LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

OFFICEMAX INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: OI65444, CourtName: CLASS ACTION CASES, State: OH Ohio, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>OI65444, Officemax, Core Business Segment, Inventory, Stock, Merchandise, Michael Feuer, Chief Executive Officer, Superstores, Misleading, Rutherford, Management, Publicly Traded Options, Selling, Chairman, Improving, Merchandise Assortment, Purchasers, Vice President, Business Model, Sold Office Supplies, Gross Profit, Store Openings, Reported Record High, Operating Income, Financial Reporting, Accounting Principles, Fasb Statement, Enterprise, Bullish Representations , ContentID: 120246237

Case Documents
1   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114673
12 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 12 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CORE BUSINESS SEGMENT
INVENTORY
STOCK
MERCHANDISE
MICHAEL FEUER
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
SUPERSTORES
MISLEADING
RUTHERFORD
MANAGEMENT
PUBLICLY TRADED OPTIONS
SELLING
CHAIRMAN
IMPROVING
MERCHANDISE ASSORTMENT
PURCHASERS
VICE PRESIDENT
BUSINESS MODEL
SOLD OFFICE SUPPLIES
GROSS PROFIT
DEFENDANTS
STORE OPENINGS
REPORTED RECORD HIGH
OPERATING INCOME
FINANCIAL REPORTING
ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
FASB STATEMENT
ENTERPRISE
BULLISH REPRESENTATIONS




                                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                               NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
                                                     EASTERN DIVISION


            BERNARD FIDEL, On Behalf of Himself                        )  No.
            and All Others Similarly Situated,                         ) CLASS ACTION
                                    Plaintiffs,                        ))
                vs.                                                    )) COMPLAINT FOR
            OFFICEMAX, INC.,                                           ) VIOLATION OF THE
                                                                       )
            MICHAEL FEUER and JEFFREY L.                                    SECURITIES EXCHANGE
                                                                       )
            RUTHERFORD,                                                     ACT OF 1934
                                                                       ))
                                    Defendants.                        )
            ________________________________________ )
                                                                              DEMAND FOR JURY
                                                                            TRIAL

                                                       OVERVIEW

       1. This is an action on behalf of all purchasers of the stock and publicly traded
       options of OfficeMax, Inc. ("OfficeMax" or the "Company") between 3/2/99 and
       9/30/99 (the "Class Period"). OfficeMax operates a chain of several hundred
       discount office supply superstores or warehouses selling a broad range of office
       supply products, including computers.

       2. Beginning on 3/2/99, when OfficeMax reported its 4thQ fiscal 1998 ("F98")
       results, OfficeMax, Michael Feuer (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) and
       Jeffrey L. Rutherford (Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer) made
       false and misleading statements about the successful realignment of OfficeMax's
       business model, the strong performance and positive momentum of OfficeMax's
       Core Business Segment (which sold office supplies, furniture and business
       machines excluding computers) and the Core Business Segment's improving
       profitability due to its enlarged merchandise assortment and effective inventory
       management. These bullish representations and forecasts artificially inflated
       OfficeMax's stock to a Class Period high of $12-1/8 on 5/18/99 from $7-5/8 just
       before the Class Period began. But then, on 9/30/99, OfficeMax revealed that its
       2ndH F99 and F00 financial results were going to be much worse than earlier
       forecast. OfficeMax's stock fell by over 32% in two days to $5 - the largest two-
       day percentage price decline in OfficeMax's history as a public company - on
       trading volume of over 10 million shares, and then continued to fall to as low as
       $4-1/2 per share, its lowest price ever, a drop from which it has not recovered.
SNIPPETS:
  • This is an action on behalf of all purchasers of the stock and publicly traded options of
  • OfficeMax operates a chain of several hundred discount office supply superstores or
  • Beginning on 3/2/99, when OfficeMax reported its 4thQ fiscal 1998 results, OfficeMax, Michael effective inventory management.
  • These bullish representations and forecasts artificially inflated OfficeMax's stock to a
  • Defendant Michael Feuer was, at all relevant times, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
  • Defendant Jeffrey L. Rutherford was, at all relevant times, Executive Vice President and
  • Feuer and Rutherford, the individual defendants, acted as controlling persons of OfficeMax
  • Each defendant is liable for participating in a fraudulent scheme and course of business that
  • They ran OfficeMax as "hands-on" managers, dealing with important issues facing OfficeMax's
  • focus on improving merchandise margins through an enhanced product
  • launched a major supply-chain management initiative in 1998.
  • OfficeMax's revised business model was not working, as its rapid expansion of the number of
  • focus on enhancing gross profit margin through a better product
  • The company believes the acceleration of store openings will be
  • Inc. today reported record high fiscal 1999 second quarter and first
  • half sales and operating income for the periods ended July 24,
  • focus on enhancing its merchandise assortment to emphasize
  • OfficeMax's reported financial results were materially false and misleading in violation of
  • The principle that interim financial reporting should be based upon the same accounting
  • The principle that financial reporting should provide information that is useful to present
  • The principle that financial reporting should provide information about the economic
  •    |