LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

VERSYSS INC v COOPERS & LYBRAND Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: VIVCL85548, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: WALTHAM DISTRICT COURT, Plaintiff: VERSYSS INC, State: MA Massachusetts, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>VIVCL85548, Nds, Contel Corporation, Coopers, Lybrand, Versyss, Contel, Merger, Stock, Financial Statements, Nds Merger Corporation, Contel Systems, Common Stock, Merger Agreement, Contel Subsidiarytl, Parties, Ndsm, Securities, Registration Statement, Massachusetts, Complaint, Hoffman Aff, Shares, Amended Complaint, Alleges, Reports, Nds Companies, Sole, Connection, Facts, Audit Reports, Representations, Public Offering, Pursuant, Accounting, Prospectus, Certified Public Accountants , ContentID: 120246273

Case Documents
1 1991-10-29 DF MTN FR SUM JDG ON PLF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114852
4 pages
PDF
2 1991-10-29 DEF MEM N SUP MTN SUM JDG
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114850
11 pages
PDF
3 1991-10-29 AFFDVT STEVEN W PHILLIPS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114848
3 pages
PDF
4 1989-12-04 DEF MTN FR SUMMARY JDGMNT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114851
6 pages
PDF
5 1989-12-04 AFFDVT PETER J MARSHALL
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114847
3 pages
PDF
6 1989-07-31 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114849
17 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 6 documents , 44 pages
Price: $ 44.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . DF MTN FR SUM JDG ON PLF

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CONTEL
MERGER
STOCK
CONTEL SUBSIDIARYTL
MERGER AGREEMENT
SECURITIES
FACTS
PURSUANT
AMENDED COMPLAINT
PLAINTIFF
PHILLIPS
PROSPECTUS
OUTSTANDING
REQUESTS
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DISMISSING
MOTION
FILED HEREWITH
CONNECTION
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
SHARES
EXHIBIT
AFFIDAVIT
DEFENDANTS
SECURITIES ACT
ALLEGES
ASSETS
LIABILITIES
ACCORDANCE
                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                               DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

. . . . l . . l . .           ; . .     1 . .


                                                 .
VERSYSS INCORPORATED,                            .
                                                 l
         Plaintiff,                              .

                                                 l
V.                                               ..
COOPERS  & LYBRAND, A                            .
Partnership, and WILLIAM                         .
K. O'BRIEN, As Managing                          l
Partner of Coopers  & Lybrand, .

        .,Defendants.

l .     ...*     . . . . l . . . . .





                                DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR
                         SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM
               UNDER SECTION 11 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

         Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, defendants
Coopers  & Lybrand and William K. O'Brien (collectively  "C&L")

move for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's claim under

section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, Count I of the Third

Amended Complaint.

         The grounds for this Motion, as set forth more fully in a
Memorandum of law filed herewith, are the following:

         Plaintiff and its predecessors never acquired any NDS stock.
Because recovery under section 11 is only available to purchasers

of securities, plaintiff has no claim.

         Section  11 creates a right of action against certain persons

SNIPPETS:
  • SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM
  • Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, defendants Coopers & Lybrand and William K.
  • section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933,
  • The grounds for this Motion, as set forth more fully in a Memorandum of law filed herewith,
  • Plaintiff and its predecessors never acquired any NDS stock.
  • ./I.,- * the registration statement in question.Plaintiff alleges that it is the assignee of
  • Contel Corporation and NDS Merger Corporation ("Contel
  • Subsidiary"), and that those companies acquired in a merger shares which had been previously
  • Third Amended Complaint, 7717-22.
  • relevant merger transaction (the "Merger Agreement") --demonstrate that neither Contel nor
  • a merger was effected -- NDS was merged into Contel Subsidiary -- and as a consequence Contel
  • The only facts material to this Motion are certain facts relating to the Merger which show
  • subsidiary actually acquired the stock of NDS in connection therewith.
  • These documents are made exhibits to the Affidavit of Steven W. Phillips,
  • Corp. ("Contel Subsidiarytl), NDS and the principals of NDS
  • prospectus issued jointly by Contel and NDS,
  • (The Prospectus, in relevant part, is Exhibit 2 to the Phillips.
  • In accordance with the Merger Agreement,
  • the separate corporate existence of NDS terminated and each share of NDS stock issued and
  • WHEREFORE, C&L requests that summary judgment be entered dismissing VERSYSS' claim under

  • 2 . DEF MEM N SUP MTN SUM JDG

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    NDS
    MERGER
    STOCK
    CONTEL SUBSIDIARYTL
    SECURITIES
    ALLEGES
    VERSYSS
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    PLAINTIFF
    SHARES
    MERGER AGREEMENT
    LAW
    REGISTRATION STATEMENT
    THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
    FACTS
    CSC
    ASSETS
    COURT
    MOTION
    ISSUED PURSUANT
    COMMON STOCK
    PURCHASE
    LIABILITIES
    ASSIGNEE
    SUCCESSOR
    STANDING
    RIGHTS
    MISLEADING
    ACQUISITION
    
                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                               DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
    
    . *  . . l      ..*  . . . ...* .
    
    
                                           .
    VERSYSS INCORPORATED,                  ..
           Plaintiff,                      .
                                           .
    V .                                    .
                                           .
    COOPERS & LYBRAND, A                   .
    Partnership, and WILLIAM               .
    K. O'BRIEN, As Managing                 .
    Partner of Coopers  & Lybrand, ..
           D e f e n d a n t s .           ..
    . . l . . .     r . . . l . . . l .
    
    
    
    
    
                   DEFENDANTS'  MEMOMDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
                    FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM
                UNDER SECTION 11 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
    
           Defendants Coopers & Lybrand and William K. O'Brien
    (collectively ttC&Lfw)   submit this memorandum in support of their
    Motion for Summary Judgment on plaintiff's claim under section 11
    of the Securities Act of 1933,  15 U.S.C.  §77k.
           The section  11 claim is the only basis on which plaintiff
    does or can assert federal jurisdiction.         Plaintiff's remaining
    claims for negligence and negligent misrepresentation arise under
    state law and are subject to discretionary dismissal by this
    Court if the federal claim is dismissed.         See United Mine Workers
    of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966).
           This Motion turns on a simple, indisputable fact: Plaintiff
    and its predecessors never acquired any NDS stock.         Because
    recovery under section 11 is only available to purchasers of
    securities, plaintiff has no claim.
    
    
    
         Section  I1 creates a right of action against certain persons
    in connection with a false securities registration statement.
    However, that right of action is available only to a  "person
    acquiring such security," that is, a security issued pursuant to
    the registration statement in question.      Plaintiff alleges that
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • DEFENDANTS' MEMOMDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
  • Defendants Coopers & Lybrand and William K. O'Brien submit this memorandum in support of
  • This Motion turns on a simple, indisputable fact: Plaintiff
  • However, that right of action is available only to a "person acquiring such security," that
  • Plaintiff alleges that it is the assignee of and/or the successor to two entities, Contel
  • Third Amended Complaint, l/717-22.l The undisputed facts -- set forth in the agreement and
  • a merger was effected -- NDS was merged into Contel Subsidiary -- and as a consequence Contel
  • plaintiff lacks standing to pursue a section 11 claim and that claim should be dismissed.
  • The action, brought under several federal statutes, arose out of those defendants' alleged
  • the Court allowed a motion by Contel and CSC to amend their complaint by filing a Second
  • At a July 20, 1989 pre-trial conference, counsel for Contel and other parties advised the
  • Count I of the Third Amended Complaint seeks the difference between the price purportedly
  • make the statements therein not misleading,
  • Though plaintiff would cloak the Merger in the guise of a stock purchase, there was no stock
  • the transaction was a statutory merger "in accordance with the provisions of the Delaware
  • Thus, contrary to VERSYSS' conclusory allegation that Contel acquired the stock of NDS, the

  • 3 . AFFDVT STEVEN W PHILLIPS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    EXHIBIT
    NDS MERGER CORPORATION
    AFFIDAVIT
    HERETO
    CONTEL
    DISTRICT
    RELEVANT PORTION
    AGREEMENT
    NORTHERN DATA SYSTEMS
    CHRISTIAN
    CERTIFICATE
    SECURITIES ACT
    PLAN
    REORGANIZATION
    CONTINENTAL TELECOM
    FOUNDING STOCKHOLDERS
    PURSUANT
    HOFFMAN
    COMBINED PROXY STATEMENT-PROSPECTUS
    ACCORDANCE
    FORM S-15
    AMENDMENTS THERETO
    LLPROSPECTUSLT
    PROSPECTUS
    CHRISTIAN M/HOFFMAN
    PAINS
    PENALTIES
    PERJURY
    HEREBY CERTIFVTHAT
    
                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                               DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
    
    .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  ...*   ..
    VERSYSS INCORPORATED,                    ..
             Plaintiff,                      ..
    V .                                                    Civil Action
                                             l
                                             .             No. B
    COOPERS & LYBRAND, A                     .
    Partnership, and WILLIAM                 .                ~`5%657   '
                                                                                     -,C.  E,:.   ~    
                                                                                ;*," 22 ,/A>           
    K. O'BRIEN, As Managing                  .                                  ,-,a  &.-  .           
                                                                                 r- ,-
    Partner of Coopers & Lybrand, .                                                             r tL,.,,
                                                                               ,"-   ,,
                                                                               u" ,,...,
                                                                              -* Q+,. I'               
                                                                                                       
                                              .                               ,,
                                                                               '-; :.                  
                                                                              2 L ) I ,I
             Defendants.                      .                              .-I- - .,                 
                                                                             1, _ 7.                   
                                                                                                       
                                                                                      ,A.,
                                              .                              " ,"' *'.'-               
                                                                             ., * c *                  
    . . . . . . . . . . . l . . . .                                         7-1  _                     
                                                                                                       
    
                                                                                                     
                                                                            1  +;                      
                                                                                                       
    
                                                                           A-:  p,   :.I.              
                                                                           5  >  -.c;   ë...-          
                                                                                              -,*,
                                                                                              ,d-í     
                            AFFIDAVIT OF STEVEN W. PHILLIPS                                   -7  -
    
             Steven W. Phillips, for his affidavit, deposes and says as
    follows:
    
             1 .    I am a member of the bar of the Commonwealth of
    Massachusetts and this  Court.                 I make this affidavit in support
    
    of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Claim
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • Under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, dated October 29,
  • Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true copy of the
  • relevant portion of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization by and among Continental Telecom
  • Corporation), NDS Merger Corporation, Northern Data Systems, Inc.
  • and certain founding stockholders, pursuant to which NDS was merged into NDS Merger
  • true copy of the complete Merger Agreement is included in Exhibit B to the Affidavit of
  • Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true copy of the relevant portion of a combined proxy
  • A true copy of the complete Prospectus is included in Exhibit B to the Affidavit of Christian
  • Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true copy of the Certificate of Merger of Northern Data
  • Signed under the pains and penalties of perjury this 29th day of October,
  • HEREBY CERTIFVTHAT AT41.1ECOPv@FTHEABOVE

  • 4 . DEF MTN FR SUMMARY JDGMNT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    NDSM
    HOFFMAN AFF
    STOCK
    VERSYSS
    NDS
    DEFENDANTS
    MERGER
    COMMON STOCK
    PURSUANT
    EXS
    AGREEMENT
    LITIGATION
    NDS COMPANIES
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    PERUGINI
    VCM
    COOPERS
    LYBRAND
    MATERIAL FACTS
    AFFIDAVIT
    CHRISTIAN
    AUDIT
    MARSHALL
    COMPLAINT
    PUBLIC OFFERING
    SHARES
    SHORT-TERM NOTE
    STOCK PURCHASE
    CBSD
    
                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                               DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
    
    . . ...*     . *  l     ,.*  . . l .
                                            .
    VERSYSS INCORPORATED,                   ..
          Plaintiff,                        l
    
    
    
    V.                                   l
    
    
                                         l
    COOPERS & LYBRAND, A                 .
    Partnership, and WILLIAM             .
    K. O'BRIEN, As Managing              .
    Partner of Coopers  & Lybrand, ..
          Defendants.                    ..
    ..-.  l . . . l . . . . . . .
    
    
    
    
    
                     DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    
          Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure  56, defendants
    Coopers  & Lybrand and William K. O'Brien (collectively  "C&L")
    move for summary judgment dismissing the claims of VERSYSS,
    Incorporated ("VERSYSS').
          The grounds for this Motion, as set forth more fully in a
    memorandum of law filed herewith, are the following:         VERSYSS'
    claims are asserted against C&L as the purported "assignee" of
    claims of Contel Corporation and as the purported  successor-in-
    interest to a Contel Corporation subsidiary, Contel Systems
    Corporation.      VERSYSS' assertion of these claims against C&L is
    inconsistent with the discharge of the common liability of all
    defendants, including C&L, recognized by the filing of a related
    state court action against C&L for contribution.         VERSYSS must be
    
    
    
    judicially estopped to deny that discharge of liability in this
    action.       Further, VERSYSS' claims contravene  fundamental
    principles of restitution and contribution, and should be barred.
              There is no dispute of material fact, and C&L is entitled to
    judgment as a matter of law.       While the factual context of the
    complex transactions that purportedly give rise to VERSYSS'
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Partner of Coopers & Lybrand,
  • Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, defendants Coopers & Lybrand and William K.
  • claims are asserted against C&L as the purported "assignee" of claims of Contel Corporation
  • While the factual context of the complex transactions that purportedly give rise to VERSYSS'
  • These undisputed documents are made exhibits to the affidavit of Christian M. Hoffman, filed
  • Hereinafter all references to the Affidavits of Peter J. Marshall or Christian M. Hoffman are
  • referred to as the "NIX Companies.") Thereafter, until the merger with Contel and its
  • The NDS Companies were, at all relevant times until the Contel acquisition in July, 1985,
  • Hoffman Aff., Ex.
  • As of August 2, 1984, the date of the "NDS Public Offering," TK&K beneficially owned 57.1% of
  • Pursuant to the NDSM Public Offering, 600,000 shares of NDSM treasury common stock and
  • C&L's audit reports on financial statements of the NDS Companies were included in a
  • A, pp. 25-44 and NDMS Prospectus cover sheet; Third Amended Complaint, 1[119-10.
  • On or about May 17, 1985, Contel, its subsidiary NDS Merger Corp., NDSM and TK&K entered into
  • directors and officers of NDSM, including Perugini, also received substantial distributions.
  • Hoffman Aff., Exs.
  • entered into among Contel Business Systems, VERSYSS Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation,
  • Keene had caused VCM to be organized in 1988 and was its principal, if not sole, stockholder
  • Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement at Section 11.13, the parties agreed "to resolve
  • and CBSD from the NDSM Defendants and a stipulation of dismissal were in turn to be delivered

  • 5 . AFFDVT PETER J MARSHALL

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PARTNER
    AUDIT
    NORTHERN DATA SYSTEMS
    NDSM
    COOPERS
    LYBRAND
    PETER
    CONTEL
    COMMON STOCK
    DEFENDANTS
    AFFIDAVIT
    MARSHALL
    EMPLOYEE
    LINDSM1L
    CAPITAL STRUCTURE
    OWNERSHIP
    THOMPSON
    DAVID
    KEENE
    MATTHEW MAGGIO
    ROBERT
    AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    AFORESAID INDIVIDUALS
    SOLE OWNERS
    PUBLIC OFFERING
    PRIOR
    ACQUISITION
    PERFORMING AUDIT
    REGULAR PROFESSIONAL FEES
    
                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                     FOR THE                          ,.-,
                                                                      b;-
                           DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                  i .I
    
    
    VERSYSS INCORPORATED,
                      Plaintiff,
               V .
    
    COOPERS  & LYBRAND, A Partnership,
    and WILLIAM K. O'BRIEN, As Managing
    Partner of Coopers & Lybrand,
                      Defendants.
    
                         AFFIDAVIT OF PETER J. MARSHALL
    
    Hillsborough, ss.
         Peter J. Marshall deposes and says as follows:
         1.     I am a partner of the firm of certified public
    accountants of Coopers  & Lybrand  ("C&L"),  defendant in this
    action.    I make this affidavit in support of  C&L's motion for
    
    summary  judgment, dated December 1, 1989.
    
         2.    Commencing in or about May, 1981 C&L undertook to
    provide audit and other services to two affiliated New Hampshire
    corporations, Northern Data  Systems,  Inc. ("NDSNH")  and Northern
    Data Systems of New England, Inc. (I'NDSNE"), single-source
    suppliers of integrated turnkey business computer  systems  which
    included proprietary and generic software and computer hardware
    manufactured by others.     Thereafter, until merger with Contel
    Corporation  ("Contel")  and its subsidiary on July 16, 1985, C&L
    provided audit and other services to NDSNH, NDSNE and their
    successor, Northern Data Systems, Inc., a Massachusetts
    
    
    
    corporation (lINDSM1l) (collectively the "NDS  Companies"). I
    personally was involved with all audit work performed by C&L for
    the NDS Companies and with certain other work performed by C&L
    from 1981 through July 16, 1985.          During this period I became
    acquainted with the capital structure of the NDS Companies and
    with the ownership of the NDS Companies.
            3.    At no time did I ever own any Common Stock of any of
    the NDS Companies.      Representation letters executed by
    Peter A. Thompson, David 0. Keene, Matthew Maggio and/or
    Robert J. Keyes issued periodically between October 16, 1981 and
    July 31, 1984 confirmed during the period that C&L audited
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • COOPERS & LYBRAND, A Partnership, and WILLIAM K. O'BRIEN, As Managing Partner of Coopers &
  • Defendants.
  • AFFIDAVIT OF PETER J. MARSHALL
  • Peter J. Marshall deposes and says as follows:
  • I am a partner of the firm of certified public accountants of Coopers & Lybrand,
  • Commencing in or about May, 1981 C&L undertook to provide audit and other services to two
  • corporation (lINDSM1l).
  • I personally was involved with all audit work performed by C&L for the NDS Companies and with
  • acquainted with the capital structure of the NDS Companies and with the ownership of the NDS
  • At no time did I ever own any Common Stock of any of the NDS Companies.
  • Representation letters executed by Peter A. Thompson, David 0.
  • Keene, Matthew Maggio and/or Robert J. Keyes issued periodically between October 16, 1981 and
  • I am not aware of any C&L partner or employee who: a) owned any NDSM Common Stock at any
  • C&L ever obtained as a result of its performing audit and other services for the NDSM

  • 6 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COOPERS
    LYBRAND
    NDS
    VERSYSS
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    NDS MERGER CORPORATION
    CONTEL SYSTEMS
    PLAINTIFF
    DEFENDANTS
    PARTIES
    MASSACHUSETTS
    COMMON STOCK
    COMPLAINT
    REPORTS
    SOLE
    AUDIT REPORTS
    REPRESENTATIONS
    ACCOUNTING
    CONNECTION
    MERGER AGREEMENT
    CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
    REGISTRATION STATEMENT
    MATERIAL FACT
    PROXY STATEMENT-PROSPECTUS
    STATES DISTRICT COURT
    CIVIL ACTION
    PUBLIC OFFERING
    PROSPECTUS
    MARKET PRICE
    
                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  c
                      FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
    
    
    
    VERSYSS Incorporated,
                     Plaintiff,                          Civil Action
                                                         No.
    V .
                                           ;
    COOPERS  & LYBRAND, A Partnership, )88-l                             K  '
    and WILLIAM K. O'BRIEN, As
    Managing Partner of Coopers  &         ;
    Lybrand,
                                           ;
                     Defendants.           1
    
    
                                    COMPLAINT
    Introduction
           Reference is made to pending Civil Action No. 88-121-K
    captioned Contel Corporation, et al. v. Peter A. Thompson,
    et al.  (D. Mass.) which is related. This Complaint is being
    filed to commence an action separate from Civil Action No.
    88-121-K; however, this action will be prosecuted only in the
    event that the Court does not permit  amendxxnt of the pleadings
    of Civil Action No. 88-121-K (1) to substitute VERSYSS
    Incorporated as the sole plaintiff, (2) to dismiss Contel
    Corporaticn  and Contel Systems Corp. as parties  plainriff, with
    prejudice, with respect to all  deferA
                                                ..,ants  other than Coopers &
    Lybrand, and with respect tc  ciaims against Coopers  & Lybrand
    which they had at one time as plaintiffs,  <3) to  dis.miss,  with
    prejudice, defendants  Thompscn,  Keene,  Keyes,  Perugini,
    
    
    
    G a l l a n t ,    Green, Boss and Reilly as parties defendant, and  (4)
    to dismiss, without prejudice, the third-party complaints
    against Coopers & Lybrand filed by defendants Thompson, Keene,
    Keyes and Perugini, as a result of their dismissal, with
    prejudice, as defendants.
    
    
    Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Venue
            1.         This Court has jurisdiction over the subject  matter  of
    this action under Section 22 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15
    U.S.C.  §  77v, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 1332, and pursuant to the
    doctrine of  pendent jurisdiction with respect to Count II of
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT c
  • FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
  • VERSYSS Incorporated,
  • Reference is made to pending Civil Action No. 88-121-K captioned Contel Corporation, et al.
  • This Complaint is being filed to commence an action separate from Civil Action No. 88-121-K;
  • Lybrand, and with respect tc ciaims against Coopers & Lybrand which they had at one time as
  • G a l l a n t, Green, Boss and Reilly as parties defendant, and to dismiss, without
  • Systems Corporation, with a name change, and the successor-in-interest to Contel Business
  • VERSYSS is the sole holder and the sole owner of claims against the defendants, formerly held
  • Plaintiff VERSYSS is a Delaware corporation having a usual place of business at One Dedham
  • By a prospectus and registration statement dated August 2, 1984, NDS and certain shareholders
  • The prospectus and registration statement for the shares sold in the NDS ?ublic Offering
  • be referred to as an expert on accounting and auditing matters in the prospectus and
  • Those financial statements were certified by Coopers & Lybrand without qualification, by
  • At the time that Coopers & Lybrand performed its audits of the NDS financial statements and
  • NDS Merger Corporation and Contel also have stated and represented, and VERSYSS therefore
  • In addition to being executed in Massachusetts, the Merger Agreement was largely negotiated
  • -23X made numercus representations and warranties to NDS Merger Corporation and Contel
  • contain any untrue statement of any material fact
  • The audited financial sta'cements of NDS for the fiscal years ended May 31, 1982, 1983 and
  • Coopers & Lybrand expressly consented to be referred to as an expert on accounting and on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting."
  •    |