LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC COMPANY Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: PSC133153, CourtName: CLASS ACTION CASES, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>PSC133153, Pacsci, Entry, Solium, Judge Linda, Brower, Ballast, Mclaughlin, Fluorescent, Mot, Lighting, Edgar, Common Stock, Market, Continuous Dimming, Class Action, Fluorescent Lamps, Materially False, Electronic Ballast, Technology, Class Period, Misleading, Manufacturers, Debentures, United States, Sense-a-volt, Discovery Elgin Edwards, Elgin Edwards, Incandescent, Motion, Cfl, Incandescent Bulbs, Act, Settlement, Prototypes, Linear Fluorescent, Pla, Sheldon Kriegel, Compact Fluorescent , ContentID: 120246251

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114755
41 pages
PDF
2 1998-05-29 DOCKET
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114756
25 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 2 documents , 66 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SOLIUM
BALLAST
PLAINTIFFS
FLUORESCENT
LIGHTING
DEFENDANTS
COMMON STOCK
MARKET
CONTINUOUS DIMMING
FLUORESCENT LAMPS
MATERIALLY FALSE
ELECTRONIC BALLAST
BROWER
TECHNOLOGY
CLASS PERIOD
MISLEADING
MANUFACTURERS
DEBENTURES
UNITED STATES
SENSE-A-VOLT
INCANDESCENT
CFL
INCANDESCENT BULBS
PROTOTYPES
LINEAR FLUORESCENT
COMPACT FLUORESCENT
MICHAEL TSENTER
CALIFORNIA
OSSENMACHER


Samuel P. Sporn
Joel P. Laitman
SCHOENGOLD & SPORN, P.C.
233 Broadway
New York, NY 10279
Telephone: (212) 964-0046

Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr. (75284)
Nicole Lavallee (165755)
BERMAN, DEVALERIO, PEASE & TABACCO
425 California Street, Suite 2025
San Francisco, CA 94104-2205
Telephone: (415) 433-3200

Attorneys for Plaintiffs SHELDON KRIEGEL
and MICHAEL TSENTER

Kevin Prongay
John W. Borderud
Michael O'Keefe, Of Counsel
PRONGAY & BORDERUD
881 Alma Real Drive, Suite 211
Pacific Palisades, CA 90272
Telephone: (310) 573-3600

Robert S. Schachter
Catherine Anderson
ZWERLING, SCHACHTER & ZWERLING, LLP
767 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Telephone: (212) 223-3900

Attorneys for Plaintiff HAROLD WALLACH

                         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                        CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

_______________________________________
                                             )
SHELDON KRIEGEL, MICHAEL                     )  NO. SA CV-96-975 LHM (EEx)
TSENTER and HAROLD WALLACH, on               )
behalf of themselves and all others          )  FIRST AMENDED AND
similarly situated,                          )  CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
                                             )  FOR VIOLATIONS OF SECTIONS
Plaintiffs,                                  )  10(b) AND 20 OF THE SECURITIES
SNIPPETS:
  • Attorneys for Plaintiffs SHELDON KRIEGEL and MICHAEL TSENTER
  • CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
  • This action arises out of false, misleading, dramatic and systematic claims by PacSci that it
  • PacSci claimed it was the technological "leader" of a billion dollar electronic ballast its.
  • Fluorescent lighting is more energy efficient and less costly because it requires far less
  • The Continuous Dimming Compact Fluorescent Bulb and Ballast
  • PacSci also misrepresented it had developed and introduced an electronic ballast with
  • Defendants further claimed that the introduction of these products would drive fixture
  • Sense-a-Volt Technology and Ballasts
  • These products were allegedly going to "globalize" fixtures by allowing fixture manufacturers
  • Only crude hand-made prototypes existed.
  • The Company's Director of Engineering for Solium Products, Mark Martich, repeatedly informed
  • The Company terminated Martich after he wrote to Brower in March 1995, stating that the
  • These dramatic misrepresentations -- which defendant Brower would later concede were made Inc. ("Met
  • Moreover, the price of PacSci's 7-3/4% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due June 15, 2003
  • While dimming ballasts were available from other manufacturers, they required additional
  • 1994 purporting to introduce "a new generation of ultra compact fluorescent light systems

  • 2 . DOCKET

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFF
    JUDGE LINDA
    MCLAUGHLIN
    MOT
    BROWER
    EDGAR
    DEFENDANT
    CLASS ACTION
    COURT
    DISCOVERY ELGIN EDWARDS
    ELGIN EDWARDS
    MOTION
    ACT
    SETTLEMENT
    PLA
    SHELDON KRIEGEL
    PLAINTIFF SHELDON
    OPPOSING CNSL
    CERTIFICATION
    PROTECTIVE ORDER
    DEFENDANT RICHARD
    JOINT REPORT
    DECLARATION
    REJECTING DFTS
    OBJECTIONS
    STLMNT CONF
    SUPPORT
    RECOMMEND
    HAROLD WALLACH
    
    
    
    Case docket was last updated on: 05/29/98.
    
    
    Docket as of May 29, 1998 6:22 pm                          Page 1
    
    Proceedings include all events.                                                  TERMED
    8:96cv975            Sheldon Kriegel, et al v. Pacific Scientific C, et alTRANSF
                                                                           TERMED
    TRANSF
                                  U.S. District Court
                 Central District of California (Southern Div)
    
                          CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 96-CV-975
    
    Sheldon Kriegel, et al v. Pacific Scientific C, et al                  Filed:
    10/18/96
    Assigned to: Judge Linda H. McLaughlin                  Jury demand: Defendant
                    Referred to: Discovery Elgin Edwards
    Demand: $0,000                                          Nature of Suit: 850
    Lead Docket: None                                       Jurisdiction: Federal
    Question
    Dkt # : is 2:98-cv-04163
    
    Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
    
    
    SHELDON KRIEGEL, on behalf of            Samuel P Sporn
    himself and all others                    [term 12/30/96]
    similarly situated                       [COR LD NTC]
            plaintiff                        Joel P Laitman
         [term 12/30/96]                      [term 12/30/96]
                                             [COR LD NTC]
                                             Joel P Laitman
                                             (See above)
                                             [COR LD NTC]
                                             Jay P Saltzman
                                             [COR LD NTC]
                                             Christopher Lometti
                                             [COR LD NTC]
                                             Schoengold & Sporn
                                             233 Broadway
                                             New York, NY 10279
                                             212-964-0046
    
                                             Joseph J Tabacco, Jr
                                              [term 12/30/96]
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Referred to: Discovery Elgin Edwards
  • Cause: 15:78mSecurities Exchange Act
  • class action; by 11/8/96 pla to file notice of related
  • 11/8/96 joint report covering proposed litigation
  • schedule, prop date for hrg on certification, settlement
  • by Judge Linda
  • McLaughlin CR: none present [Entry date 10/24/96]
  • Edgar
  • court orders pla's mot to be
  • S Brower for clarification fo court's 11/11/96 order.
  • 11/11/96 on opposing cnsl by mail on 11/11/96.
  • 11/25/96 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION by plaintiff Sheldon Kriegel
  • 11/25/96 12 MEMORANDUM of P/A by plaintiff Sheldon Kriegel in support
  • 11/25/96 14 DECLARATION of Sheldon Kriegel by plaintiff Sheldon
  • 12/6/96 19 Memo of P&A in opposition by defendant Pacific Scientific
  • re settlement negos and any add'l pertinent information.
  • 1/6/97 44 NOTICE by defendant Richard V Plat,
  • 1/9/97 43 OBJECTIONS by plaintiff to exparte appl for modification of Pretrial Order #1;
  • 3/11/97 60 PROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiff of mot for protective order
  • on behalf of Harold Wallach in a specific cs by Judge
  • the Crt of the results pof the 5-28-97 stlmnt conf w/ Jdg
  • Irving & recommend a course of act w/ specific dts for
  • for order rejecting dfts' objections to pla's experts
  •    |