LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PAYMENTECH INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: PI73736, CourtName: CLASS ACTION CASES, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>PI73736, Complaint, Paymentech, Stock, Dismiss, Class Period, Filings, Facts, Pleading, Allegations, Cir, Patsley, Scienter, Pslra, Pleading Standard, Inference, Prejudice, Transactions, Particularity, Securities Fraud, Processing Bank Card, Commercial Card, Chief Executive Officer, Allege Facts, Pleading Requirements, Group Pleading, Facts Showing, Revenue Growth , ContentID: 120246260

Case Documents
1   MEMO OPINION AND ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114814
30 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 30 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . MEMO OPINION AND ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
COMPLAINT
COURT
PAYMENTECH
STOCK
DISMISS
CLASS PERIOD
FILINGS
FACTS
PLEADING
ALLEGATIONS
CIR
PATSLEY
SCIENTER
PSLRA
PLEADING STANDARD
INFERENCE
PREJUDICE
TRANSACTIONS
PARTICULARITY
SECURITIES FRAUD
PROCESSING BANK CARD
COMMERCIAL CARD
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ALLEGE FACTS
PLEADING REQUIREMENTS
GROUP PLEADING
FACTS SHOWING
REVENUE GROWTH
                            ReceiveG  - / 0 9 / 2 0 0 0   16:OO  on  Line  4  f o r   CS0504  *  Pg





RAFFAELE BRANCA, CAR
CONRAD, and  MICHAEL  P.
et al.,

            Plaintiffs,

V.                                                                       9  Civil Action No.

PAYMENTECH,  INC., F W A  FIRST USA                                      6                         
                                                                                                   
PAYMENTECH,  TNC., PAMELA                                                5                         
  i
H. PATSLEY,  and  DAVID W. TRUETZEL,  5                                                            
                                                                         §                         

            Defendants.                                                  4                         
                                                                                                   
                                      MEMORANDUM  OPINION  A N D  ORDLK

            Before  the  court
                                    is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs'  Second Amended

Complaint,  filed  November
                                         20, 1998. After careful consideration ofthe motion,

voluminous  supplemental filings submitted by the parties, and  the  applicable  law,  the
                                                                                                   
s

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and dismisses Plaintiffs' claims with  prejudice.

            1.      Fa

            Plaintiffs are a class ofpersons who purchased common  stock  ofDefendant  Paymentech, 

("Paymentech") during  the period  bctween January 22, 1997 and September 24,1997. Paymentech

is a corporation whose business involves the processing of electronic payments.  Paymentech's

business includes  processing bank  card  transactions,  issuing commercial card products,

commercial  card payments and information,  and providing  third-party  credit
                                                                                                   
SNIPPETS:
  • Complaint, filed November
  • Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and dismisses Plaintiffs' claims with prejudice.
  • Plaintiffs are a class ofpersons who purchased common stock ofDefendant Paymentech,
  • business includes processing bank card transactions, issuing commercial card products,
  • Defendant Pamela Patsley
  • was President and Chief Executive Officer of Paymentech during the class period.
  • unusual and related-party transactions in the last three quarters of the 1997 fiscal year.
  • ADDliCabk Pleading Standards
  • The court cannot dismiss Plaintiffs' claims under Ruie 12unless it appears beyond
  • doubt that they can prove no set of facts entitling them to relief.
  • The Plaintiffs' factual allegations are accepted as true when considering
  • Inc., 677 F.2d 1045, 1050 (S* Cir.
  • To state a claim for securities fraud in violation of section 10and Rule
  • The PSLRA has further reinforced this particularity requirement with respect to pleading
  • Scienter Reauirement
  • claims must allege facts demonstrating scienter.
  • must set forth specific facts to support an inference of fraud.
  • or allege facts showing a motive to commit fraud and a clear
  • Although the P S L M was not implicated in that case, the court did express, in dicta, its
  • to the supplemental filings submitted by the parties, reveals that since the parties
  • Plaintiffs' securities fraud claims are also subjcct to the special pleading requirements
  • instead constitute an attempt to use "group pleading" in order to allege fraud.
  • Paymentech had plans for a target of 2O-25% revenue growth.
  •    |