-03-28 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115139
19 pages
PDF
5 2001-03-22 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115140
16 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 5 documents , 60 pages
Price: $ 39.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . AMENDED STATUS QUO ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SUBSIDIARIES
CAUSING DOLPHIN
AGREEMENT
DIRECTORS
COURT
ALBERT
EMPLOYMENT
MANAGEMENT
PAYMENT
QUO ORDER
TRANSACTION
SELL
STOCK
COMPENSATION
CONSULTING
RETENTION
COUNSEL
MESSRS
AMEND
DEFENDANTS
REPRESENTATIVES
BUSINESS
EXCEEDS
PURCHASE
BYLAWS
ASSETS
PAY
CORPORATION PROPERTY
KIND WHATSOEVER
  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                   IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


JAN FIXDAL,

                    Plaintiff,         >>
             V.                        >      Civil Action No. 18753
                                       >                           I      i
MARTIN S. ALBERT, JULIUS C.            )                                  -
(PAT) DARDEN, and DOLPHIN              )                                  r-       .~.
INTERCONNECT SOLUTIONS,  )                                                L
INC., a Delaware corporation,          >>                                 %..
                    Defendants.        >                                  -..-
                                                                  . .     -_ d
                   AMENDED STATUS QUO ORDER

      This  .gb  &day of April, 2001, the Court having considered the

parties' joint: application to amend the status quo order regarding certain

matters relatmg to the Board of Directors of Dolphin Interconnect Solutions,

Inc. ("Dolphin") entered on April 9, 2001, and pending entry of this Court's

final judgment in this action:

      IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Martin S. Albert, Julius

C. (Pat) Darden, and Dolphin, each of their agents, employees,

representatives and all other persons acting in concert or participation with

any of  thern (including, without limitation, Jan Engebretsen and Yngvar

Hvistendahl), shall, without further Order of this Court, take no action out of



the ordinary course of Dolphin's business, including, but not limited, to the

following:

       1.     Causing Dolphin or any of its  subsid:iaries to engage in, enter

into, or agree to, whether directly or indirectly and whether in or more than

one transaction, any transaction, contract, or agreement, the value of which
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • AMENDED STATUS QUO ORDER
  • application to amend the status quo order regarding certain
  • matters relatmg to the Board of Directors of Dolphin Interconnect Solutions,
  • IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Martin S. Albert,
  • representatives and all other persons acting in concert or participation with
  • the ordinary course of Dolphin's business, including, but not limited, to the
  • Causing Dolphin or any of its subsid:iaries to engage in,
  • one transaction, any transaction, contract, or agreement, the value of which
  • exceeds ten thousand dollars, except as required in the ordinary
  • purchase or commit or agree to issue, sell, or purchase any stock, stock
  • options, warrants, securities or other interests in Dolphin or its subsidiaries;
  • repeal their bylaws or the Certificate of Incorporation;
  • agreement of merger, tender offer, restructuring, or recapitalization;
  • Causing Dolphin or any of its subsidiaries to declare or pay any
  • o-r any of its subsidiaries any corporation property, assets or records of any
  • position, responsibilities or compensation of the senior management, or
  • management level employee not currently affiliated with Dolphin,
  • into any employment agreement with any persons on behalf of Dolphin;
  • employment agreement, consulting agreement, management retention
  • Causing Dolphin or any of its subsidiaries to make payment to
  • upon receipt of appropriate undertakings by Messrs.
  • Causing Dolphin to employ or be represented by any counsel

  • 2 . LETTER OPINION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ALBERT
    QUO ORDER
    DOLPHIN
    MEETING
    SCHEDULING
    COUNSEL
    EXPEDITED SCHEDULING
    HARM
    DEPOSITION
    ESQUIRE
    WILMINGTON
    CONFERENCE
    REVISED ORDER
    PLAINTIFFS
    HVISTENDAHL
    BY-LAWS
    UNDERTAKINGS
    FEES
    LANGUAGE
    ATTORNEYS
    LITIGATION
    LANGUAGE DIRECTING
    PAY
    INDEPENDENT COUNSEL
    FLTURE
    ABORT
    DOLPHIN SHAREHOLDERS MEETING
    DECLINE
    PRECLUDE
    
                                                  C OURT   OF   C HANCERY
                                                           OF THE
                                                  STATE  OF   D ELAWARE
    
    
    W ILLIAM  B. CHANDLER  III                                                     THE FAMILY COURT
           CHANCELLOR                                                                    P.O. BOX 58  I
                                                                                 GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE
    
                                                     April 26, 2001
    
    
    
                BY FAXBD U.S. MAIL
    
                Bruce L. Silver-stein, Esquire
                Young Conaway  Stargatt & Taylor LLP
                Rodney Square North
                P.O. Box 391
                Wilmington, DE 19899-0391
    
                 Kenneth J. Nachbar, Esquire
                 Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnel1
                 1201 North Market Street
                 P.O. Box 1347
                 Wilmington, DE 19899-l 347
    
                                  Re: Fixdal v. Albert, et al.
                                      C. A. No. 18753
    
                 Dear Counsel :
    
                           This is my decision on the matters discussed at our office conference
    
                 held yesterday, April 25, 2001. Attached to this letter you will find copies of
    
                 the Revised Order Re Expedited Scheduling and the Amended Status Quo
    
                 Order.
    
    
    
    Fixdal v. Alberl., et al.
    C. A. No. 18753
    April 26,200l
    
            The parties  will note that I have signed the Revised Order Re
    
    Expedited Scheduling as submitted by the defendants. You will also note
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Bruce L. Silver-stein, Esquire
  • Wilmington, DE 19899-l 347
  • Dear Counsel:
  • This is my decision on the matters discussed at our office conference
  • The parties will note that I have signed the Revised Order Re
  • Expedited Scheduling as submitted by the defendants.
  • First, the Status Quo Order now applies to the counter-claim plaintiffs,
  • Jan Engebretsen and Yngvar Hvistendahl, as well as Messrs.
  • Mr. Fixdal is not an officer or director of Dolphin Interconnect
  • VII, Section 6 of Dolphin's By-Laws, the Company may advance the legal
  • Albert and Darden, assuming the Company determines
  • the appropriate undertakings contemplated by the Company's By-Laws.
  • the Status Quo Order does not include language directing
  • Dolphin to pay its attorneys.
  • independent counsel to conduct litigation at this stage of the proceedings
  • will be able to address claims for attorneys' fees in the near fLture.
  • the Status Quo Order does not include language that would
  • abort the Dolphin shareholders meeting presently scheduled
  • I decline to preclude this Meeting for two reasons.
  • see no harm that will come from simply holding the Meeting.
  • I[reemphasize that the deposition schedule with respect to
  • litigation, the Section 225 action, does not appear relevant.

  • 3 . ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIM

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DIRECTORS
    COUNTERCLAIM
    PARAGRAPH
    STOCKHOLDERS
    DEFENDANTS
    ALBERT
    ADMIT
    ALLEGATIONS
    THIRD-PARTY CLAIM
    RESTRUCTURING AGREEMENT
    MEMBERS
    HVISTENDAHL
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    PLAINTIFF
    SHARES
    AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
    RIGHTS PLAN
    MANAGEMENT
    DEFENDANTS RESPECTFULLY REFER
    RESPONSIVE PLEADING
    INTERCONNECT SOLUTIONS
    ASSERT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
    THIRD BOARD MEMBER
    SHARES OUTSTANDING
    SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    REELECTION
    CORPORATE OFFICE
    ADEQUATE REMEDY
    
    JAN FIXDAL,
    
                               Plaintiff,
                                                 i
           V.                                           C.A. No. 18753-NC
                                                 i
    MARTIN S. ALBERT, JULIUS C.
    (PAT) DARDEN, and DOLPHIN                    ;
    INTERCONNECT SOLUTIONS,
    INC., a Delaware corporation,                ;
    
                               Defendants.       1
    
          -               -
    MARTIN S. ALBERT and
    JULIUS C. (PAT) DARDEN,
    
           Counterclaim and Third-Party          ;
           Plaintiffs,
                                                 ;
           V.
    
                                                 i
    JAN FIXDAL, JAN
    ENGEBRETSEN and YNGVAR                       i
    HVISTENDAHL,
                                                 i
           Counterclaim and Third-Party
           Defendants.
    
    
                     ANSWER. COUNTERCLAIM AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIM
    
                   Defendants Martin S. Albert and Julius C. (Pat) Darden (together, "Defendants"),
    
    for their Answer, re:spond  to the individually numbered paragraphs of the Amended Complaint,
    
    and assert affirmative defenses and counterclaims, as follows:
    
    
    
                    1.      Denied, except admit that Albert and Darden, at all relevant times, were
    
    two of the three members of the Board of Directors, of Dolphin Interconnect Solutions, Inc.
    
    ("Dolphin" or the "Company"), and that the third Board member, Kare Lochsen,  is an employee
    
    of Dolphin.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • MARTIN S. ALBERT, JULIUS C.
  • Defendants.
  • COUNTERCLAIM AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIM
  • and assert affirmative defenses and counterclaims,
  • two of the three members of the Board of Directors, of Dolphin Interconnect Solutions, Inc.
  • , and that the third Board member, Kare Lochsen, is an employee
  • except admit the allegations of the first sentence of this paragraph
  • and admit that Dolphin has 5,314,501 shares outstanding owned of record by approximately 350
  • stockholders, almost all of who reside outside the United States and the majority of whom
  • approved Severance Agreements, similar to those adopted by myriad other companies, the
  • This paragraph states legal conclusions as to which no responsive pleading
  • To the extent that this paragraph makes factual allegations,
  • Board, inter alia, that courts have upheld rights plan similar to the one being considered by
  • Denied and for further answer, Defendants respectfully refer to the Rights
  • Waid, Engebretsen, Hvistendahl and Lochsen making clear that the
  • Counts I-V of the Amended Complaint are derivative in nature.
  • Plaintiff has
  • SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
  • certain shareholders of Dolphin, including Selvaag, to restructure Dolphin's Board of
  • The Restructuring Agreement is a legally valid voting contract between
  • the vacancy created by Mr. Lochsen not standing for reelection) and would nominate Jan
  • In connection with the December 18, 2000 Board meeting, management
  • Counterclaimants have no adequate remedy at law.
  • Engebretsen's and Hvistendahl's claim to corporate office is barred by the

  • 4 . FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ALBERT
    SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS
    COMMON STOCK
    DIRECTORS
    POISON
    PLAINTIFF
    PILL
    RIGHTS PLAN
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    BYLAW AMENDMENTS
    SHARES
    SELF-DEALING
    DOLPHIN BOARD
    OWNER
    DEFENDANTS
    UNENFORCEABILITY
    SHAREHOLDERS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    TIMES RELEVANT HERETO
    ANNUAL MEETING
    REDRESS SELF-DEALING BREACHES
    MANAGEMENT
    SELF-DEALING SCHEME
    EXERCISE PRICE
    EXCHANGE ACT
    BENEFICIAL OWNER
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    FULLY SET
    INTERCONNECT SOLUTIONS
    
                                                                                  ORIGINAL
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                    
    
                                 IN AND F'OR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    JAN FIXDAL,
    
                               Plaintiff,      >
    
            V.                                 i
                                               >
    MARTIN S. ALBERT, JULIUS C.  )
    (PAT)  DARDEN, and DOLPHIN                 )
    INTERCONNECT SOLUTIONS,  )
    INC,, a Delaware corporation,
                                               i
                               Defendants.  )
    
                                    FIRST  .4MENDED  COMPLAINT
    
                       PlaintiffJanFixdal  c' Plaintiff'), by and through his undersigned counsel,
    
    this action to redress self-dealing breaches of fiduciary duty committed by certain directors
    
    of Dolphin Interconnect Solutions, Inc. ("Dolphin"), and to obtain an order declaring invalid
    
    and unenforceable  (1) a stockholders rights plan adopted in April of 2000 (the "Poison Pill"),
    
    (ii) severance agreements entered into with certain members of Dolphin's management (the
    
    "Severance Agreements"), and (iii) certain bylaw amendments adopted on or about
    
    August 25, 2000. Relatedly, plaintiff also brings this action pursuant to 8 Del. C. 9 225(a)
    
    to determine the directors of Dolphin. Plaintiff, the owner of 25,000 shares of Dolphin
    
    common stock, alleges, on the basil3 of personal knowledge as to his own actions and upon
    
    information and belief as to all other actions, as follows:
    
                                             INTRODUCTION
    
                       1.      This is an action for breaches of fiduciary duty and a declaration of
    
    invalidity and unenforceability arisir g out of a series of self-dealing actions taken in bad faith
    
    by the individual defendants, Martin S. Albert ("Albert") and Julius C. (Pat) Darden
    
    WP3 : 616559 .2
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • MARTIN S. ALBERT, JULIUS C.)
  • INTERCONNECT SOLUTIONS,)
  • PlaintiffJanFixdal c' Plaintiff'), by and through his undersigned counsel, brings
  • this action to redress self-dealing breaches of fiduciary duty committed by certain directors
  • and unenforceable a stockholders rights plan adopted in April of 2000,
  • and certain bylaw amendments adopted on or about
  • to determine the directors of Dolphin.
  • Plaintiff, the owner of 25,000 shares of Dolphin
  • common stock, alleges, on the basil3 of personal knowledge as to his own actions and upon
  • invalidity and unenforceability arisir g out of a series of self-dealing actions taken in bad
  • by the individual defendants, Martin S. Albert and Julius C. Darden
  • approved and implemented an obviously self-dealing scheme designed to entrench themselves
  • of Plaintiffs and the other public shareholders ofDolphin's stock.
  • May of 2000 by purporting to adopt the Poison Pill.
  • successful proxy contest or consent solicitation to take control ofthe Dolphin Board.
  • entrenchment on June 8,200O by awarding themselves the generous Severance Agreements,
  • Plaintiff Jan Fixdal is, and at all times relevant hereto has been, a record
  • (the "Exchange Act")
  • investment banker in setting the exercise price - an act the attorney stated is commonly done
  • a shareholder could mount a proxy battle, oust Dolphin's management, and then redeem the
  • "Beneficial Owner" of more than twenty percent of the outstanding shares of Dolphin
  • At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, held on December 18, 2000
  • paragraphs as if fully set forth here .n.
  • shareholders uncompromising fiduciary duties of loyalty,

  • 5 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ALBERT
    SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS
    COMMON STOCK
    PILL
    POISON
    RIGHTS PLAN
    SHARES
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    AMENDMENTS
    PLAINTIFF
    OWNER
    SELF-DEALING
    DIRECTORS
    DOLPHIN BOARD
    DELAWARE
    SHAREHOLDERS
    DELAWARE CORPORATION
    UNENFORCEABILITY
    TIMES RELEVANT HERETO
    BYLAW AMENDMENTS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    EXERCISE PRICE
    EXCHANGE ACT
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    SELF-DEALING SCHEME
    BENEFICIAL OWNER
    FULLY SET
    INVALIDITY
    OFA SERIES
    
         i
    \                       IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                          IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
              JAN FIXDAL,                              1
    
                                        Plaintiff,     i
    
                      V.
                                                       )
              MARTIN S. ALBERT, JULIUS C.  )
              (PAT) DARDEN, and DOLPHIN                )                                               
              INTERCONNECT SOLUTIONS,  )
              INC., a Delaware corporation,
                                                       1                                               
                                        Defendants. )                                                  
                                                                                                       
    
    
                                                       COMPLAINT
    
                                 Plaintiff Jan Fixdal Y`Plaintiff'),  by and through his undersigned
    
              brings this action to redress self-dealing breaches of fiduciary duty committed by certain
    
              directors of Dolphin Interconnect Solutions, Inc. ("Dolphin"), and to obtain an order
    
              declaring invalid1 and unenforceable, (i) a stockholders, rights plan adopted in April of
    
              (the "Poison Pill"), (ii) severance agreements entered into with certain  mlembers  
    
              management (the "Severance Agreements"), and (iii) certain  byla)ti amendments adopted on
    
              or about August 25,200O. Plaintiffs  the owner of 25,000 shares of Dolphin common stock,
    
              allcgcs, on the basis of personal knowledge as to his own actions and upon information and
    
              belief as to all other actions, as follows:
    
                                                      j~NTRODUCTI0  N-
    
                                 1.     This is an action for breaches of fiduciary duty iand a
    
              invalidity and unenforceability arising out  ofa series of self-dealing actions  tak.en
    
              by the individual defendants, Martin S. Albert ("Albert") and Julius C. (Pat) Darden
    
              ("Darden"), who were,  at the time cf the actions challenged herein, two thirds of the
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • MARTIN S. ALBERT, JULIUS C.)
  • INC., a Delaware corporation,
  • brings this action to redress self-dealing breaches of fiduciary duty committed by certain
  • declaring invalid1 and unenforceable, a stockholders, rights plan adopted in April of 2000
  • and certain byla)ti amendments adopted on
  • Plaintiffs the owner of 25,000 shares of Dolphin common stock,
  • invalidity and unenforceability arising out ofa series of self-dealing actions tak.en in bad
  • of directors of Dlolphin.
  • approved and implemented an obvio lsly self-dealing scheme designed to entrench themselves
  • by a total of 346 shareholders, eighl of whom reside in the United States.
  • May of 2000 by purporting to adopl the Poison Pill.
  • successfU1 proxy contest or consent solicitation to take control of.the Dolphin Board.
  • entrenchment on June 8,200O by awarding themselves the generous Severance Agreements,
  • Plaintiff Jan F'ixdal is, and at all times relevant hereto has been, a record
  • shares of Dolphin's common stock, out of a total of §,3 14,501 shares outstanding.
  • (the "Exchange Act")
  • investment banker in setting the exercise price - an act the attorney stated is commonly done
  • "Beneficial Owner" of more than twenty percent ofthe outstanding shares of Dolphin
  • paragraphs as if fully set forth herein
  • shareholders uncompromising fiduciary duties of loyalty,
  • Because the Bylaw Amendments were never duly and validly adopted
  •    |