LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

OAKWOOD HOMES Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: OH70794, CourtName: CLASS ACTION CASES, State: NC North Carolina, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>OH70794, Oakwood, Loans, Credit, Class Period, Sales, Delinquency Rate, Standards, Credit Losses, Stock, Securities, Customers, Investors, Credit Scoring System, Underwriting Standards, Tightened Underwriting Standards, Common Stock, Securitizations, Prepayment, Class Action, Assured Investors, Exchange Act, Manufactured Housing, Approximates, Net Income, Remic Securitizations, Securities Analysts, Representations, Financial Services, Entry, Docket, District, George, Michael Kilbourne, Mediat , ContentID: 120246236

Case Documents
1 1998-12-09 DOCKET
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114672
3 pages
PDF
2 1997-04-22 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114671
41 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 2 documents , 44 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . DOCKET

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DOCKET
DEFENDANT
DISTRICT
COURT
GEORGE
MICHAEL KILBOURNE
MEDIAT
MIDDLE DISTRICT
NORTH CAROLINA
DURHAM
CIVIL DOCKET
DKT
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OAKWOOD HOMES GROUP
NICHOLAS
JURY DEMAND
EDIT


Docket as of December 9, 1998 [retrieved 1/10/99]

Proceedings include all events.                                               18BA
1:98cv1013 GROUP ONE LIMITED v. OAKWOOD HOMES GROUP, et al                    MEDIAT
                                                                              SO30
                                                                    18BA
MEDIAT
                                                                    SO30
                           U.S. District Court
                     Middle District of North Carolina (Durham)

                  CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 98-CV-1013

GROUP ONE LIMITED v. OAKWOOD HOMES GROUP, et al                     Filed:
11/18/98
Assigned to: UNASSIGNED                              Jury demand: Plaintiff
Demand: $0,000                                       Nature of Suit: 850
Lead Docket: None                                    Jurisdiction: Federal
Question
Dkt# in other court: None

Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act


GROUP ONE LIMITED, on behalf          MARTHA A. GEER
of itself and all others              [COR LD NTC]
similarly situated                    PATTERSON, HARKAVY & LAWRENCE
     plaintiff                        POB 27927
                                      RALEIGH, NC 27611
                                      919-755-1812

                                      BERNARD M. GROSS
                                      [COR LD NTC]
                                      DEBORAH R. GROSS
                                      [COR LD NTC]
                                      OFFICE OF BERNARD M. GROSS
                                      1500 WALNUT ST., 6TH FL.
                                      PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102
                                      215-561-3600

                                      MARC HENZEL
                                      [COR LD NTC]
                                      LAW OFFICES OF MARC S. HENZEL
                                      210 W. WASHINGTON SQ.
                                      PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-3514
                                      215-625-9999
SNIPPETS:
  • Docket as of December 9,
  • MEDIAT
  • U.S. District Court
  • Middle District of North Carolina (Durham)
  • CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #:
  • Dkt# in other court: None
  • Cause: 15:78mSecurities Exchange Act
  • OAKWOOD HOMES GROUP
  • NICHOLAS J. ST. GEORGE
  • jury demand [Entry date 11/19/98]
  • [Edit date 11/19/98]
  • C. MICHAEL KILBOURNE

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    LOANS
    CREDIT
    DEFENDANTS
    CLASS PERIOD
    SALES
    DELINQUENCY RATE
    STANDARDS
    CREDIT LOSSES
    STOCK
    SECURITIES
    CUSTOMERS
    INVESTORS
    CREDIT SCORING SYSTEM
    UNDERWRITING STANDARDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    TIGHTENED UNDERWRITING STANDARDS
    COMMON STOCK
    SECURITIZATIONS
    PREPAYMENT
    CLASS ACTION
    ASSURED INVESTORS
    EXCHANGE ACT
    MANUFACTURED HOUSING
    APPROXIMATES
    NET INCOME
    REMIC SECURITIZATIONS
    SECURITIES ANALYSTS
    REPRESENTATIONS
    FINANCIAL SERVICES
    
    
    
                                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                 MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
    
    GROUP ONE LIMITED, KEN RUTT AND                             |
    RONALD E. DAVIS, et al., On Behalf of Themselves  |
    and All Others Similarly Situated,                          |
                                                                |
                          Plaintiffs,                           |
               vs.                                              |
                                                                |  Master File No. 98-1013
    OAKWOOD HOMES CORP., NICHOLAS ST.                           |
    GEORGE and C. MICHAEL KILBOURNE,                            |
                                                                |
                          Defendants.                           |
    _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _               |
                                                                |
    IN RE OAKWOOD HOMES CORPORATION                             |
    SECURITIES LITIGATION                                       |  CLASS ACTION
    _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _               |
    This Document Relates To:                                   |
                                                                |
    ALL ACTIONS.                                                |
    _____________________________________________ |  Plaintiffs Demand A
                                                                |  Trial By Jury
                                                                |
    
         PLAINTIFFS' CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                       FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
    
    
                                             NATURE OF THE ACTION
    
    1. This is a securities class action on behalf of all purchasers of the common stock of
    Oakwood Homes Corporation ("Oakwood" or the "Company"), other than defendants and
    certain related parties, between April 22, 1997 and July 21, 1998, inclusive (the "Class
    Period"), alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange
    Act"). Oakwood produces, sells and finances manufactured housing, serving retail and
    wholesale customers.
    
    2. During the Class Period, defendants repeatedly assured investors that the delinquency
    rate on the loans Oakwood made to home buyers was declining; that the Company had
    implemented a new credit scoring system to more efficiently evaluate credit customers
    and reduce credit losses; and that the Company had "tightened underwriting standards"
    and focused "additional emphasis" on sales and loans to "higher credit quality
    customers." Further, throughout the Class Period, defendants consistently reported
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • PLAINTIFFS' CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
  • FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
  • This is a securities class action on behalf of all purchasers of the common stock of Oakwood
  • Oakwood produces, sells and finances manufactured housing, serving retail and wholesale
  • During the Class Period, defendants repeatedly assured investors that the delinquency rate on
  • defendants were engaged in a variety of practices which fraudulently inflated Oakwood's
  • As a result of defendants' misrepresentations, the price of Oakwood common stock more than
  • Defendants began to reveal some of Oakwood's problems in April 1998, when Oakwood reported
  • Nevertheless, defendant St. George -- Oakwood's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer --
  • The Company attributed the write-down to increased delinquencies and substantial changes in
  • Venue is proper in this District under Section 27 of the Exchange Act and 28 U.S.C. § 1391.
  • OAKWOOD'S USE OF SECURITIES ANALYSTS AS A CONDUIT TO FEED FALSE INFORMATION TO THE SECURITIES
  • For the Company's 1997 fiscal year ended September 30, 1997, for example, the financial
  • Oakwood a fee to service the loans and, to the extent there is cash remaining in the trust
  • The value of the retained residual interests that result from these REMIC securitizations is
  • The Registrant uses a credit scoring system, updated in fiscal 1998, to enhance its credit
  • In addition to touting the Company's strict underwriting standards, defendants also
  • Sales contracts on manufactured housing were frequently backdated for inclusion in the prior
  • On April 22, 1997 -- the first day of the Class Period -- Oakwood issued a press release over
  • Based on current estimates, management believes that the fair value of the Company's retained
  •    |