LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

OSICOM TECHNOLOGIES Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: OT103994, CourtName: CLASS ACTION CASES, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>OT103994, Exchange Act, Osicom Common Stock, Common Stock, Securities, Entry, District, Allegations, Individual Defendants, Wireless Pda, York, United States, Misleading Statements, Lead Plfs, Contract, Material Facts, Defendant Chadha, States District Court, Osicom, Chief Executive Officer, Class Period, Motion, Discovery, Securities Exchange, Securities Exchange Act, Public Statements, Grossmann Llp, Schachter Paul, Zwerling Schachter, California, Jurisdiction, Docket, Related Actns, Appoint , ContentID: 120246248

Case Documents
1 1999-06-23 CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE 99-CV-4321
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114716
4 pages
PDF
2 1999-06-10 CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE 99-CV-4822
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114717
3 pages
PDF
3 1999-05-05 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114718
10 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 3 documents , 17 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE 99-CV-4321

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ENTRY
MOTION
OSICOM
SECURITIES EXCHANGE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
RELATED ACTNS
APPOINT
APPROVE LEAD PLFS
CNSL
DOCKET
OSICOM TECHNOLOGIES
DEFENDANT
OSICOM PLFS GROUP
LEAD PLF PURS
LEAD PLFS CHOICE
MOTION HEARING
TODD AUGENBAUM
DISCOVERY
JAMES
MCMAHON
SUPPT
RELATED ACTNS AGNST
VIOLATIONS
CONSOLIDATE RELATED ACTNS
SELECTION
WDK
HLH
CAS
PROP ORDERS


Docket as of June 23, 1999 [retrieved 7/2/99]

Proceedings include all events.
2:99cv4321 Todd Augenbaum v. Osicom Tech Inc, et al
(Mcx)

                                                                        (Mcx)
                                U.S. District Court
                Central District of California (Western Div.)

                        CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 99-CV-4321

Todd Augenbaum v. Osicom Tech Inc, et al                                Filed:
04/22/99
Assigned to: Judge Manuel L. Real                        Jury demand: Plaintiff
                   Referred to: Discovery James W. McMahon
Demand: $0,000                                           Nature of Suit: 850
Lead Docket: None                                        Jurisdiction: Federal
Question
Dkt# in other court: None

Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act


TODD AUGENBAUM, individually               James Jay Seirmarco
and on behalf of all others                [COR LD NTC]
similarly situated                         Abbey Gardy & Squitieri
           plaintiff                       595 Market St
                                           Suite 2500
                                           San Francisco, CA 94105
                                           415-538-3725


     v.


OSICOM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
           defendant


PAR CHADAH
           defendant


JOHN GORMAN
           defendant
SNIPPETS:
  • Docket as of June 23,
  • Referred to: Discovery James W. McMahon
  • Cause: 15:78mSecurities Exchange Act
  • OSICOM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. defendant
  • jury demand [Entry date
  • 6/9/99 2 NOTICE by plaintiff Todd Augenbaum of related case
  • 99-4360 WDK, CV 99-4322 HLH, CV 99-4408 CAS
  • and to approve lead plfs choice of cnsl; motion hearing
  • order to appoint the Osicom plfs Group as lead plf purs to
  • suppt of motion for order to appoint the Osicom plfs Group
  • as lead plf purs to 21Dof the securities exchange
  • related actns agnst Osicom Technologies,
  • motion to consolidate related actns agnst Osicom
  • Inc for violations of the securities exchange
  • for approval of their selection of cnsl;
  • set for 10:00 7/19/99 Lodged 2 prop orders

  • 2 . CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE 99-CV-4822

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MCX
    DISCOVERY
    DOCKET
    PLAINTIFF CHESIN
    TARGET
    DEFENDANT
    OSICOM
    JAMES
    MCMAHON
    ANN
    JONES
    ROBERT
    JURY DEMAND
    PRO HAC VICE
    NON-RESIDENT
    ATTORNEY
    GANS
    RYAN
    POLIAKOFF
    SCHACHTER
    PAUL
    CERTIFICATION
    JAG
    CLASS ACTN CMP
    TRANSFER PURSUANT
    GENERAL ORDER
    INITIALS
    TRANSFEREE JUDGE
    COUNSEL
    
    
    
    Docket as of June 10, 1999 [retrieved 7/2/99]
    
    Proceedings include all events.
    2:99cv4822 Chesin & Co Target v. Osicom Tech Inc, et al
    (Mcx)
    
                                                                              (Mcx)
                                     U.S. District Court
                        Central District of California (Western Div.)
    
                             CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 99-CV-4822
    
    Chesin & Co Target v. Osicom Tech Inc, et al                              Filed:
    05/05/99
    Assigned to: Judge Manuel L. Real                         Jury demand: Plaintiff
                           Referred to: Discovery James W. McMahon
    Demand: $0,000                                            Nature of Suit: 850
    Lead Docket: None                                         Jurisdiction: Federal
    Question
    Dkt# in other court: None
    
    Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
    
    
    CHESIN & COMPANY TARGET                     Joseph J Tabacco, Jr
    BENEFIT PLAN, on behalf of                  [COR LD NTC]
    Itself and All Others                       Christopher T Heffelfinger
    Similarly Situated                          [COR LD]
               plaintiff                        Ritu Patel
                                                [COR LD]
                                                Berman DeValerio Pease &
                                                Tabacco
                                                425 California St
                                                Suite 2025
                                                San Francisco, CA 94104-2205
                                                415-433-3200
    
    
         v.
    
    
    OSICOM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
               defendant
    
    
    PAR CHADHA
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Docket as of June 10,
  • 2:99cv4822 Chesin & Co Target v. Osicom Tech Inc,
  • Referred to: Discovery James W. McMahon
  • OSICOM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. defendant
  • jury demand [Entry date 05/06/99]
  • Pro Hac Vice Application of Non-Resident Attorney
  • Robert S Gans, Ryan D. Poliakoff, Robert S. Schachter and
  • Paul C. Whalen mailed on 5/6/99
  • certification (jag)
  • 5/11/99 of Class actn cmp
  • 6/4/99 8 NOTICE by plaintiff Chesin & Co Target of related case
  • CV 99-4321 R (Mcx)
  • 6/8/99 7 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 224
  • Case referred from Discovery Ann I. Jones to Discovery
  • initials of the transferee Judge
  • (cc: all counsel)

  • 3 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    EXCHANGE ACT
    DEFENDANTS
    OSICOM COMMON STOCK
    COMMON STOCK
    SECURITIES
    MEMBERS
    DISTRICT
    ALLEGATIONS
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    WIRELESS PDA
    YORK
    UNITED STATES
    MISLEADING STATEMENTS
    CONTRACT
    MATERIAL FACTS
    DEFENDANT CHADHA
    STATES DISTRICT COURT
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    CLASS PERIOD
    PUBLIC STATEMENTS
    GROSSMANN LLP
    SCHACHTER PAUL
    ZWERLING SCHACHTER
    CALIFORNIA
    JURISDICTION
    TIMES RELEVANT HERETO
    DEFENDANT GORMAN
    SALES CONTRACT
    BLOOMBERG ARTICLE
    
    
    
    Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr. (75284)
    Christopher T. Heffelfinger (118058)
    Ritu Patel (172956)
    BERMAN, DeVALERIO, PEASE & TABACCO, P.C.
    425 California Street, Suite 2025
    San Francisco, CA 94104
    Telephone: (415) 433-3200
    
    Robert S. Gans
    Ryan D. Poliakoff
    BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER
      & GROSSMANN LLP
    1285 Avenue of the Americas
    New York, New York 10019
    (212) 554-1400
    
    Robert S. Schachter
    Paul C. Whalen
    ZWERLING SCHACHTER
    & ZWERLING, LLP
    767 Third Avenue
    New York, New York 10017
    (212) 223-3900
    
    Attorneys for Plaintiff
    
                               IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    
                           FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
    
    ____________________________________
                                                 )
    CHESIN & COMPANY TARGET                      )  Civil Action No. [99-CV-04822]
    BENEFIT PLAN, on behalf                      )
    of Itself and All Others                     )  CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
    Similarly Situated,                          )  [filed May 5, 1999]
                                                 )
                          Plaintiff,             )  JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
               -against-                         ) )
    OSICOM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,                   )
    PAR CHADHA and                               )
    JOHN H. GORMAN,                              ) )
                          Defendants.            )
    ____________________________________ )
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP
  • New York, New York 10019
  • Robert S. Schachter Paul C. Whalen
  • ZWERLING SCHACHTER & ZWERLING, LLP
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
  • All allegations made in this complaint are based on information and belief, except those
  • This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action under Section 27 of the
  • On December 31, 1998, plaintiff Chesin & Company Target Benefit Plan purchased 1,000 shares
  • At all times relevant hereto, defendant Par Chadha was Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and
  • As of May 21, 1998, defendant Gorman owned or controlled 47,000 shares of the Company's
  • Defendants Chadha and Gorman (collectively, the "Individual Defendants") reviewed or were
  • The defendants engaged in a common course of conduct from at least July 1, 1998, the day the
  • The members of the Class, as purchasers on these markets, are so numerous that joinder of all
  • whether the documents, releases, public statements, and filings with the SEC made by
  • Confronted with having lost more than $30 million over the prior four years, defendants
  • The Wireless PDA was reportedly designed to allow users to both transmit and receive a video
  • As reported by Bloomberg on April 21, 1999 (the April 21 Bloomberg Article), Osicom issued a
  • Defendant Chadha reportedly revealed when interviewed that the $90 Million Contract was
  • Throughout the Class Period, defendants individually and in concert, directly and indirectly,
  • Through their positions of control and authority as officers and/or directors of the Company,
  •    |