 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
DOCKET
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ENTRY APPOINT LEAD MOTION OPEN MARKET LEAD PLAINTIFF SHAH LIAISON COUNSEL FELGOISE MOVANT JEFF BUSSGANG EICHHORN SHIKHAR GHOSH CONSOLIDATE DOCKET ARNOLD ABRAMS SHAH ENGINEERING ILA SHAH LIVING SHAH LIVING RONALD MATROS EOD SUPPORT WITHDRAW COURT NANCY KAPLAN PLAINTIFFS EXTEND TIME MEMORANDUM |
Case docket was last updated on: 10/26/00.
Docket as of October 26, 2000 9:34 pm Page 1
Proceedings include all events.
1:00cv11162 Felgoise, et al v. Open Market Inc., et al
LEAD
LEAD
U.S. District Court
U.S. District Court - Massachusetts (Boston)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 00-CV-11162
Felgoise, et al v. Open Market Inc., et al Filed:
06/14/00
Assigned to: Judge Nancy Gertner
Demand: $0,000 Nature of Suit: 160
Lead Docket: None Jurisdiction: Federal
Question
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
ROY FELGOISE Nancy F. Gans
Plaintiff [COR LD NTC]
Moulton & Gans, LLP
133 Federal Street
12th Floor
Boston, MA 02110-1200
617-369-7979
LEONARD SEIDMAN Nancy F. Gans
Plaintiff (See above)
[COR LD NTC]
ED RABIN Nancy F. Gans
Consolidated Plaintiff [COR LD NTC]
Moulton & Gans, LLP
133 Federal Street
12th Floor
Boston, MA 02110-1200
617-369-7979
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CLASS PERIOD COMMON STOCK PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS SECURITIES ACT CLASS ACTION MISLEADING INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS ARTIFICIALLY INFLATED PRICES MEMBERS MATERIALLY FALSE BUSINESS SHARES MATERIAL FACTS ACTION PURSUANT EXCHANGE ACT MANAGEMENT COMPETITION DISSEMINATION COMPETITIVE INTERNET GROWTH E-BUSINESS MISREPRESENTATIONS GOLDEN GATE MATERIAL ADVERSE INFORMATION FRAUDULENT SCHEME DEFENDANT MATROS PARTICIPATION CUSTOMIZED E-COMMERCE APPLICATIONS |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
)
ROY FELGOISE and LEONARD SEIDMAN, ) No. 00 CV 11162NG
On Behalf of Themselves and All Others )
Similarly Situated, ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
FOR VIOLATION OF THE
Plaintiff, ) ) SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
vs. ) 1934
)
OPEN MARKET, INC., JEFF ) )
BUSSGANG, GARY EICHHORN, )
SHIKHAR GHOSH, AND RONALD )
J. MATROS, ) Plaintiff Demands A
Trial By Jury
Defendants.
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is a class action on behalf of a class (the "Class") of all persons who
purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of Open Market, Inc. ("Open
Market" or the "Company") between November 8, 1999, and April 18, 2000 (the
"Class Period), seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 ("1934 Act").
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2. Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to the 1934 Act as amended (15 U.S.C.
§§ 78j(b) and 78t(a)) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R.
§ 240.10b-5).
3. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to § 27
of the 1934 Act (15 U.S.C. § 78aa) and 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
4. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to § 27 of the 1934 Act, 15 U.S.C.
§ 78aa and 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Many of the acts and transactions giving rise to
the violations of law complained of herein, including the preparation and
dissemination to the investing public of false and misleading information, occurred
in this District.
5. In connection with the acts, conduct and other wrongs complained of herein, the
defendants used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce.
THE PARTIES
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
