LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: AMD109437, CourtName: CLASS ACTION CASES, State: CA California, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>AMD109437, Amd, Act, Securities, Class Action, Exchange Act, Common Stock, California, District, York, Price, Market, Allegations, Defendant Sanders, Material Facts, Microprocessors, Production Problems, States District Court, Advanced Micro Devices, Violation, Misleading, Los Angeles, Ira, Kirby Mcinerney, Squire, Llp, Purchasers, Docket, Entry, Management, Ellis Investment, Advanced Micro, Northern District, Civil Docket, Dkt, Securities Exchange Act, Party, Amount, Jury, Trial Demand, Mag , ContentID: 120246172

Case Documents
1 1999-04-27 DOCKET
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114223
2 pages
PDF
2 1999-03-10 COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF SECURITIES LAWS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114222
22 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 2 documents , 24 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . DOCKET

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DOCKET
DISTRICT
ENTRY
COURT
MANAGEMENT
ELLIS INVESTMENT
ADVANCED MICRO
NORTHERN DISTRICT
CALIFORNIA
CIVIL DOCKET
DKT
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
PARTY
AMOUNT
JURY
TRIAL DEMAND
MAG
JUDGE BERNARD ZIMMERMAN
MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
 Docket as of April 27, 1999 [retrieved 4/28/99]
Proceedings include all events.                                          M-ADR
RELATE
3:99cv1102 Ellis Investment Co. v. Advanced Micro, et al

                                                                 M-ADR RELATE
                           U.S. District Court
     U.S. District for the Northern District of California (S.F.)

                  CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 99-CV-1102

Ellis Investment Co. v. Advanced Micro, et al                    Filed: 03/10/99
Assigned to: Mag. Judge Bernard Zimmerman         Jury demand: Plaintiff
Demand: $0,000                                    Nature of Suit: 850
Lead Docket: 99-CV-1102                           Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Dkt# in other court: None

Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

[Party & Counsel List]


3/10/99 1           COMPLAINT (Summons Issued); Fee status paid entered on
                    3/10/99 in the amount of $150.00 (Receipt No. 51373); jury
                    trial demand     [3:99-cv-01102] (tn)

3/10/99 2           ORDER RE COURT PROCEDURE and SCHEDULE (ADR Multi-Option) by
                    Mag. Judge Bernard Zimmerman: Proof of service to be filed
                    by 4/26/99; counsels' case management statement to be filed
                    by 7/2/99; and initial case management conference will be
                    held at 4:00 p.m. on 7/12/99 (cc: all counsel)
                    [3:99-cv-01102] (tn) [3:99cv1102]

4/20/99 3           ORDER by Mag. Judge Bernard Zimmerman relating case to
                    C-99-1851-BZ, C-99-1131-FMS, C-99-1133-BZ, C-99-1155-BZ,
                    C-99-1156-BZ, C-99-1320-BZ, C-99-1345-BZ, C-99-1383-BZ,
                    C-99-1402-BZ, C-99-1664-BZ (cc: all counsel)
                    [3:99-cv-01102] (tn) [Entry date 04/22/99] [3:99cv1102]

4/26/99 4           ORDER by Mag. Judge Bernard Zimmerman relating this case
                    to C-99-1959-BZ (cc: all counsel) [3:99-cv-01102] (tn)
                    [Entry date 04/27/99] [3:99cv1102]

4/26/99 5           ORDER by Mag. Judge Bernard Zimmerman relating this case
                    to C-99-1501-BZ, C-99-1851-BZ & C-99-1879-BZ (cc: all
                    counsel) [3:99-cv-01102] (tn) [Entry date 04/27/99]
                    [3:99cv1102]

[END OF DOCKET: 3:99cv1102]
SNIPPETS:
  • Docket as of April 27,
  • 3:99cv1102 Ellis Investment Co. v. Advanced Micro,
  • U.S. District Court
  • U.S. District for the Northern District of California
  • CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #:
  • Dkt# in other court: None
  • Cause: 15:78mSecurities Exchange Act
  • [Party & Counsel List]
  • 3/10/99 in the amount of $150.00; jury
  • trial demand
  • Mag.
  • Judge Bernard Zimmerman: Proof of service to be filed
  • counsels' case management statement to be filed
  • and initial case management conference will be
  • [Entry date 04/22/99]

  • 2 . COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF SECURITIES LAWS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    AMD
    PLAINTIFF
    ACT
    SECURITIES
    CLASS ACTION
    EXCHANGE ACT
    COMMON STOCK
    LAW
    CALIFORNIA
    YORK
    PRICE
    MARKET
    DISTRICT
    ALLEGATIONS
    DEFENDANT SANDERS
    MATERIAL FACTS
    MICROPROCESSORS
    PRODUCTION PROBLEMS
    ATTORNEYS
    STATES DISTRICT COURT
    ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
    VIOLATION
    MISLEADING
    LOS ANGELES
    IRA
    KIRBY MCINERNEY
    SQUIRE
    LLP
    PURCHASERS
    
     LIONEL Z. GLANCY #134180
    TRACY L. THROWER #145782
    MICHAEL GOLDBERG #188669
    LAW OFFICES OF LIONEL Z. GLANCY
    1801 Avenue of the Stars
    Suite 308
    Los Angeles, California 90067
    (310) 201-9150
    
    IRA M. PRESS
    KIRBY McINERNEY & SQUIRE, LLP
    830 Third Avenue
    10th Floor
    New York, New York 10022
    (212) 317-2300
    
    Attorneys for Plaintiff
    
    
                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    
                            NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
    
    ___________________________________
    ELLIS INVESTMENT CO., LTD.,               | Civil Action. No.
    personally, and on behalf of all          | 99-CV-1102 BZED
    others similarly situated,                | [filed Mar. 10, 1999]
                                              |
         Plaintiff,                           | Hon. Bernard Zimmerman
                                              |
         v.                                   | CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                                              | FOR VIOLATION OF FEDERAL
    ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. and          | SECURITIES LAWS
    JERRY SANDERS,                            ||
         Defendants.                          | JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
    ___________________________________|
    
                  Plaintiff, through counsel, alleges as follows, based
    
    on information and belief, except those allegations which
    
    pertain to the named plaintiff, which are based on personal
    
    knowledge.          Plaintiff's information and belief is based, inter
    
    alia, on the investigation made by and through counsel,
    
    primarily from public filings, statements, and releases made by
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Los Angeles, California 90067
  • IRA M.
  • KIRBY McINERNEY & SQUIRE, LLP
  • 10th Floor New York, New York 10022
  • Attorneys for Plaintiff
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
  • Plaintiff, through counsel, alleges as follows, based
  • purchasers of securities issued by Advanced Micro Devices,
  • under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  • AMD cut prices on its
  • underway) as well as a significant increase in AMD's market
  • defendants knew or in the absence of recklessness
  • production problems with its K-6 microprocessor.
  • earnings, and AMD's stock price rose quickly, from just $17 per
  • decreased the number of high powered microprocessors that the
  • Section 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  • false and misleading information, occurred in this District.
  • Company had nearly 145 million shares of common stock
  • Defendant Sanders is AMD's Chief Executive
  • PLAINTIFF'S CLASS ALLEGATIONS
  • Plaintiff brings this action as a class action
  • Common questions of law and fact exist as to all
  • reports contained untrue statements of material facts and omitted
  • made, not misleading, in violation of Section 10of the 1934
  •    |