 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MISLEADING PLAINTIFF SECURITIES MATERIALLY FALSE COMMON STOCK FACTS SECURITIES ACT TECHNOLOGY COMPLAINT IPO EXCHANGE ACT PRICES SALES PROSPECTUS REPORT INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS MEMORY CHIPS PURCHASERS VISUAL TECHNOLOGY OEM ALLEGATIONS CONNECTION UNDERWRITER DEFENDANTS PRODUCT OFFERINGS MASSACHUSETTS DISSEMINATION RELEVANT TIMES REGISTRATION STATEMENT MANAGEMENT |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
___________________________________)
RBI, AN ALASKAN LIMITED )
PARTNERSHIP, on behalf of itself )
and all others similarly situated, ) CASE NO. 96-11207MLW
)
Plaintiff, ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
) FOR VIOLATIONS OF
v. ) FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
)
ANDREW NAJDA; STANLEY W. BIALEK; )
NUMBER NINE VISUAL TECHNOLOGY )
CORPORATION; COWEN & CO.; )
UNTERBERG HARRIS; AND ROBERTSON, )
STEPHENS CO., ))
Defendants. )
___________________________________)
Plaintiff makes the following allegations upon
information and belief, except as to allegations specifically
pertaining to plaintiff and its counsel, based on the facts
alleged below, predicated upon the investigation undertaken by
plaintiff's counsel, and plaintiff believes that further
substantial evidentiary support will exist for the allegations
set forth below after a reasonable opportunity for discovery.
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is a class action on behalf of all purchasers
of the common stock of Number Nine Visual Technology Corporation
("Number Nine" or the "Company") between May 26, 1995 and January
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
DOCKET
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CONSOLIDATE RBI NAJDA STEPHENS MOTION CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION PLAINTIFFS KTB MLB CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT C/S DISMISS CONSOLIDATED DEFENDANT CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM COURT ROBERTSON MOTION HEARING UNTERBERG HARRIS ANDREW NAJDA EOD EXCHANGE ACT MEMORANDUM STIPULATION JOINT MOTION THALHEIMER LEAD PLAINTIFFS GILL COGAN CLASS CERTIFICATION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT |
Case docket was last updated on: 11/08/00.
Docket as of November 8, 2000 9:38 pm Page 1
Proceedings include all events.
1:96cv11207 RBI v. Najda, et al
LEAD
11207
LEAD 11207
U.S. District Court
U.S. District Court - Massachusetts (Boston)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 96-CV-11207
RBI v. Najda, et al Filed:
06/11/96
Assigned to: Chief Judge William G. Young Jury demand: Both
Demand: $0,000 Nature of Suit: 160
Lead Docket: None Jurisdiction: Federal
Question
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
RBI, An Alaskan Limited Jeffrey B. Rudman
Partnership, on behalf of [COR LD NTC]
itself and all others James W. Prendergast
similarly situated [COR LD NTC]
Plaintiff Hale & Dorr
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
617-526-6167
Thomas G. Shapiro
[COR LD NTC]
Shapiro, Grace & Haber
75 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
617-439-3939
Steven Schulman
[COR LD NTC]
Deborah Clark-Weintraub
[COR LD NTC]
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
