 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
DOCKET
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANT DOCKET LEWIS DISTRICT COURT PLAINTIFF RICHARD ORZECHOWSKI MAGISTRATE INSTRUCTIONS ATTORNEY JURY DEMAND FILING DEMAND FILING FEE AKS BLOCK PRO HAC PRO HAC VICE WBH ALICIA DUFF JEFFREY APRV CRD AET APPROVE SELECTION COUNSEL SUPPORT AFFIDAVIT MARTIN CHITWWOD PROPOSED ORDER EDIT |
Case docket was last updated on: 09/08/00.
Docket as of September 8, 2000 5:19 pm Page 1
Proceedings include all events.
1:00cv1702 Lewis v. Advanced Technical, et al
8 MOS
8 MOS
U.S. District Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 00-CV-1702
Lewis v. Advanced Technical, et al Filed: 07/07/00
Assigned to: Judge Willis B. Hunt, Jr. Jury demand: Plaintiff
Demand: $0,000 Nature of Suit: 850
Lead Docket: None Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 15:78 Securities Exchange Act
LOUIS DIAZ Fred Taylor Isquith, phv
movant 212-545-4690 Direct
[COR LD NTC]
Gregory M. Nespole, phv
[COR LD NTC]
Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman
& Herz
270 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10016
212-545-4600
Martin D. Chitwood
[COR LD NTC]
David Andrew Bain
[COR LD NTC]
M. Krissi Temple
[COR LD NTC]
Chitwood & Harley
1230 Peachtree Street, N.E.
2900 Promenade II
Atlanta, GA 30309
404-873-3900
-------------------------
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF SECURITIES LAWS
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MATERIALLY FALSE MISLEADING ATP DEFENDANTS ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES DISSEMINATION REPORTS COMMON STOCK REVENUES SECURITIES FINANCIAL CONDITION EXCHANGE ACT MATERIALS CLASS ACTION MERGER AGREEMENT NORMAL RECURRING ADJUSTMENTS CONFORMITY NET INCOME SUBSIDIARIES DEFENDANT CARTER DEFENDANT DOMINY AEROSPACE/DEFENSE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PUBLICATION FAIR PRESENTATION GROSS PROFIT INCREASED SHIPMENTS PROXY STATEMENT |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
x
JAMES CURKEN, On Behalf of Himself : Civil Action No.
and all Others Similarly Situated, : :
Plaintiff, : : COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION
vs. : OF FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
:
ADVANCED TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, :
INC., JAMES S. CARTER, JAMES P. :
HOBT, and GARRETT L. DOMINY, : DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
:
Defendants. : x
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is a securities fraud class action on behalf of all purchasers of the common stock of
Technical Products, Inc. ("ATP" or the " Company") between April 22, 1998, and April 28, 2000,
(the "Class Period"), seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Act"). This action involves the dissemination of materially false and misleading statements
among other things, the Company's deteriorated financial condition, and the failure of the
report its financial results in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2. The claims asserted herein arise under and pursuant to §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange
§§78j(b) and 78t(a)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the Securities and Exchange
("SEC") [17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5].
3. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
and §27 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §78aa].
4. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to§27 of the Exchange Act, and 28 U.S.C. §1391(b).
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
