 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
DOCKET
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PRI AUTOMATION DEFENDANT DOCKET AMRAM RASIEL MITCHELL TYSON MORDECHAI WIESLER CHAN COURT DISTRICT COURT MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON CIVIL DOCKET DKT SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT JUDGE KEETON AMOUNT FEE |
Case docket was last updated on: 12/07/00.
Docket as of December 7, 2000 9:36 pm Page 1
Proceedings include all events.
1:00cv12398 Chan v. PRI Automation, Inc., et al
U.S. District Court
U.S. District Court - Massachusetts (Boston)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 00-CV-12398
Chan v. PRI Automation, Inc., et al Filed:
11/20/00
Assigned to: Judge Robert E. Keeton Jury demand: Plaintiff
Demand: $0,000 Nature of Suit: 160
Lead Docket: None Jurisdiction: Federal
Question
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
KAI CHAN, on behalf of himself Stephen Moulton
and all others similarly [COR LD NTC]
situated Nancy F. Gans
Plaintiff [COR LD NTC]
Moulton & Gans, LLP
133 Federal Street
12th Floor
Boston, MA 02110-1200
617-369-7979
v.
PRI AUTOMATION, INC.
Defendant
AMRAM RASIEL
Defendant
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS CLASS PERIOD COMMON STOCK AUTOMATION MISLEADING PLAINTIFF SECURITIES ACT DISSEMINATION MANUFACTURING INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS MATERIALS TYSON PRICE MEMBERS SEMICONDUCTOR FACTORY AUTOMATION MATERIAL FACTS CONNECTION EXCHANGE ACT RELEVANT TIMES SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY MATERIALLY FALSE PRODUCTION REGISTRATION STATEMENT EXPERIENCING MISREPRESENTATIONS TURBOSTOCKER VIOLATIONS |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
KAI CHAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others ) No.
Similarly Situated, )) CLASS ACTION
Plaintiff, ))
vs. ) COMPLAINT FOR
) THE
PRI AUTOMATION, INC., AMRAM RASIEL ) ACT OF 1934
MITCHELL G. TYSON, AND MORDECHAI )
WIESLER, )) Plaintiff
Defendants. ) Trial By Jury
))
)
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is a class action on behalf of a class (the "Class") of all persons who
purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of PRI Automation, Inc. ("PRI" or the
"Company") between January 27, 2000 and September 11, 2000 (the "Class Period), seeking to
pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("1934 Act").
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2. Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to the 1934 Act as amended (15 U.S.C.
§§ 78j(b) and 78t(a)) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5).
3. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant
the 1934 Act (15 U.S.C. § 78aa) and 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
4. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to § 27 of the 1934 Act, 15 U.S.C.
and 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Many of the acts and transactions giving rise to the violations of law
complained of herein, including the preparation and dissemination to the investing public of false
and misleading information, occurred in this District and PRI maintains its principal executive
offices in this District.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
