LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

AGRIBIOTECH Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: A58735, CourtName: CLASS ACTION CASES, State: NV Nevada, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>A58735, Agribiotech, Sales, Acquisitions, Stock, Seeds, Securities, Cash, Revenue, Officer, Financials, Materially False, Defendant Thomas, Growth, Misleading, Annualized Net Sales, Management, Acquired Companies, Accounting, Intercompany Sales, Consolidation, Defendant Ingalls, Class Action, Distribution Network, Business Wire, Reasons Set, Financial Position, Individual Defendants , ContentID: 120246176

Case Documents
1   CONSOLIDATED AND AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114230
55 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 55 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CONSOLIDATED AND AMENDED COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
SALES
ACQUISITIONS
STOCK
SEEDS
BUSINESS
SECURITIES
CASH
REVENUE
OFFICER
FINANCIALS
MATERIALLY FALSE
DEFENDANT THOMAS
GROWTH
MISLEADING
ANNUALIZED NET SALES
PLAINTIFFS
MANAGEMENT
ACQUIRED COMPANIES
ACCOUNTING
INTERCOMPANY SALES
CONSOLIDATION
DEFENDANT INGALLS
CLASS ACTION
DISTRIBUTION NETWORK
BUSINESS WIRE
REASONS SET
FINANCIAL POSITION
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
file:///CI/My Documents/Clare/woIfh/abtx.htm                                                       

    -  -     Plaintiffs'  Co-Lead  Counsel


                                                    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                                                          DISTRICT OF NEVADA



             )

             In re AgriBioTech, Inc. ) Base File No. CV-S-99-144-PMP (LRL)

             SECURITIES LITIGATION )

                                                               )

             ) CLASS ACTION

             This Document Relates To: )

             ALL ACTIONS ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED





                                                 CONSOLIDATED  AMENDED  COMPLAINT


                                                    INTRODUCTION  AND OVERVIEW


                   1.  This is a securities class action brought on behalf of purchasers of the
                      AgriBioTech, Inc. ("AgriBioTech" or the "Company") between September 24,
                      16, 1999, inclusive (the Tlass Period"), alleging a scheme and course of
                      fraud and deceit on purchasers of AgriBioTech securities. The defendants are
                      top officers (collectively the "defendants"). AgriBioTech operates
                      seed development and breeding programs, seed processing plants and a sales
                      AgriBioTech had limited sales until January 1, 1995, when  it began its
                      implemented its business strategy of growth through acquisitions -- making 33
                      combination of stock and cash as currency. By  June 1998, only three and
                      inception, AgriBioTech had  advanced through acquisitions from-virtually
                      share in  the $1.1 billion forage and turf seed sector.
                   2.  In 1995, the turfseed development industry was highly fragmented,
                      privately held businesses. Defendants embarked  upon a plan to consolidate

SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES LITIGATION)
  • CLASS ACTION
  • AgriBioTech, Inc. between September 24, 1997, and February
  • 16, 1999, inclusive, alleging a scheme and course of business that operated as a
  • seed processing plants and a sales distribution network.
  • implemented its business strategy of growth through acquisitions -- making 33 acquisitions
  • Defendants embarked upon a plan to consolidate this fragmented industry
  • AgriBioTech stock, as well as cash, as currency for the acquisitions.
  • closing dates of the acquisitions so that revenue from the operations of acquired companies
  • AgriBioTech failed to disclose that by consistently applying the practice of recognizing
  • The defendants also misstated AgriBioTech 's purported annualized net sales by failing to
  • intercompany sales when discussing the size and growth of AgriBioTech.
  • were necessary to fairly present the Company's financial position and results.
  • These representations were false and misleading when made,
  • AgriBioTech's financial results and were presented in violation of Generally Accepted
  • Defendant Thomas stated in October 1998 that AgriBioTech might get as much as $70 per
  • had resigned their management and/or board positions.
  • Group consists of plaintiffs Marc Packer, Isaac Augenstein, Jay Glatzer, Howard A. Hammond,
  • Packer Group's Motion for Consolidation and Appointment of Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel.
  • defendant Thomas resigned as an officer of the Company.
  • provisions in the employment agreement of defendant Ingalls.
  • The Individual Defendants participated directly in the wrongs complained of herein.
  • As described below, among other wrongful conduct, defendants communicated materially false and
  • On September 24, 1997, AgriBioTech announced on the Business Wire its results for the fourth
  • Olsen Fennel1 Seeds, Inc.
  • misleading for the reasons set forth in 735.
  • financials.
  •    |