 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
STIPULATION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANT AUTOMATIC DATA STIPULATION JUDGEMENT PLAINTIFF FAILURE CLAYTON ACT PARTIES CONSENT PARTY WITHDRAWN COURT MOTION ENTRY PROVISION ACQUISITION AUTOINFO ASSETS FAILING PREMERGER NOTIFICATION REPORT DISCHARGES OFFICER JAMES BENSON GENERAL COUNSEL/CORPORATE VICE COUNSEL/CORPORATE VICE PRESIDENT ADP BOULEVARD ROSELAND JERSEY |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____________________________________)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
c/o Department of Justice )
Washington, D.C. 20530, )
Plaintiff, ))
v. ) Civil Action No. 96
) Entered: April 10, 1996
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING, INC.) Filed: April 10, 1996
One ADP Boulevard )
Roseland, New Jersey 07068-1728, ) NANCY MAYER-WHITTINGTON, CLERK
Defendant. ) U.S. DISTRICT COURT
____________________________________)
STIPULATION
It is stipulated by and between the undersigned parties, by their respective attorneys,
(1) the parties consent that the Court may file and enter a Final Judgment in the form
attached to this Stipulation, on the Court's own motion or on the motion of any party at any time,
and without further notice to any party or other proceedings, if Plaintiff has not withdrawn its
consent, which it may do at any time before the entry of judgment by serving notice of its
withdrawal on Defendant Automatic Data Processing, Inc. and filing that notice with the Court;
(2) the Defendant Automatic Data Processing, Inc. waives any objection to venue for
purposes of this Final Judgment;
(3) in the event Plaintiff withdraws its consent or if the proposed Final Judgment is not
entered pursuant to this Stipulation, this Stipulation shall be of not effect whatever and the
making of this Stipulation shall be without prejudice to any party in this or any other proceeding;
and
(4) the parties' execution of this Stipulation and the entry of the Final Judgment settles,
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING UNITED STATES DEFENDANT AUTOMATIC DATA PLAINTIFF CLAYTON ACT JUDGEMENT AMERICA ENTRY PAYMENT TREASURY COMPLAINT ANTITRUST CONSENT ADJUDICATION LAW PARTY HEREBY PAY CIVIL PENALTY AMOUNT WASHINGTON UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT JUSTICE LIBERTY SUITE ANNUM ACCRUE THEREON BEAR COSTS |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____________________________________)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
c/o Department of Justice )
Washington, D.C. 20530, )
Plaintiff, ))
v. ) Civil Action No. 96 0606
) Entered: April 10, 1996
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING, INC. ) Filed: April 10, 1996
One ADP Boulevard )
Roseland, New Jersey 07068-1728, ) NANCY MAYER-WHITTINGTON, CLERK
Defendant. ) U.S. DISTRICT COURT
____________________________________)
FINAL JUDGMENT
Plaintiff, the United States of America, having commenced this action by filing its
Complaint herein for violations of section 7A of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18a, commonly
known as the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, and Plaintiff and
Defendant Automatic Data Processing, Inc., by their respective attorneys, having consented to
the entry of this Final Judgement without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law herein
and without the Final Judgment constituting any evidence against or an admission by any party
with respect to any such issue:
NOW, THEREFORE, before the taking of any testimony and without trial or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law herein, and upon the consent of the parties hereto, it is
hereby
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:
I.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
