![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PARTY DISTRICT COURT INSPECTION STATES DISTRICT CIVIL CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITIES LITIGATION COPYING OBJECTION SUITE PREMISES ATTORNEY TESTIFY DEPOSITION PERMIT INSPECTION OFFICER PROTECTION PRODUCTION MATERIALS AVENUE NORTHERN DISTRICT LATHAM WATKINS LOS ANGELES FEDERAL RULES CIVIL PROCEDURE |
i
A 0 88 (Rev. 11/94) Subpoena in a Civil Case
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT
Northern
In re NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
SECURITIES LITIGATION
IN A CIVIL CASE
V.
R:' c 97-20471 EAI
TO: National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD, Inc.)
c/o Terri Reicher, Assistant General Counsel
YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear in the United States District Court at the
to
testify in the above case.
PLACE OF TESTIMONY
COURTROOM
DATE AND TIME
0
YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at the place, date, and time specified below
to testify at the taking of a deposition in
the above case.
PLACE OF DEPOSITION
DATE AND TIME
YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the
place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):
SEE ATTACHMENT
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE 9720471-EAI
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT AMENDED COMPLAINT REFORM DEFENDANTS MOTION DISMISS PLAINTIFES STIPULAM PRACTICE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION LITIGATION REFORM ACT COURT GRANTED DEFENDANTS DISMISS PLAIUTIFH FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT NENCLOD COMPLAINT PARTES HEREBY STIPULAM FIX DEFDANTS RESPONSE SECOND AMENDED CAMPLAINT LOULD CONDNUCD COUNTERPARTS SIGNATURE ILL BINDING ORRESPONDENCE MAILING WATKIN W97 |
1 LATHAM & WATKINS
Marc W. Rappel (Bar No. 97032)
2 James J. Farrell (Bar No. 166595)
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
3 Los Angeles, California 9007 1-2007
Telephone: (213) 485-1234
4 Facsimile: (2 13)
89 1-8763
5 Attorneys for Defendants
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 [n re NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS, Master File No. C-97 20471 EAI
11 [NC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CLASS ACTION
12
13 STIPULATION AND
14 This Document Relates To: All Actions
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~ T H A M
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
JUDICIAL NOTICE DISMISS PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT DEFENDANTS LATHAM WATKINS CALIFORNIA MOTION PRACTICE UNITED STATES SUPPORT SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FILINGS TRANSMISSION BUSINESS COLLECTING BAR JAMES FARRELL LOS ANGELES NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS DECLARATION SECURITIES SUPP CIR FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT EMPLOYERS PLEADINGS |
LATHAM & WATKINS
Marc W. Rappel (Bar No. 97032)
James J. Farrell (Bar No. 166595)
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2007
Telephone: (213) 485-1234
Facsimile: (213) 891-8763
Attorneys for Defendants
John Gorman and Pratap K. Kondamoori
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
In re NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS, | Master File No. C-97 20471 EAI
INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION |
| CLASS ACTION
|
| REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN
| SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO
| DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
| [filed Nov. 19, 1999]
| [Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6), 9(b)]
|
___________________________________ | Date: January 24, 2000
This Document Relates To: All Actions | Time: 10:00 a.m.
| Judge: Hon. Edward A. Infante
___________________________________ |
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendants John Gorman and Pratap K. Kondamoori (the
"Individual Defendants"), former officers of NUKO Information Systems, Inc.
("NUKO"), request that the Court take judicial notice of selected pages from the
following documents as attached to the Declaration of James J. Farrell in Support of the
Individual Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint:
1. NUKO's August 6, 1997 Form S-3 Registration Statement, filed with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC");
2. NUKO's May 14, 1997 10-Q Form 12B-25 Notification of Late Filing, filed
with the SEC on May 14, 1997.
3. NUKO's March 31, 1997 Form 10-K Annual Report.
4. NUKO's Form 10-Q SB Quarterly Report, filed with the SEC on August 14,
1996.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
5
.
MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS COURT NUKO REFORM ACT INFERENCE AMENDED COMPLAINT SECURITIES REVENUE SCIENTER STOCK FACTS ALLEGATIONS KONDAMOORI ALLEGE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CALIFORNIA INTERNEXT TRANSACTION STOCK PRICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS CLASS PERIOD ALLEGED INFLATED PRICE PRIVATE SECURITIES SECURITIES LITIGATION DELIBERATE RECKLESSNESS INSUFFICIENT PARTICULARITY SAC RESTATED REVENUE |
LATHAM & WATKINS
Marc W. Rappel (Bar No. 97032)
James J. Farrell (Bar No. 166595)
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2007
Telephone: (213) 485-1234
Facsimile: (213) 891-8763
Attorneys for Defendants
John Gorman and Pratap K. Kondamoori
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
In re NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS, | Master File No. C-97 20471 EAI
INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION |
| CLASS ACTION
|
| DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF MOTION AND
| MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
| COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS
| AND AUTHORITIES
| [filed Nov. 19, 1999]
| [Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6), 9(b)]
|
___________________________________ | Date: December __, 1999
This Document Relates To: All Actions | Time: 10:00 a.m.
| Judge: Hon. Edward A. Infante
___________________________________ |
TO PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on December __, 1999, at 10:00 a.m., or as soon
thereafter, counsel may be heard in the courtroom of the Honorable Edward A. Infante,
United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California, defendants,
John H. Gorman and Pratap K. Kondamoori (collectively the "Individual Defendants")
will and hereby do move the Court, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
("Reform Act"), to dismiss with prejudice plaintiffs' second amended complaint. This
motion is based on this notice of motion and motion, the supporting memorandum of
points and authorities filed herewith, all documents on file in this action and such other
written and oral argument as may be presented at or before the hearing of this motion.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
6
.
LITIGANTS
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DISTRICT NORTHERN DISTRICT CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE PLAINTIFF NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS PRATAP KONDAMOORI JOHN GORMAN |
5:97cv20612 Wolitarsky, et al v. Nuko Information, et al
RELATE
U.S. District Court
U.S. District for the Northern District of California (San Jose)
BRUCE WOLITARSKY, individually Herbert E. Milstein
and on behalf of all others [COR LD NTC]
similarly situated Cohen Milstein Hausfeld & Toll
Plaintiff 1100 New York Ave NW
West Tower Ste 500
Washington, DC 20005-3934
(202) 408-4600
Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr.
[COR LD NTC]
Berman DeValerio Pease &
Tabacco
425 California St
Ste 2025
San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 433-3200
Steven J. Toll
206-521-0080
Suite 2905
[COR LD NTC]
Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld &
Toll
1301 Fifth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
CAROL WOLITARSKY, individually Herbert E. Milstein
and on behalf of all others (See above)
similarly situated [COR LD NTC]
Plaintiff
Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr.
(See above)
[COR LD NTC]
Steven J. Toll
(See above)
[COR LD NTC]
SNIPPETS:
|
|
7
.
DECLARATION OF JAMES J FARRELL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT LATHAM WATKINS CALIFORNIA PRACTICE UNITED STATES DECLARE LOCATING RELEVANT PORTIONS JAMES FARRELL LOS ANGELES NUKO HERETO UNDERLINING TRANSMISSION DISMISS PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT BUSINESS COLLECTING ATTORNEYS DEFENDANTS NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS LAW PERSONNEL DOCUMENT RELATING REGISTRATION STATEMENT INTERNEXT REPORT REVENUE RECOGNITION POLICY |
LATHAM & WATKINS
Marc W. Rappel (Bar No. 97032)
James J. Farrell (Bar No. 166595)
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2007
Telephone: (213) 485-1234
Facsimile: (213) 891-8763
Attorneys for Defendants
John Gorman and Pratap K. Kondamoori
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
In re NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS, | Master File No. C-97 20471 EAI
INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION |
| CLASS ACTION
|
| DECLARATION OF JAMES J. FARRELL IN
| SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO
| DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
| [filed Nov. 19, 1999]
| [Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6), 9(b)]
|
___________________________________ | Date: January 24, 2000
This Document Relates To: All Actions | Time: 10:00 a.m.
| Judge: Hon. Edward A. Infante
___________________________________ |
DECLARATION OF JAMES J. FARRELL
I, James J. Farrell, declare as follows:
1. I am an attorney licensed to practice in the State of California and appear before this
Court, I am also an associate of the law firm of Latham & Watkins, attorneys for John
Gorman and Pratap K. Kondamoori, former officers of NUKO Information Systems, Inc.
("NUKO"). The matters stated herein are based on my personal knowledge. If called, I
could and would competently testify to the truth and accuracy of the matters stated
herein.
2. Attached hereto as Exhibit "1" is a true and correct copy of NUKO's August 6, 1997
Form S-3 Registration Statement, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission ("SEC"), that I printed from the SEC's electronic data gathering analysis and
retrieval system ("EDGAR"). Exhibit "1" includes handwritten interlineation and
underlining that I placed on the document to replace text deleted in printing the document
and to assist the Court in locating relevant portions of the document. Exhibit "1" is the
SNIPPETS:
|
|
8
.
DEFENDANTS REQUEST
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ANGELES DEFENDANTS ATTORNEYS WATKINS CALIFORNIA TRAVEL EVANSTON PRACTICE EMPLOYMENT KONDAMOORI EXTREMELY BUSY COUNTRY CONNECTION INSURANCE COVERAGE MATTER AUTHORITY INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS DEFENDANTS REQUEST LAW CORRESPONDENCE MAILING THEREON FULLY PREPAID ORDINARY COURSE BUSINESS COURT LOS ANGELES LATHAM W97 |
1 ,ATHAM & WATKINS
Marc W. Rappel (Bar No. 97032)
2 James J. Farrell (Bar No. 166595)
133 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
3 .os Angeles, California 90071 -2007
'elephone: (213) 485-1234
4 ;acsimile: (2 13) 891 -8763
5 ittorneys for Defendants
ohn Gorman and Pratap K. Kondamoori
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNA4
10 n re NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS, Master File No. C-97 20471 EA1
11 NC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CLASS ACTION
12
13 DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO BE
FROM PERSONAL ATTENDANCE AT
14 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
15
16 Date:
Time: 1:00
17 Settlement Judge:
18 rhis Document Relates To: All Actions
19 -_
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LATHAM & WATKIK DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO
SNIPPETS:
|
|
9
.
MEMO IN OPPOSITION TO DISMISS
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMPLAINT DEFENDANTS NUKO STANDARD PLAINTIFFS FACTS REFORM ACT ALLEGES PLEADING SCIENTER SECOND CIRCUIT MISLEADING PLEADS FACTS STOCK SUPP ALLEGATIONS CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE REVENUE RECOGNITION TRANSACTION STOCK PRICE ADEQUATELY ALLEGES INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS ACCOUNTING KONDAMOORI MOTIVE-AND-OPPORTUNITY TEST PLEADS FACTS CONSTITUTING LEXIS CORPORATE TRANSACTION RECKLESSNESS |
Robert S. Green (State Bar No. 136183)
Anthony K. Lee (State Bar No. 156018)
GIRARD & GREEN, LLP
160 Sansome Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 981-4800
Facsimile: (415) 981-4846
Jonathan M. Plasse
Robert Giallombardo
GOODKIND LABATON RUDOFF
& SUCHAROW LLP
100 Park Avenue, 12th Floor
New York, New York 10017-5563
Telephone: (212) 907-0700
Facsimile: (212) 818-0477
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
In re NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. ) Master File No. C-97-20471-EAI
SECURITIES LITIGATION )
) PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF
) POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN
) OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'
) MOTION TO DISMISS
) [filed Apr. 26, 1999]
) CLASS ACTION
)
) Date: May 17, 1999
) Time: 10:00 a.m.
_______________________________________ ) Judge: Honorable Edward A. Infante
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
II. THE REFORM ACT ADOPTED THE SECOND CIRCUIT STANDARD FOR
PLEADING SCIENTER.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
10
.
DECLARATION OF ANTHONY LEE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
LLP CALIFORNIA GIRARD NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS ROBERT ANTHONY LEE SAN FRANCISCO YORK ATTORNEYS PLAINTIFFS DECLARE EXHIBIT LITIGATION HERETO PREFERRED STOCK WARRANT PURCHASE AGREEMENT REPORT UNITED STATES SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION ELECTRONIC DATA GATHERING RETRIEVAL SYSTEM EDGAR INTERNET PENALTY PERJURY FOREGOING EPOST |
Robert S. Green (State Bar No. 136183)
Anthony K. Lee (State Bar No. 156018)
GIRARD & GREEN, LLP
160 Sansome Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 981-4800
Facsimile: (415) 981-4846
Jonathan M. Plasse
Robert Giallombardo
GOODKIND LABATON RUDOFF
& SUCHAROW LLP
100 Park Avenue, 12th Floor
New York, New York 10017-5563
Telephone: (212) 907-0700
Facsimile: (212) 818-0477
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
In re NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. ) Master File No. C-97-20471-EAI
SECURITIES LITIGATION )
) DECLARATION OF ANTHONY K.
) LEE IN OPPOSITION TO
) DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO
) DISMISS
) [filed Apr. 26, 1999]
) CLASS ACTION
)
) Date: May 17, 1999
) Time: 10:00 a.m.
_______________________________________ ) Judge: Honorable Edward A. Infante
I, Anthony K. Lee, declare as follows:
1. I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of California and an associate
at Girard & Green, LLP, attorneys for Plaintiffs in this litigation.
2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Exhibit 4.1, entitled
"SERIES B PREFERRED STOCK AND WARRANT PURCHASE
AGREEMENT," to NUKO Information Systems, Inc.'s report on Form S-3 filed
SNIPPETS:
|
|
11
.
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE 97-CV-20471
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COUNSEL PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANT INFANTE FIRST AMENDE AMENDED COMPLAINT JUDGE EDWARD MAG LEAD PLAINTIFFS CO-LEAD COUNSEL CGB STIPULATION APPOINTMENT RESPONSE CONFERENCE EXTENDING TIME MOTION LILLIAN LEVINE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE NUKO INFORMATION DEFENDANT JOHN GORMAN DOCKET DISTRICT CONSOLIDATION ORDER COURT JURY DEMAND OPPOSITION MEMORANDUM |
Docket as of April 14, 1999 [retrieved 4/15/99]
Proceedings include all events.
5:97cv20471 Levine v. Nuko Information, et al
U.S. District Court
U.S. District for the Northern District of California (San Jose)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 97-CV-20471
Levine v. Nuko Information, et al Filed:
05/23/97
Assigned to: Mag. Judge Edward A. Infante Jury demand: Both
Demand: $0,000 Nature of Suit: 850
Lead Docket: None Jurisdiction: Federal
Question
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
[Party and Counsel List]
5/23/97 1 COMPLAINT no Summons(es) issued; Fee status pd entered
on
5/23/97 in the amount of $ 150.00 ( Receipt No.
127545);
jury demand [5:97-cv-20471] (mp) [Entry date
05/29/97]
5/23/97 2 ORDER RE COURT PROCEDURE and SCHEDULE by Mag. Judge
Edward
A. Infante : Proof of service to be filed by 7/7/97 ;
counsels' case management statement to be filed by
9/12/97 ;
initial case management conference will be held 1:30
9/22/97 . (cc: all counsel) (mp) [Entry date 05/29/97]
6/5/97 3 RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Nuko
Information,
defendant John H. Gorman on 6/2/97 [5:97-cv-20471]
(gm)
[Entry date 06/16/97]
6/25/97 4 STIPULATION and ORDER by Mag. Judge Edward A. Infante
:
SNIPPETS:
|
|
12
.
MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS REFORM ACT NUKO COURT INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS SECURITIES NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS STOCK FACTS REVENUE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT LATHAM WATKINS CALIFORNIA KONDAMOORI STOCK PRICE COMPLAINT FAIL TRANSFER BINDER CCH PLEADING STANDARD ALLEGATION UNITED STATES FEDERAL RULES LOS ANGELES JOHN GORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT CIVIL PROCEDURE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION SECURITIES LITIGATION |
LATHAM & WATKINS
Marc W. Rappel (Bar No. 97032)
James J. Farrell (Bar No. 166595)
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2007
Telephone: (213) 485-1234
Facsimile: (213) 891-8763
Attorneys for Defendants
John Gorman and Pratap K. Kondamoori
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
In re NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS, | Master File No. C-97 20471 EAI
INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION |
| CLASS ACTION
|
| DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF MOTION AND
| MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED
| COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS
| AND AUTHORITIES
| [filed Mar. 16, 1999]
| [Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6), 9(b)]
____________________________________ | Date: April 26, 1999
This Document Relates To: All Actions | Time: 10:00 a.m.
| Judge: Hon. Edward A. Infante
____________________________________ |
TO PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on April 26, 1999, at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter,
counsel may be heard in the courtroom of the Honorable Edward A. Infante, United
States District Court, 280 South First Street, Suite 2112, San Jose, California, defendants,
John H. Gorman and Pratap K. Kondamoori (collectively the "Individual Defendants")
will and hereby do move the Court, pursuant Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b) of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("Reform
Act"), to dismiss with prejudice plaintiffs' first amended complaint. This motion is based
on this notice of motion and motion, the supporting memorandum of points and
authorities filed herewith, all documents on file in this action and such other written and
oral argument as may be presented at or before the hearing of this motion.
Respectfully
submitted,
SNIPPETS:
|
|
13
.
DEFENDANTS SUPP BRIEF
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS LEAD PLAINTIFF COURT STANDING MARC RAPPEL OPPOSE APPOINTMENT COUNSEL MOVANTS LATHAM WATKINS BAR JAMES FARRELL ATTORNEYS MEMORANDUM AUTHORITIES MOTION APPROVE HOWARD GUNTY PROFIT GUNTY PROFIT SHARING PARTY COMPLIANCE ACT UNRELATED PLAINTIFFS LAW FIRMS CO-LEAD COUNSEL CO-LIAISON COUNSEL |
LATHAM & WATKINS
Marc W. Rappel (Bar No. 97032)
James J. Farrell (Bar No. 166595)
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2007
Telephone: (213) 485-1234
Facsimile: (213) 891-8763
Attorneys for Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LILLIAN LEVINE, individually and on :
behalf of all others similarly situated, : CASE NO. C-97 20471 EAI
:
Plaintiff, :
:
60; v. :
:
NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS INC., : DEFENDANTS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF
and JOHN H. GORMAN, : REGARDING STANDING TO OPPOSE THE
: APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF
Defendants. : AND LEAD COUNSEL
:
:
: Date: September 15, 1997
: Time: 10:00 a.m.
: Place: Courtroom of the Hon. Edward A. Infante
: :
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
I.
DEFENDANTS HAVE STANDING TO OPPOSE THE IMPROPER LEAD
PLAINTIFF AND COUNSEL PROPOSED IN THIS CASE
Plaintiffs' reply memorandum asserts that defendants have no standing to oppose their
motion to appoint lead plaintiff and approve of class counsel. This Court addressed this
precise issue in Howard Gunty Profit Sharing v. Quantum Corporation, Civil No. 96-
20711 SW at p. 7 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 1997) (copy attached as Exhibit A). The Court ruled
that defendants have standing to oppose a motion for lead plaintiff. As Judge Williams
explained:
[W]hen, as in this suit, there are no other potential lead plaintiffs to
challenge a moving party, the Court must rely on the defendants to insure
SNIPPETS:
|
|
14
.
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MOVANTS WOLITARSKY MOTION PLAINTIFF LILLIAN LEVINE CO-LEAD COMPLAINTS PETER KANEVSKY APPOINTMENT DEFENDANTS GIRARD GOODKIND LABATON COHEN MILSTEIN CLASS MEMBERS SUCHAROW LLP BRUCE WOLITARSKY CAROL WOLITARSKY CO-LEAD COUNSEL MUSTAFA BENGALI MATTHEW SUTPHIN PETER MUSTO PSLRA NUKO STOCK PROPOSED LEAD PLAINTIFFS EXCHANGE ACT CLASS PERIOD ADEQUATE PLAINTIFF GOODKIND LABATON RUDOFF COHEN MILSTEIN HAUSFELD MEMORANDUM |
GIRARD & GREEN, LLP
Robert S. Green (SBN 136183)
160 Sansome Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 981-4800
GOODKIND LABATON RUDOFF
& SUCHAROW LLP
Jonathan M. Plasse
James M. Strauss
Catherine A. Murphy
100 Park Avenue, 12th Floor
New York, New York 10017-5563
Telephone: (212) 907-0700
Attorneys for Plaintiff Lillian Levine and
Movants Mustafa Bengali, Matthew Sutphin,
Peter Kanevsky and Peter Musto
COHEN MILSTEIN HAUSFELD
& TOLL, P.L.L.C
Herbert E. Milstein
Daniel S. Sommers
1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
West Tower, Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20005-3964
Telephone: (202) 408-4600
Attorneys for Movants Bruce Wolitarsky
and Carol Wolitarsky
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LILLIAN LEVINE, individually and on ) Case No. C-97 20471 EAI
behalf of all others similarly situated, )
)
Plaintiff, ) Date: August 25, 1997
) Time: 10:00 a.m.
- v. - ) Before: The Honorable
) Edward A. Infante
NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. )
and JOHN H. GORMAN, )
)
Defendants. )
_________________________________________ )
PLAINTIFF'S AND MOVANTS' NOTICE OF MOTION, MOTION AND
SNIPPETS:
|
|
15
.
DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO MOTION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
LEAD PLAINTIFF COUNSEL INVESTORS MOVANTS REFORM ACT SECURITIES COURT LITIGATION CLASS REPRESENTATIVES ATTORNEYS CONTROL APPOINTMENT LAW FIRMS CERTIFICATION SERVE NUKO STAKES CLASS MEMBERS LAWYERS CONFLICT CALIFORNIA MICRO DEVICES REQUEST DEFENDANTS DEFEAT PURPOSE COLLECTIVE LEAD PLAINTIFF CO-LEAD COUNSEL NUKO STOCK CO-LIAISON COUNSEL |
LATHAM & WATKINS
Marc W. Rappel (Bar No. 97032)
James J. Farrell (Bar No. 166595)
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2007
Telephone: (213) 485-1234
Facsimile: (213) 891-8763
Attorneys for Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LILLIAN LEVINE, individually and on | CASE NO. C-97 20471 EAI
behalf of all others similarly situated, |
| DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR
Plaintiff, | APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD
| COUNSEL
v. |
|
NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS INC., |
and JOHN H. GORMAN, |
| Date: August 25, 1997
Defendants. | Time: 10:00 a.m.
| Place: Courtroom of the Hon. Edward A. Infante
___________________________________ |
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
I.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant NUKO Information Systems, Inc. ("NUKO") is a high tech start up company
which designs and distributes advanced devices that enhance the transmission and
reception of video signals. NUKO revised its first quarter 1997 earnings and revenue
figures on May 21, 1997. As is typical in these cases, plaintiffs rely on the benefit of
hindsight to make out a securities claim on these facts, contending that NUKO's earlier
earnings and revenue figures must have been deliberately overstated to mislead investors.
In their pending motion, plaintiffs and movants request that the Court appoint all seven of
them -- and all four of their law firms -- as lead plaintiff and class counsel, respectively.
Combining all of the plaintiffs and movants as lead plaintiff will expand the power of
plaintiffs' counsel to control the prosecution of this case, and defeat one of the aims of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-67 (1995) (the
SNIPPETS:
|
|
16
.
DECLARATION OF ROBERT S GREEN IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PETER CAROL WOLITARSKY MEMBER LEAD PLAINTIFF SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT PURPORTED CLASS COURT NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOHN LLP YORK MOVANTS MUSTAFA BENGALI MATTHEW SUTPHIN PETER KANEVSKY PETER MUSTO LAWS GIRARD ROBERT ATTORNEYS PLAINTIFF LILLIAN LEVINE MILSTEIN BRUCE WOLITARSKY DECLARATION MOTION APPOINTMENT PSLRA DIRECTS |
GIRARD & GREEN, LLP
Robert S. Green (SBN 136183)
160 Sansome Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 981-4800
GOODKIND LABATON RUDOFF
& SUCHAROW LLP
Jonathan M. Plasse
James M. Strauss
Catherine A. Murphy
100 Park Avenue, 12th Floor
New York, New York 10017-5563
Telephone: (212) 907-0700
Attorneys for Plaintiff Lillian Levine and
Movants Mustafa Bengali, Matthew Sutphin,
Peter Kanevsky and Peter Musto
COHEN MILSTEIN HAUSFELD
& TOLL, P.L.L.C
Herbert E. Milstein
Daniel S. Sommers
1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
West Tower, Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20005-3964
Telephone: (202) 408-4600
Attorneys for Movants Bruce Wolitarsky
and Carol Wolitarsky
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LILLIAN LEVINE, individually and on ) Case No. C-97 20471 EAI
behalf of all others similarly situated, )
) DECLARATION OF ROBERT S.
Plaintiff, ) GREEN IN SUPPORT OF
) MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT
- v. - ) OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND
) FOR APPROVAL OF CHOICE
NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. ) OF CO-LEAD COUNSEL
and JOHN H. GORMAN, )
) Date: August 25, 1997
Defendants. ) Time: 10:00 a.m.
_________________________________________ ) Before: The Honorable
Edward A. Infante
SNIPPETS:
|
|
17
.
RELATED CASE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
LEVINE ACTION NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS JUDGE TABACCO MILSTEIN TOLL PLAINTIFFS FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS BERMAN DEVALERIO PEASE HAUSFELD DEFENDANTS SEEKING DAMAGES VIOLATIONS GORMAN BRUCE WOLITARSKY CAROL WOLITARSKY INFANTE UNDERLYING FACTS CIVIL DOCKET SHEET PRELIMINARY STAGE REFERENCE PREJUDICE PARTIES FOREGOING REASONS WOLITARSKY RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS MAGISTRATE JUDGE EDWARD PENDING |
Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr. (75484)
BERMAN, DeVALERIO, PEASE & TABACCO
425 California Street, Suite 2025
San Francisco, CA 94104-2205
Telephone: (415) 433-3200
Herbert E. Milstein
Daniel S. Sommers
COHEN, MILSTEIN, HAUSFELD & TOLL, P.L.L.C.
1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
West Tower, Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20005-3964
Telephone: (202) 408-4600
Steven J. Toll
COHEN, MILSTEIN, HAUSFELD & TOLL, P.L.L.C.
1301 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2905
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone (206) 521-0080
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
BRUCE WOLITARSKY and )
CAROL WOLITARSKY, individually )
and on behalf of all others )
similarly situated, ) Civil Action No.
) [C-97-2355]
Plaintiffs, ) NOTICE OF RELATED CASE
v. )) [filed Jun. 24, 1997]
NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., )
PRATAP K. KONDAMOORI and )
JOHN H. GORMAN ))
Defendants. )
_____________________________________ ))
PLAINTIFFS HEREBY GIVES NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 3-12 that this action
which is being filed concurrently herewith (the "Wolitarsky" action) and an action
captioned Levin v. Nuko Information Systems, Inc. et al., Case Number C97 20471 (EAI)
(the "Levine" action), filed on May 28, 1997 in this Court, are related.
The Wolitarsky action and the Levine action are related because they appear to arise from
the same or substantially identical transactions, happenings or events and involve most of
the same defendants. They call for determination of the same or substantially identical
questions of law and fact. The Levine action was brought by Lillian Levine, on Behalf of
SNIPPETS:
|
|
18
.
COMPLAINT B
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS CLASS ACTION DEFENDANTS ACT ACCOUNTING COMMON STOCK CLASS PERIOD INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS REVENUE MISLEADING MEMBERS ATTORNEYS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISSEMINATION MATERIALLY FALSE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITIES MATERIAL FACTS KONDAMOORI ARTIFICIALLY INFLATE STOCK OPTIONS HAUSFELD CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT NEWS ARTICLES FINANCIAL CONDITION RECKLESS DISREGARD |
Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr. (75484)
BERMAN, DeVALERIO, PEASE & TABACCO
425 California Street, Suite 2025
San Francisco, CA 94104-2205
Telephone: (415) 433-3200
Herbert E. Milstein
Daniel S. Sommers
COHEN, MILSTEIN, HAUSFELD & TOLL, P.L.L.C.
1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
West Tower, Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20005-3964
Telephone: (202) 408-4600
Steven J. Toll
COHEN, MILSTEIN, HAUSFELD & TOLL, P.L.L.C.
1301 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2905
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone (206) 521-0080
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRUCE WOLITARSKY and )
CAROL WOLITARSKY, individually )
and on behalf of all others )
similarly situated, ) Civil Action No.
) [C-97-2355]
Plaintiffs, ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
v. )) [filed Jun. 24, 1997]
NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., ) Jury Trial Demanded
PRATAP K. KONDAMOORI and )
JOHN H. GORMAN ))
Defendants. )
_____________________________________ ))
Plaintiffs, by their attorneys, for their Class Action Complaint (the "Complaint"), allege
the following upon personal knowledge as to themselves and to their own acts, and upon
information and belief based upon the investigation of plaintiffs' attorneys as to all other
matters. The investigation includes the review and analysis of public statements,
publicly-filed documents of Nuko Information Systems, Inc. ("Nuko" or the "Company"),
SNIPPETS:
|
|
19
.
COMPLAINT A
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMON STOCK PLAINTIFF CLASS ACTION ACT SECURITIES DEFENDANTS ACCOUNTING CLASS PERIOD GORMAN INVESTORS REVENUE MISLEADING MEMBERS ATTORNEYS DISSEMINATION MATERIALLY FALSE NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT MATERIAL FACTS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER ARTIFICIALLY INFLATE SUCHAROW LLP THOROUGH REVIEW NEWS ARTICLES STOCK OPTIONS FINANCIAL CONDITION PUBLIC REPRESENTATIONS PRIVATE PLACEMENT RECKLESS DISREGARD |
GIRARD & GREEN, LLP
Robert S. Green, Esq. (CA Bar 136183)
160 Sansome Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 981-4800
GOODKIND LABATON RUDOFF
& SUCHAROW LLP
Jonathan M. Plasse
James M. Strauss
Catherine A. Murphy
100 Park Avenue, 12th Floor
New York, New York 10017-5563
Telephone: (212) 907-0700
Attorneys for Plaintiff
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LILLIAN LEVINE, individually and on ) Civil Action No. 97-CV-20471
behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Jury Trial Demanded
Plaintiff, ) COMPLAINT
- v. - ) ) [filed May 23, 1997]
NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. ) CLASS ACTION
and JOHN H. GORMAN, ) )
Defendants. )
____________________________________ ) )
1. Plaintiff, by her attorneys, for her Class Action Complaint (the "Complaint"), alleges
the following upon personal knowledge as to herself and to her own acts, and upon
information and belief based upon the investigation of plaintiff's attorneys as to all other
matters. The investigation includes the thorough review and analysis of public
statements, publicly-filed documents of Nuko Information Systems, Inc., ("Nuko" or the
"Company"), press releases, news articles and the review and analysis of accounting rules
and related literature.
SUMMARY OF ACTION
2. This is a securities class action on behalf of public investors who purchased the
common stock of Nuko during the period from April 24, 1997 through May 20, 1997 (the
SNIPPETS:
|
|
20
.
ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS DEFENDANTS DENY PARAGRAPH COMPLAINT PLAINTIFFS DOCUMENT SPEAKS NUKO CHARACTERIZATIONS INCOMPLETE DIFFER TRUTH LATHAM WATKIN DEFENDANTS ADMIT RESTATEMENT STOCK PLAINTIFFS ALLEGE DISCLOSURES SECURITIES EXCHANGE LOS ANGELES PUBLICATIONS FILINGS INTERNEXT CONTRACT COMPENSATION APPLICABLE FASB STATEMENT PURPORTS CALIFORNIA |
1 T
1 LATHAM & WATKINS
Marc W. Rappel (Bar No. 97032)
2 James J. Farrell (Bar No. 166595)
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
3 Los Angeles, California 90071 -2007
Telephone: (213) 485-1234
4 Facsimile: (2 13) 89 1-8763
5 Attorneys for Defendants
John Gorman and Pratap K. Kondamoori
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 In re NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS, Master File No. C-97 20471 EAI
11 INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CLASS ACTION
12
13 ANSWER OF
KONDAMOORI
14 SECOND
15 This Document Relates To: All Actions
16
17 Defendants Pratap K. Kondamoori and John
18 hereby answer Plaintiffs' Seconded Amended Complaint (the
19 1. Defendants lack knowledge or
20 the truth of the allegations in paragraph 1 , and therefore deny
21 SUMMARY OF ACTION
22 2. Defendants admit that Plaintiffs
23 Sections 1O(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
24 Defendants also admit that NUKO Information Systems, Inc. ("NUKO")
25 on April 24, 1997. The April 24 press release speaks for itself.
26 herein, Defendants deny the allegations in paragraph 2 of the
27 3. Defendants admit that, on May 21,
28
LATHAM & WATKIN, Answer
ATTORNEYS AT L A W John
LOS ANGELES
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |