 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
FAMILY PRACTICE PRACTICE RESIDENCY UNITED STATES DIRECTORS GUIDELINES MEDICAL STUDENTS DEFENDANT COMPLAINT COMPETITION RECRUITING VIOLATION EMPLOYMENT ACT AFPRD MEMBER ALLEGES DISTRICT INDUCEMENTS CONTRACT CONSPIRACY RELIEF SHERMAN ACT RESTRAIN REQUEST NATIONWIDE HOSPITAL RESIDENCY CONCERT PROMULGATION EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Western Division
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, Civil Action No:
v. 15 U.S.C. § 1
(Antitrust Violation Alleged)
ASSOCIATION OF FAMILY PRACTICE
RESIDENCY DIRECTORS, 15 U.S.C. § 4
(Equitable Relief Sought)
Defendant.
COMPLAINT
The United States of America, by its attorneys and acting
under the direction of the Attorney General of the United States,
brings this civil antitrust action to obtain equitable relief
against the named defendant and complains and alleges as follows:
I.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. The United States files this Complaint under Section 4
of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 4, as amended, to prevent and
restrain defendant's continuing violation of Section 1 of the
Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1.
2. The defendant maintains offices, transacts business,
and is found within the Western District of Missouri, within the
meaning of Section 12 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 22.
II.
DEFENDANT
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
COMPETITIVE IMPACT STATEMENT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
RESIDENCY FAMILY PRACTICE AFPRD DEFENDANT COMPETITION DIRECTORS VIOLATION GUIDELINES ENTRY COMPLAINT MEMBER COURT ACT PROVISIONS CONTRACT UNITED STATES STUDENTS ATTRACT COMPETITIVE IMPACT STATEMENT ANTITRUST EMPLOYMENT ENJOINS ALLEGES RESTRAINED COMPETITION PLAINTIFF COMPLIANCE INDUCEMENTS RECRUITING PROHIBITING |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Western Division
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, Civil Action No:
v. 96-0575-CV-W-2
ASSOCIATION OF FAMILY PRACTICE
RESIDENCY DIRECTORS,
Defendant.
COMPETITIVE IMPACT STATEMENT
Pursuant to Section 2(b) of the Antitrust Procedures
and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. § 16(b) ("APPA"), the United States
files this Competitive Impact Statement relating to the proposed
Final Judgment submitted for entry in this civil antitrust
proceeding.
I.
NATURE AND PURPOSE OF THE PROCEEDING
On _________, the United States filed a civil antitrust
complaint alleging that defendant, the Association of Family
Practice Residency Directors ("AFPRD"), and others entered into an
agreement that restrained competition among family practice
residency programs to employ family practice residents, and
constituted a per se violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15
U.S.C. § 1. The Complaint seeks injunctive relief to enjoin
continuance or recurrence of this violation.
The United States filed with the Complaint a proposed Final
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
FINAL JUDGMENT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
RESIDENCY FAMILY PRACTICE DEFENDANT AFPRD DIRECTORS ENTRY UNITED STATES PLAINTIFF CONTRACTING DISTRICT COURT EMPLOYEES PROVISIONS LAW INDUCEMENTS EXPENSES PROSPECTIVE FAMILY PRACTICE COMPETITIVE IMPACT STATEMENT POLICY GUIDELINES AFPRD MEMBER CERTIFICATIONS COMPLIANCE OFFERING PARAGRAPHS VIOLATIONS PARTIES SUBSIDY OFFICERS |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Western Division
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, Civil Action No:
v. 96-575-CV-W-2
ASSOCIATION OF FAMILY PRACTICE
RESIDENCY DIRECTORS,
Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
Plaintiff, the United States of America, having filed its Complaint on
May 28, 1996, and plaintiff and defendant, by their respective attorneys,
having consented to the entry of this Final Judgment without trial or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and without this Final Judgment
constituting any evidence against or an admission by any party regarding any
issue of fact or law;
NOW, THEREFORE, before the taking of any testimony, and without trial or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and upon consent of the parties, it
is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:
I.
JURISDICTION
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and each of the
parties to this action. The Complaint states claims upon which relief may be
granted against the defendant under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
