LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS v SORRENTO NETWORKS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 19,038, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: OCT-09-2001 TUE 02 13 PM CHANCERY COURT CHAMBERS FAX NO. 3027396179, Plaintiff: TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00019038, Sorrento, Preferred Stock, Delaware, Investors, Del, Paragraph, Complaint, Jurisdiction, Shares, Smock, Sorrento Networks, Stock, Osicom, Protective Provisions, Certificate, Conspiracy, Allegations, Breach, Charter, Preferredshares, Holders, Personal Jurisdiction, Investment, Incorporation, First Sentence, Issuance, Subsection, Abetting, Preliminary Injunction, Corporate Charter, Andersen Weinroth, Aiding, Shareholders, Rights Agreement, Amended Complaint, Debt, Delaware Law, Rights, Support , ContentID: 120246277

Case Documents
1 2001-12-17 DEFENDANT R. JACOBSONS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127259
12 pages
PDF
2 2001-12-17 OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF SG COWEN SECURITIES AND R. SMOCKS MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127053
47 pages
PDF
3 2001-11-19 . SORRENTO NETWORKS ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126959
22 pages
PDF
4 2001-11-19 ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126958
25 pages
PDF
5 2001-10-09 LETTER OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126747
6 pages
PDF
6 2001-09-07 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114869
26 pages
PDF
7 2001-08-29 PLAINTIFFS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127054
45 pages
PDF
8 2001-08-28 PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127175
23 pages
PDF
9 2001-08-06 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR A TEMP. RESTRAINING ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127243
15 pages
PDF
10 2001-08-06 VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126960
24 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 10 documents , 245 pages
Price: $ 64.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . DEFENDANT R. JACOBSONS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
JURISDICTION
PLAINTIFFS
DELAWARE
AMENDED COMPLAINT
COURT
DEL
SORRENTO
PERSONAL JURISDICTION
ACT
BASIS
EXERCISE
ALLEGATION
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
MOTION
LONG-ARM
STOCK
STATUTE
DISMISS
ALLEGES
PURSUANT
DEFENDANT
PROPER
SUPPORT
INVESTMENT
PROCEEDING
PREFERRED STOCK
PROVISION
INSUFFICIENT
VIOLATION
           IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS, L.L.C.,
ANDERSEN WEINROTH & CO., L.P.,
SORRENTO HOLDINGS L.L.C., and
BELMARKEN HOLDING N.V.,                    t                              ,
                       Plaintiffs,         1t
             V.                                  C.A. No. 1903%NC

SORRENTO NETWORKS, INC.,                   ;
SORRENTO NETWORKS CORP.,
MERET  COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,               i
XIN CHENG, JAMES DIXON,
TINGYE LI, PHILIP ARNESON,                 ;
PARVINDER  CHADHA, ROHIT
PHANSALKAR, CHRISTOPHER SUE,
LEONARD HECHT, RICHARD
JACOBSON, RENN ZAPHIROPOULOS,
SG  COWEN  SECURITIES CORP. and
ROBERT SMOCK,

                       Defendants.



                     DEFENDANT RICHARD JACOBSON'S OPENING
                     BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO DISMISS
                   PURSUANT TO RULES 12(b)(2), 12 (b)(4) and 12 (b)(5)


                                         MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT  & TUNNELL
                                         A. Gilchrist Sparks, III
                                         Jon E. Abramczyk
                                         James G. McMillan,  III
                                         1201 N. Market Street
                                         P.O. Box 1347
                                         Wilmington, DE 19899
                                           Attorneys for Defendant
                                           Sorrento Networks, Inc.

December  17,200l



                                                                               i.

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • SORRENTO NETWORKS CORP.,
  • DEFENDANT RICHARD JACOBSON'S OPENING
  • BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO DISMISS
  • NATURE AND STAGE OF THE PROCEEDING
  • THIS COURT LACKS PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER MR.
  • Mr. Jacobson Has Not Performed Any Act That Would
  • Make Him Amenable to Long-Arm Jurisdiction.
  • The First Amended Complaint begins yet another stage in this litigation brought
  • by a group of disappointed investors seeking to recoup their investment in Sorrento Networks,
  • Plaintiffs' primary line of attack has not changed.
  • corporation that owns a majority of the common stock of Sorrento.
  • Delaware that would establish a basis for this Court to exercise jurisdiction over him
  • of holders of the Company's Series A Preferred Stock.
  • plaintiffs' proffered construction of a voting rights provision in Sorrento's charter and
  • Mr. Jacobson's opening brief in support of his motion to dismiss for lack of personal
  • Branson v. Exide Electronics Corn Del Supr., 625 A.2d 267, 268-69.
  • The First Amended Complaint alleges only
  • by withholding "the corporate records documenting the actions taken in violation of Sorrento's
  • plaintiffs cannot show strict compliance with the requirements of the Delaware longarm
  • There is no allegation that Mr. Jacobson "contractto supply services or
  • acts within this State are insufficient to establish a finding of jurisdiction based on the
  • 611 A.2d at 482 (the proper invocation of the conspiracy theory of jurisdiction requires

  • 2 . OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF SG COWEN SECURITIES AND R. SMOCKS MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DELAWARE
    SMOCK
    JURISDICTION
    DEFENDANT
    CONSPIRACY
    SORRENTO
    COURT
    BREACH
    DEL
    SUBSECTION
    ABETTING
    PERSONAL JURISDICTION
    AIDING
    INVESTORS
    SUPPORT
    ALLEGATIONS
    ROBERT SMOCK
    COMMUNICATIONS
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    SORRENTO NETWORKS
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    DISMISSING
    INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE
    FINANCING AGREEMENT
    KNOWING PARTICIPATION
    PREFERRED STOCK
    COWEN SECURITIES
    TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS
    ARM STATUTE
    
         IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                       IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS, L.L.C.,
    ANDERSEN WEINROTH & CO., L.P.,
    SORRENTO HOLDINGS L.L.C., and
    BELMARKEN HOLDING N.V.,
    
                      Plaintiffs,
                                                  : Civil Action No. 19038NC
           V.
    
    SORRENTO NETWORKS, INC., SORRENTO
    NETWORKS CORP., MERET  COMMUNICA-
    TIONS, INC., XIN CHENG, JAMES DIXON,
    TINGYE  LI, PHILIP ARNESON, PARVINDER
    CHADHA, ROHIT PHANSALKAR,
    CHRISTOPHER SUE, LEONARD HECHT,
    RICHARD JACOBSON, RENN ZAPHIROPOULOS, I
    SG  COWEN  SECURITIES CORP. and
    ROBERT SMOCK,
    
                      Defendants.
    
                         OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
                           SG COWEN SECURITIES CORP.
                  AND ROBERT SMOCK'S MOTION TO DISMISS
    
    
                                       SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE,
                                            MEAGHER  & FLOM LLP
                                       One Rodney Square
                                       P.O. Box 636
                                       Wilmington, Delaware 19899-0636
                                       (302) 651-3000
                                       Attorneys for Defendants SG  Cowen
                                       Securities Corp. and Robert Smock
    
    
    
    DATED: December  17,200l
    
    
    
                                               TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
                                                                                                       
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS, L.L.C., ANDERSEN WEINROTH & CO., L.P.,
  • SORRENTO NETWORKS, INC., SORRENTO NETWORKS CORP., MERET COMMUNICA-TIONS, INC., XIN CHENG,
  • ROBERT SMOCK,
  • OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
  • SG COWEN SECURITIES CORP.
  • THE COURT DOES NOT HAVE PERSONAL JURISDICTION
  • Purview Of The Delaware Long Arm Statute
  • Subsection 3 104
  • PLAINTIFFS HAVE FAILED TO STATE A CLAIM AS A MATTER OF LAW AGAINST SG COWEN OR ROBERT
  • Conspiracy Or Aiding And Abetting A Breach Of
  • Fiduciary Duty
  • The Amended Complaint Fails To State A Claim For Tortious Interference With Contract.
  • Bipelow/Diversified Secondarv Partnershiu Fund 1990 v. Damson/Birtcher Partners, Del., Ch.,
  • Iotex Communications.

  • 3 . . SORRENTO NETWORKS ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PARAGRAPH
    DEFENDANTS
    PLAINTIFFS
    COURT
    FIRST SENTENCE
    ALLEGATIONS
    INVESTORS
    ANSWERING DEFENDANTS
    DEFENDANTS INCORPORATE
    SECOND SENTENCE
    RESPONSES
    RIGHTS AGREEMENT
    SECURITIES
    ANSWERING DEFENDANTS LACK
    INFORMATION SUFFICIENT
    TRUTH
    RESPONSIVE PLEADING
    XIN CHENG
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    TERMS THEREOF
    PREFERRED STOCK
    SORRENTO NETWORKS
    JAMES DIXON
    ROHIT PHANSALKAR
    CERTIFICATE
    COMMUNICATIONS
    PHILLIP ARNESON
    REDEMPTION
    ACCURATE PARTIAL QUOTATION
    
                                                                                            ORIGINAL
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
     TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS, L.L.C.,
     ANDERSEN, WEINROTH  & CO., L.P.,
     SORRENTO HOLDINGS, L.L.C., and
     BELMARKEN HOLDING N.V.,
    
                                Plaintiffs,
                                                                                                       
               v.
    
     SORRENTO NETWORKS, INC.,
     SORRENTO NETWORKS CORP.,                                        Civil Action No. 19038-NC
     MERET COMMUNICATIONS, INC., XIN
     CHENG, JAMES DIXON, TINGYE LI,
     PHILLIP ARNESON, PARVINDER
     CHADHA, ROHIT PHANSALKAR,
     CHRISTOPHER SUE, LEONARD
     HECHT, RICHARD JACOBSON, RENN
     ZAPHIROPOULOS, SG  COWEN
     SECURITIES CORP., and ROBERT
     SMOCK,
    
                                Defendants.
    
                              ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    
             Defendants Xin Cheng, James Dixon and Tingye Li (collectively, the "Answering
    
    Defendants"), by and through Richards, Layton &Finger, P.A., their undersigned attorneys, respond
    
    to plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (the "Complaint"), as follows:
    
             1.        Denied, except it is admitted that plaintiffs characterize their complaint as
    
    in paragraph 1.
    
             2.        Denied, except it is admitted that plaintiffs seek appointment of a receiver.
    
             3.        Answering Defendants lack information sufficient to form a belief as to the
    
    
    RLFI-2381419.4
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • SORRENTO NETWORKS, INC.,
  • SECURITIES CORP., and ROBERT
  • ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
  • Defendants Xin Cheng, James Dixon and Tingye Li (collectively, the "Answering
  • to plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint,
  • falsity of the allegations of the first sentence of paragraph 3.
  • The allegations of the second sentence
  • Answering Defendants lack information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or
  • Co., L.P. purchased 275,230 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of Sorrento for approximately
  • except it is admitted that Meret Optical Communications is a California
  • corporation andis the holder of amajority ofthe voting stock of Sorrento Networks,
  • except it is admitted that Rohit Phansalkar served on the Sorrento Corp.
  • Paragraph 22 states a legal conclusion as to which no responsive pleading is required.
  • Form S-l to certain prospective private investors in Sorrento, and the Court is respectfully
  • Investors' Rights Agreement, a Co-Sale Agreement and a Stock Purchase Agreement.
  • Purchase Agreement for the complete terms thereof.
  • except it is admitted that the Investors' Rights Agreement and the Certificate
  • except it is admitted that paragraph 33 contains an accurate partial quotation
  • referred to the redemption letter for the complete terms thereof.
  • of Sorrento Corp. from October 2000 through October 2001; and that Phillip Arneson has served
  • Defendants incorporate as if set forth in full the responses in paragraphs 1 through

  • 4 . ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANT
    COMPLAINT
    SORRENTO NETWORKS
    PLAINTIFFS
    INVESTORS
    PARAGRAPH
    ALLEGATIONS
    DEFENDANT DENIES
    ADMITS
    INVESTMENT
    INCORPORATES
    COURT
    RESPONSES
    RESPECTFULLY REFERS
    PURCHASE
    PREFERRED STOCK
    RIGHTS AGREEMENT
    SORRENTO HOLDINGS
    XIN CHENG
    CERTIFICATE
    RESPONSIVE PLEADING
    TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS
    JAMES DIXON
    IPO
    DEFENDANT REPEATS
    FULLY SET
    FIRST SENTENCE
    AMENDED COMPLAINT STATES
    DIRECTORS
    
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                    ,,
    
                                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS, L.L.C.,
    ANDERSEN WEINROTH  & CO., L.P.,              i
    SORRENTO HOLDINGS L.L.C., and
    BELMARKEN HOLDING N.V.,                      i
    
                          Plaintiffs,            i
    
                    v.                           ;    C.A. No. 19038-NC
    
    SORRENTO NETWORKS, INC.,                     i
    SORRENTO NETWORKS CORP.,
    MERET COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,                  i
    XIN CHENG, JAMES DIXON,
    TINGYE LI, PHILIP ARNESON,                   ;
    PARVINDER  CHADHA, ROHIT
    PHANSALKAR, CHRISTOPHER SUE,                 i
    LEONARD HECHT, RICHARD                       )
    JACOBSON, RENN ZAPHIROPOULOS,
    SG COWEN SECURITIES CORP. and                ;
    ROBERT SMOCK,
                                                 ;
                          Defendants.            1
    
                          ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    
                    Defendant Sorrento Networks, Inc. ("Sorrento" or "Defendant"), by its
    
    undersigned attorneys, hereby responds to plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (the "Amended
    
    Complaint"):
    
                    This case was brought by a group of venture capitalists who were allowed to
    
    purchase a pre-IPO equity interest in Sorrento in exchange for promised assistance in helping
    
    Sorrento gamer new customers and business. The investors no doubt expected to obtain the
    
    dramatic short-term profits that many investors had captured with investments in similar high
    
    technology IPO's in the late winter and early spring of 2000. When circumstances changed in
    
    
    
    the late summer of 2000, however, Sorrento could not complete an IPO. The disappointed
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • SORRENTO NETWORKS CORP.,
  • XIN CHENG, JAMES DIXON,
  • ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
  • Defendant Sorrento Networks, Inc., by its
  • The investors no doubt expected to obtain the
  • the late summer of 2000, however, Sorrento could not complete an IPO.
  • Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint continues their onslaught against Sorrento,
  • Series A Preferred Stock without first obtaining plaintiffs' consent - is currently on appeal
  • before the Supreme Court of Delaware, despite plaintiffs' efforts to frustrate the Supreme
  • Defendant is without knowledge or information sufticient to form a belief
  • as to the truth of the averments in paragraph 3 of the Amended Complaint, except admits that
  • Telcom-SNI Investors, L.L.C. purchased 2,697,248 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of
  • plaintiff Sorrento Holdings L.L.C. purchased 1,192,661 shares of Sorrento's Series A Preferred
  • Defendant denies the allegations of paragraph 8 of the Amended
  • directors from January to September 2000 and as Sorrento Networks Corp.`s Chief Executive
  • The allegations of the first sentence of paragraph 16 are admitted.
  • except admits that SG Cowen has provided investment banking services to Sorrento
  • Sorrento and a group of investors entered into an Investors' Rights Agreement, a Stock
  • Defendant respectfully refers the
  • and respectfully refers the Court to Sorrento's Certificate of Incorporation for the complete
  • that Xin Cheng was Chairman of Sorrento and President and a director of Sorrento Networks
  • contain conclusions of law to which no responsive pleading is required.
  • Defendant repeats and incorporates its responses to paragraphs 1 through
  • 67 as if fully set forth herein.
  • Paragraph 127 of the Amended Complaint states conclusions of law as to

  • 5 . LETTER OPINION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    INTERLOCUTORY
    CONSIDERATIONS
    SORRENTO NETWORKS
    DEFENDANTS
    CERTIFICATE
    PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    SUPREME COURT
    REVIEW
    SUPREME COURT RULE
    INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS
    PREFERRED STOCK
    PLAINTIFFS
    SUCCESS
    PROTECTION
    CORPORATE CHARTERS
    JUSTICE
    SERVE CONSIDERATIONS
    LITIGATION
    PURPOSES
    RESOLUTION
    MATTER
    REASONS
    PROBABILITY
    INCORPORATION
    LAW
    CONSTRUCTION
    ISSUANCE
    RCVICW
    FACTS
    
    OCT-09-2001 TUE 02:13 PM CHANCERY COURT CHAMBERS            FAX NO. 3027396179                     
                                                                                                    
                                        COURT OF CHANCERY
                                                  OF `THE
                                             STATE OF DELAWARE
    
    
                                                                                             417 s.sbw
                                                                                       Dcwcn.  DCLWMX 
                                                                                      TFIEWONC 
                                             October 9, 2001                          FACSIM  .E (302)
    
    
    
                                                                     VIA FACSIMILE AND
                                                                      FIRST  CLASS MAIL
    
    
    
           Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Esquire            Jon E. Abramczyk, Esquire                         
           CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE                       MOKRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT  i. i
                  $ XIUTZ, LLP                               &TUNNELL                  :               
           1220 Market Street                        1201 North Market Street                1.        
           P.O. Box 2207                             P.O. Box 1347                                     
           Wilminglon,  DE  19899-2207               Wilmington, DE 19899-1347  I'  !.
                                                                                             (,`,.  ..>
                                                                                             :;        
                                                                                             .I        
                  Re: Telcom-SNI Investors,  L.L.C.,  et al. v,                                     -. 
                        Sorrento Networks, Inc., et al.
                            C.A. No. 19038-NC
                        Submitted: October 1, 2001
    
           Dear Counsel:
    
                  Defendants, Sorrento Networks, Inc. ("Sorrento"), Xin Chcng and
    
           Jim Dixon, have moved, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42, for
    
           certification of an interlocutory appeal to the Supreme Court of that portion
    
           of this Court's Order of September 7, 2001 (the "Order"), which
    
           prcIiminarily  enjoined Defendants  Cram issuing additional shares of
    
           Sorrenlo Class A Prcfcrred Stock without the prior approval of the holders
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Sorrento Networks, Inc., et al.
  • Defendants, Sorrento Networks, Inc., Xin Chcng and
  • certification of an interlocutory appeal to the Supreme Court of that portion
  • For the reasons that follow,
  • probability of success on the merits of their claim that Sorrento's certificate
  • Preferred Stock without their consent.
  • the cerlificate ot' incorporation, In essence, two questions were evaluated:
  • protection of the Class A Preferred shareholders against dilution,
  • Plaintiffs did not negotiate an effective veto over Sorrento's ability to raise
  • additional i`unding through the issuance of additional.
  • interlocutory appeals of preliminary injunctions do occur,
  • construction of corporate charters.
  • there are no other facts
  • review of the Order would serve consideralions of justiceB2
  • preliminary injunction purposes, by the Court:
  • Supreme Court Rule 42.
  • Del`cndants have not asserted that interlocutory review may terminate the litigation; thcp
  • and because they are not premised upon an application of the law to facts
  • Whether an interlocutory rcvicw will materially aid resolution of this
  • matter is a subject of fair debate.

  • 6 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SORRENTO
    PLAINTIFFS
    HOLDERS
    PROTECTIVE PROVISIONS
    COURT
    INVESTORS
    SHARES
    CERTIFICATE
    RIGHTS
    HOLDINGS
    SORRENTO NETWORKS
    ESQUIRE
    DELAWARE
    EQUITY SECURITY
    ISSUANCE
    DEFENDANTS
    OUTSTANDING SHARES
    RIGHTS AGREEMENT
    INTERPRETATION
    INVESTMENT
    INCORPORATION
    IRREPARABLE HARM
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    SORRENTO-CALIFORNIA
    REASONABLE PROBABILITY
    AFFIDAVIT
    TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
    CONSTRUCTION
    
        IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                         IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS, L.L.C., :
    ANDERSEN, WEINROTH & CO., L-P., :
    SORRENTO HOLDINGS, L.L.C., and :
    BELMARKEN HOLDING N.V., :
    
                                 Plaintiffs,
    
                        V.                        .. C.A. No.  19038-NC
    
    SORRENTO NETWORKS, INC.,
    XIN CHENG, JIM DIXON, and
    JOHN DOES 1-5,
    
                                 Defendants. :
    
    
                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION
    
                                  Submitted: August 29, 2001
                                 Decided: September 7, 2001
    
    
    Henry E. Gallagher, Jr., Esquire, Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Esquire and Samuel D.
    Brickley,  II, Esquire of Connolly Bove Lodge  & Hutz, LLP, Wilmington,
    Delaware and Mark C. Hansen, Esquire and David L. Schwarz,  Esquire of
    Kellogg, Huber , Hansen, Todd  & Evans, P.L.L.C., Washington,  D-C.,
    Attorneys for Plaintiffs.
    
    A. Gilchrist Sparks, III, Esquire, Jon E. Abramczyk, Esquire and James G.
    McMillan,  III, Esquire of Morris, Nichols, Arsht &  Tunnell,  Wilmington,
    Delaware, Attorneys for Defendants.
    
    NOBLE, Vice Chancellor
    
    
    
            Plaintiffs, all holders of Series A Preferred Stock of Defendant Sorrento
    
    Networks, Inc. ("Sorrento"), have invoked "protective provisions" in Sorrento's
    
    Certificate of Incorporation in an effort to obtain a preliminary injunction
    
    precluding Sorrento from incurring additional indebtedness and from issuing
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS, L.L.C.,: ANDERSEN, WEINROTH & CO., L-P.,:
  • SORRENTO HOLDINGS, L.L.C., and:
  • Henry E. Gallagher, Jr., Esquire, Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Esquire and Samuel D. Brickley, II,
  • Gilchrist Sparks, III, Esquire, Jon E. Abramczyk, Esquire and James G. McMillan, III, Esquire
  • all holders of Series A Preferred Stock of Defendant Sorrento
  • Networks, Inc., have invoked "protective provisions" in Sorrento's
  • Certificate of Incorporation in an effort to obtain a preliminary injunction
  • Sorrento's plans for issuing additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock must be
  • Co., L.P., Sorrento Holdings, L.L.C., and Belmarken
  • "Blank check" stock is "colloquialism used to describe stock whose powers, designations,
  • As the result of recent issuance by
  • Sorrento Networks Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiary,
  • Sorrento Networks Corp. was at one time known as Osicom Technologies, Inc. and, for
  • These contentions are not germaue to the issues now before the Court and, thus, are not
  • Sorrento-California, as a startup corporation with no immediate prospects of profitability,
  • investment decision has resulted, perhaps inevitably, in this litigation.
  • ' Sorrento's Corrected Certificate of Incorporation, which appears as Exhibit 4 to the
  • the then outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock:
  • pendency of the temporary restraining order application,
  • a threat of imminent, irreparable harm if injunctive relief is not
  • have a reasonable probability of success on the merits of their claim that Sorrento
  • I5 The amount of Debt also exceeds the limitation on Debt prescribed by the Investors' Rights
  • issue, any other equity security, including any
  • Sorrento vigorously contests any interpretation of the phrase "any other
  • construction precept that the certificate be construed "as a whole" with meaning

  • 7 . PLAINTIFFS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    OSICOM
    COURT
    DELAWARE
    SHARES
    INVESTORS
    DEL
    STOCK
    CHARTER
    PROTECTIVE PROVISIONS
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    SHAREHOLDERS
    ANDERSEN DEP
    HOLDING
    CERTIFICATE
    INCORPORATION
    CORPORATE CHARTER
    OUTSTANDING
    RESOLUTION
    BELMARKEN HOLDING
    DEFENDANTS
    EQUITY SECURITY
    PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    IPO
    ANDERSEN WEINROTH
    PREFERENCES
    INVESTMENT
    TRANSACTIONS
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
                                                                                     p/cd-
    TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS, L.L.C.,
    ANDERSEN, WEINROTH  & CO., L.P.,        i                                        &!I2  y/i@/
    SORRENTO HOLDINGS, L.L.C., and          )                                            7 a..  X&  &d'  /~,r&da  /
    
    
                           PLAINTIFFS' OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
                      THEIR MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
                              AND FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    
    
    
    
    
    OF COUNSEL:                                  Henry E. Gallagher, Jr. (#495)
    Mark C. Hansen                               Collins J. Seitz, Jr. (#2237)
    David L. Schwarz                             Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP
    Kellogg, Huber, Hansen,                      1220 Market Street
    Todd & Evans, P.L.L.C.                       P.O. Box 2207
    1615 M Street, N.W.                          Wilmington, DE 19899
    Suite 400                                    (302) 6589141
    Washington, D.C. 20036
    (202) 326-7900                               Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Telcom-SNI
                                                 Investors, L. L. C., Andersen, Weinroth  &
                                                 Co., L. P., Sorrento Holdings, L. L. C., and
    Dated: August 22,200l                        Belmarken Holding IV. V.
    
    
    
                                                    TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
                                                                                                       
    
    
    TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS, L.L.C.,
  • BELMARKEN HOLDING N.V.,
  • PLAINTIFFS' OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
  • THEIR MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  • AND FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
  • Sorrento Commits to Shed the Osicom Albatross
  • Interested Transactions, and Mismanagement
  • Osicom Scuttles the Second IPO Attempt.
  • Plaintiffs Request Redemption, Sorrento Refuses.
  • Of Incorporation
  • Purported Stock Issuance Based Thereon
  • Preferred Shares Issuance Violates Its Charter and Delaware Law
  • The Share Authorization and Issuance Violates Sorrento's Charter
  • Of the Series A Shareholders
  • Plaintiffs Interest and Negate the Protective Provisions
  • Affiliate Transaction Covenants in Its Corporate Charter
  • Inc. v. Atlas Corp., Del.
  • Citadel Holding Corn.

  • 8 . PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEL
    PLAINTIFFS
    STOCK
    COURT
    PREFERREDSHARES
    CHARTER
    DEFENDANTS
    DEBT
    ISSUANCE
    DELAWARE LAW
    SHARES
    CORPORATE CHARTER
    AUTHORIZE
    PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    RIGHTS
    CERTIFICATE
    SHAREHOLDERS
    DEBT COVENANT
    BLASIUS INDUS
    PROVISIONS
    VIOLATIONS
    INCORPORATION
    AMENDMENT
    ARMSTRONG DEP
    EQUITY SECURITY
    INVESTORS
    RIGHTS AGREEMENT
    HARDSHIPS
    IRREPARABLE HARM
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS, L.L.C.,          >                                            Ff  /Gd
    ANDERSEN, WEINROTH  & CO., L.P.,       )                                       c!zh/-/
    SORRENTO HOLDINGS, L.L.C., and         )
    BELMARKEN HOLDING N.V.,                                                             6  .! /q?
                                           ;
                           Plaintiffs,
                                           ;     Civil Action No. 19038NC
           V.
                                           ;     CONFIDENTIAL I FILED UNDER SEAL
    SORRENTO NETWORKS, INC.,
    XIN CHENG, JIM DIXON, and              i
    JOHN DOES l-5,                         >
    
                           Defendants.
    
    
                        PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR
                           MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    
    
    
    
    
    OF COUNSEL:                                 Henry E. Gallagher, Jr. (#495)
                                                Collins J. Seitz, Jr. (#2237)
    Mark C. Hansen                              Samuel D. Brickley, II (#3276)
    David L. Schwarz                            Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP
    Kellogg, Huber, Hansen,                     1220 Market Street
    Todd & Evans, P.L.L.C.                      P.O. Box 2207
    1615 M Street, N.W.                         Wilmington, DE 19899
    Suite 400                                   (302) 658-9141
    Washington, D.C. 20036
    (202) 326-7900                              Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Telcom-SNI
                                                Investors, L.L.C., Andersen, Weinroth &
                                                Co., L.P., Sorrento Holdings, L.L.C., and
    Dated: August 28, 2001                      Belmarken Holding N. V.
    
    
    
                                                     TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
    
    
    INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • SORRENTO NETWORKS, INC.,
  • Defendants.
  • PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR
  • MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
  • Debt Covenant
  • And Delaware Law
  • Violates Sorrento's Corporate Charter
  • PreferredShares
  • as is Any Stock Issuance Purportedly Authorized Thereby.
  • The Balance of Hardships Tips Entirely in Plaintiffs' Favor.
  • AOC Ltd. Partnershin v. Horsham Core., Del.
  • Blasius Indus..

  • 9 . MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR A TEMP. RESTRAINING ORDER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SORRENTO
    DEFENDANTS
    INVESTORS
    REQUEST
    PREFERRED STOCK
    COURT
    DELAWARE
    INVESTMENT
    PROTECTIVE PROVISIONS
    TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
    SHARES
    WEINROTH
    SORRENTO NETWORKS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    DEL
    CERTIFICATE
    INSPECTION
    REQUEST REDEMPTION
    OUTSTANDING
    INCORPORATION
    RIGHTS AGREEMENT
    HANSEN DAVID
    SORRENTO REFUSES
    AMENDMENT
    TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS
    JIM DIXON
    INTER-COMPANY DEBT
    DELAWARE LAW
    CORPORATE CHARTER
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                   IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS, L.L.C.,
    ANDERSEN, WEINROTH  & CO., L.P.,
    SORRENTO HOLDINGS, L.L.C., and            )
    BELMARKEN HOLDING N.V.,                   >
    
                             Plaintiffs,
                                              >    Civil Action No. /903  F----/J-
           V.
    
    SORRENTO NETWORKS, INC.,
    XIN CHENG, JIM DIXON, and
    JOHN DOES 1-5,
    
                             Defendants.      ;
    
                           MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS'
                      MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
    
    
    
                                                   Henry  E. Gallagher, Jr. (495)
                                                   Collins J. Seitz, Jr. (2237)
                                                   Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP
                                                   1220 Market Street
                                                   P.O. Box 2207
                                                   Wilmington, DE 19899
                                                   (302) 658-9141
                                                   Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    
    Dated: August 6,200 1
    
    OF COUNSEL:
    Mark C. Hansen
    David L. Schwarz
    Kellogg, Huber, Hansen,
    Todd & Evans, P.L.L.C.
    1615 M Street, N.W.
    Suite 400
    Washington, D.C. 20036
    (202) 326-7900
    
    
    
                                                      TABLIE  OF CONTENTS
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS, L.L.C., ANDERSEN, WEINROTH & CO., L.P.,
  • SORRENTO NETWORKS, INC.,
  • XIN CHENG, JIM DIXON, and
  • MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS'
  • MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
  • Mark C. Hansen David L. Schwarz Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd & Evans, P.L.L.C.
  • Plaintiffs' Investment in Sorrento, and the Protective Provisions
  • Plaintiffs Request Redemption, Sorrento Refuses
  • Plaintiffs Request Inspection, Sorrento, Refuses.
  • Certificate of Incorporation
  • Del.
  • consent of holders of more than 50% of Sorrento's Series A Preferred shares.
  • collectively own more than 50% of the outstanding Series A Preferred Stock,
  • On August 2,2001, defendants announced a $32 million private financing for Sorrento's
  • of additional Series A Preferred shares to Osicom (to repay alleged inter-company debt that
  • Sorrento has not sought approval of its Series A shareholders with respect to such
  • Investors' Rights Agreement, and
  • Telcom, the Andersen Weinroth Investors, and Belmarken have filed a Verified Complaint for , and to invalidate action taken in violation of Sorrento's Certificate of Incorporation, including
  • ' A separate action to enforce plaintiffs' contractual and statutory inspection rights is
  • Defendants have violated the Sorrelnto corporate charter and the Investors' Rights
  • the amendment is nlull and void as Sorrento failed to follow the steps that Delaware law

  • 10 . VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    PREFERRED STOCK
    INVESTORS
    ANDERSEN WEINROTH
    SHARES
    OSICOM
    DEFENDANTS
    DELAWARE
    INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
    SORRENTO HOLDINGS
    PREFERRED SHAREHOLDERS
    DECLARATORY
    CERTIFICATE
    INCORPORATION
    MAJORITY
    SORRENTO NETWORKS
    TRANSACTION
    OUTSTANDING
    VIOLATIONS
    PROCEEDING
    INVESTMENT
    PUBLIC OFFERING
    CORPORATE CHARTER
    PROTECTIVE PROVISIONS
    PRIOR CONSENT
    TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS
    VERIFIED COMPLAINT
    EQUITY SECURITIES
    INDIVIDUALLV
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                            
    
    
    TELCOM-SNI INVESTORS, L.L.C.,
    ANDERSEN, WEINROTH  & CO., L.P.,
    SORRENTO HOLDINGS, L.L.C., and
    BELMARKEN HOLDING N.V.,                      ;       Civil Action No. /?(I 3.W~~_
                          Plaintiffs,            ;                               ,I          .  _
                                                 )
           V.                                                                                 <  3
    
                                                 ;
    SORRENTO NETWORKS, INC.,
    XIN CHENG, JIM DIXON, and
    JOHN DOES l-5,
    
                           Defendants.
    
         VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
    
           Plaintiffs Telcom-SNI Investors, LLC ("Telcom"), Andersen, Weinroth & Co., L.P.
    
    ("Andersen Weinroth"), Sorrento Holdings, L.L.C. ("Sorrento Holdings" and, together with
    
    Andersen Weinroth, the "Andersen Weinroth Investors," and Belmarken Holding N.V., by and
    
    through counsel, upon knowledge to themselves and upon information and belief as to all other
    
    matters, allege for their Verified Complaint as follows:
    
                                          &r&we  of the Action
    
            1. This is a proceeding for declaratory and injunctive relief brought pursuant to 8 Del. C.
    
    $ 111, 10 Del. C. $6501 et seq., and Rule 57 of the Court of Chancery Rules, to preserve the
    
    status quo in a corporate dispute between !Sorrento Networks, Inc. ("Sorrento") and the plaintiffs,
    
    each of whom is a Series A Preferred Shareholder of Sorrento. Through conversations with
    
    various former officers and directors of Sorrento and a review of public documents, it has
    
    become apparent that the officers and directors of Sorrento, as well as other persons exercising
    
    
    
    control over Sorrento, have improperly wasted the company's assets, committed fraud, or
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • SORRENTO NETWORKS, INC.,
  • VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
  • Plaintiffs Telcom-SNI Investors, LLC, Andersen, Weinroth & Co., L.P.
  • , Sorrento Holdings, L.L.C. ("Sorrento Holdings" and, together with
  • Andersen Weinroth, the "Andersen Weinroth Investors," and Belmarken Holding N.V., by and
  • This is a proceeding for declaratory and injunctive relief brought pursuant to 8 Del.
  • status quo in a corporate dispute between!Sorrento Networks, Inc. and the plaintiffs,
  • routinely violated the terms of its corporate charter by engaging in affiliate transactions
  • were included in the company's Corrected Certificate of Incorporation ("Certificate of
  • Incorporation") to protect the interests of the minority shareholders.
  • dissipate their investment, and eliminate all of the rights and privileges accorded by the
  • redeem their Series A Preferred Shares and the right to visit the company to inspect its
  • In light of Sorrento's continuing violations of its Certificate of Incorporation and the
  • Sorrento's Certificate of Incorporation includes Protective Provisions specifically designed
  • more than $5,000,000 in debt without the Iprior consent of a majority of the Series A
  • aggregate without the prior consent of a majority of the Series A Preferred Shares,
  • of the Series A Preferred Shares, a declaration that all prior issuances of equity securities
  • of 2,697,248 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of Sorrento, for which Telcom paid
  • Defendants John Doe 1 through 4 represent the remaining members of Sorrento's
  • Osicom operates as a holding company for various
  • and currently owns 100% of the outstanding shares of Meret.
  • bankers deemed necessary to a successful initial public offering.
  • transaction entered into in connection with an equity financing of the
  • pavments from or navments to the Corporation individuallv in excess of
  •    |