LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PLC SYSTEMS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: PS64023, CourtName: CLASS ACTION CASES, State: MA Massachusetts, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>PS64023, Plc Systems, Patients, Common Stock, Heart Laser, Tmr, Fda, Class Action, Drug Administration, Food, Medical Therapy, Endpoint, Statistically Significant, Review, Control Group, Coronary Artery Disease, Misleading, Class Period, Myocardial Perfusion, Allegations, Controlled Study, Clinical Studies, Materially Misleading, Medical Management, Advisory Panel Meeting, Mortality Rate, Preparation, Critical Care Medicine, Entry, Eaf, Lee Hibbs, Docket, Robert, Rudko, Scheduling, District Court , ContentID: 120246264

Case Documents
1 1998-09-29 DOCKET
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114831
4 pages
PDF
2 1997-09-02 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114830
21 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 2 documents , 25 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . DOCKET

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
EAF
COURT
LEE HIBBS
DOCKET
ROBERT
RUDKO
SCHEDULING
DISTRICT COURT
RICHARD
CONSOLIDATION
CONFERENCE
THEREAFTER
FEE
PAID
EDIT
BAYLESS
RONALD BRAUMAN
JAY HARNAGE
STILZ
GEORGE
LAMOTHE
CYR
PLC SYSTEMS
SCHEDULING ORDER
CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT
MOTION
DISMISS
RESPONSES
BRIEFS


Case docket was last updated on: 11/03/99.


Docket as of September 29, 1998 10:08 pm                       Page 1

Proceedings include all events.
1:97cv11989       Bayless, et al v. PLC Systems, Inc., et al                  CLOSED

                                                                    CLOSED
                           U.S. District Court
            U.S. District Court - Massachusetts (Boston)

                  CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 97-CV-11989

Bayless, et al v. PLC Systems, Inc., et al                          Filed:
09/02/97
Assigned to: Judge Richard G. Stearns                Jury demand: Plaintiff
Demand: $0,000                                       Nature of Suit: 160
Lead Docket: 97-CV-11737                             Jurisdiction: Federal
Question
Dkt# in other court: None

Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act


RICHARD BAYLESS                       Jeffrey C Block
     Plaintiff                        [COR LD NTC]
                                      Berman, DeValerio & Pease
                                      One Liberty Square
                                      Boston, MA 02109
                                      617-542-8300


RONALD BRAUMAN                        Jeffrey C Block
     Plaintiff                        (See above)
                                      [COR LD NTC]


M. JAY HARNAGE                        Jeffrey C Block
     Plaintiff                        (See above)
                                      [COR LD NTC]


RICHARD A. STILZ                      Jeffrey C Block
     Plaintiff                        (See above)
                                      [COR LD NTC]
SNIPPETS:
  • Case docket was last updated on:
  • U.S. District Court - Massachusetts
  • MAX LEE HIBBS
  • Fee Status: paid
  • [Edit date 09/04/97]
  • Robert C. Rudko in 1:97-cv-11989,
  • 1:97-cv-11989 [Entry date 09/04/97]
  • Bayless in 1:97-cv-11989, Ronald Brauman in 1:97-cv-11989,
  • M. Jay Harnage in 1:97-cv-11989, Richard A. Stilz in
  • 1:97-cv-11989, George E. Lamothe in 1:97-cv-11989, Ken St.
  • Cyr in 1:97-cv-11989, PLC Systems, Inc. in 1:97-cv-11989,
  • 10/30/97 -- Case closed administratively due to consolidation with
  • 12/18/97 -- Scheduling conference held.
  • Court enters scheduling order
  • A consolidated amended complaint must be filed
  • A motion to dismiss shall be filed by
  • with responses due 45 days thereafter.
  • Reply briefs shall

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    PLAINTIFFS
    PATIENTS
    COMMON STOCK
    HEART LASER
    TMR
    FDA
    CLASS ACTION
    DRUG ADMINISTRATION
    FOOD
    MEDICAL THERAPY
    ENDPOINT
    STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT
    REVIEW
    MEMBERS
    CONTROL GROUP
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
    MISLEADING
    CLASS PERIOD
    MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION
    ALLEGATIONS
    CONTROLLED STUDY
    CLINICAL STUDIES
    MATERIALLY MISLEADING
    MEDICAL MANAGEMENT
    ADVISORY PANEL MEETING
    MORTALITY RATE
    PREPARATION
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
    
    
    
    
    
                                         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                          DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
    
    _______________________________________
                                                             :
    RICHARD BAYLESS, RONALD BRAUMAN, :  Civil Action
    M. JAY HARNAGE, RICHARD A. STILZ,                        :  No. [97cv11989]
    GEORGE E. LAMOTHE and KEN ST. CYR,  :  [filed Sep. 2, 1997]
    on behalf of themselves                                  :
    and all others similarly situated,                       :
                          Plaintiff,                         : :
               v.                                            : :
    PLC SYSTEMS, INC.,                                       :
    ROBERT C. RUDKO, and                                     :
    MAX LEE HIBBS,                                           : :
                          Defendants.                        :
    _______________________________________ : :
                                          CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
    Plaintiffs by their attorneys, allege the following upon information and belief after due
    investigation by his counsel (except for those allegations pertaining to plaintiffs, which
    are based on personal knowledge). The investigation included, among other things,
    thorough review and analysis of (a) public statements of PLC and the individual
    defendants, (b) analysts' reports, (c) wire service releases, (d) articles in newspapers and
    periodicals, and (e) interviews by counsel with various experts who assisted in the
    preparation of the Complaint including experts in critical care medicine and Food and
    Drug Administration procedures.
    
                                           NATURE OF THE ACTION
    1. This is a class action on behalf of a class (the "Class") consisting of plaintiffs and all
    other persons or entities who purchased the common stock or traded in options of PLC
    Systems, Inc. ("PLC" or the "Company") during the period from August 15, 1996,
    through July 25, 1997, inclusive (the "Class Period") and were damaged thereby, to
    recover damages caused to the Class by defendants' violations of the federal securities
    laws and the common law.
    
                                          JURISDICTION AND VENUE
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiffs by their attorneys, allege the following upon information and belief after due
  • The investigation included, among other things, thorough review and analysis of public
  • This is a class action on behalf of a class consisting of plaintiffs and all other persons or
  • It is in the business of developing medical devices to provide patients suffering from
  • Because of their executive, managerial, and directorial positions with PLC, defendants Rudko
  • CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS
  • Excluded from the Class are the defendants, members of their immediate families, and any
  • New medical devices can be marketed in the United States for general use only if they have
  • Clinical studies are performed pursuant to a protocol, which is a written submission to the
  • After the conclusion of such a controlled study, the applicant provides complete data on the
  • The sponsor must demonstrate both that patients treated with the device have better results
  • For determination of efficacy, the FDA is especially concerned with "hard endpoints," and
  • If a device does not demonstrate statistically significant results according to its preset
  • Beginning before the beginning of the Class Period, PLC Systems was engaged in the
  • The primary endpoint was improved myocardial perfusion, or blood flow into the heart, and a
  • Defendants' False and Misleading Statements
  • TMR Group is 63% Lower Than in Medical Therapy Group
  • The study also provided a direct comparison of the mortality rate associated with TMR and
  • All of the foregoing statements and the press release taken as a whole were materially
  • Patients Previously Randomized to Medical Management
  • This data has been submitted to the Food and Drug Administration as a post-filing PreMarket
  •    |