 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
COMPETITIVE IMPACT STATEMENT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
UNITED STATES DEALER ANCHORSHADE DEFENDANT OUTDOOR UMBRELLAS RESALE PRICE ENTRY ANTITRUST COURT ALLEGES ACT APPA COMPLAINT CONSPIRACY VIOLATION TERMINATE AGREEMENTS COMPLIANCE PROVISIONS COMPETITION SOLD LAWS SELL PUBLICATION SUGGESTED RESALE PRICE PRICING WITHDRAWS CONSENT ENFORCE |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - )
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Civil Action No.
) Filed:
June
20,
1996
Plaintiff, )
) 15
U.S.C.
1
v. ) 15 U.S.C. § 4
)
ANCHORSHADE,
INC.,
)
)
Defendant. )
)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - )
COMPETITIVE IMPACT STATEMENT
The United States of America, pursuant to Section 2 of the Antitrust Procedures and
Penalties Act (APPA), 15 U.S.C. § 16(b), submits this Competitive Impact Statement in
connection with the proposed Final Judgment submitted for entry in this civil antitrust
proceeding.
I
NATURE AND PURPOSE OF THE PROCEEDING
On June 20, 1996, the United States filed a civil antitrust complaint under Section 4 of
the Sherman Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 4, alleging that the defendant AnchorShade, Inc.
engaged in a combination and conspiracy, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15
U.S.C. § 1, to fix the price of outdoor umbrellas sold by AnchorShade, Inc. to dealers throughout
the United States. The complaint alleges that, in furtherance of this conspiracy, AnchorShade,
Inc.:
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
FINAL JUDGMENT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANT DEALER PRICE COMPLIANCE RESALE PRICE ANCHORSHADE OFFICER ENTRY OUTDOOR UMBRELLAS ANTITRUST DIRECTORS SUGGESTED RESALE PLAINTIFF COURT PRICING UNITED STATES PROVISIONS EMPLOYEES TERMINATE LAW REQUEST CONSENT PARTY SOLD PROTECTION SALE PURPOSE CIVIL VIOLATION |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - )
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Civil Action No.
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
ANCHORSHADE,
INC.,
)
)
Defendant. )
)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -)
FINAL
JUDGMENT
Plaintiff, United States of America, having filed its complaint herein on
and plaintiff and defendant, AnchorShade, Inc., having consented to the entry of this Final
Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law herein and without this Final
Judgment constituting any evidence against or an admission by any party with respect to any such
issue;
And whereas defendant has agreed to be bound by the provisions of this Final Judgment
pending its approval by the Court;
Now, THEREFORE, before the taking of any testimony and without trial or adjudication
of any issue of fact or law herein, and upon consent of the parties hereto, it is hereby ORDERED,
ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:
I
JURISDICTION
This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action and of the party consenting
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
FINAL JUDGMENT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANT DEALER PRICE COMPLIANCE RESALE PRICE ANCHORSHADE OFFICER ENTRY OUTDOOR UMBRELLAS ANTITRUST DIRECTORS SUGGESTED RESALE PLAINTIFF COURT PRICING UNITED STATES PROVISIONS EMPLOYEES TERMINATE LAW REQUEST CONSENT PARTY SOLD PROTECTION SALE PURPOSE CIVIL VIOLATION |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - )
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Civil Action No.
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
ANCHORSHADE,
INC.,
)
)
Defendant. )
)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -)
FINAL
JUDGMENT
Plaintiff, United States of America, having filed its complaint herein on
and plaintiff and defendant, AnchorShade, Inc., having consented to the entry of this Final
Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law herein and without this Final
Judgment constituting any evidence against or an admission by any party with respect to any such
issue;
And whereas defendant has agreed to be bound by the provisions of this Final Judgment
pending its approval by the Court;
Now, THEREFORE, before the taking of any testimony and without trial or adjudication
of any issue of fact or law herein, and upon consent of the parties hereto, it is hereby ORDERED,
ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:
I
JURISDICTION
This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action and of the party consenting
SNIPPETS:
|
|
4
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
OUTDOOR UMBRELLAS ANCHORSHADE CONSPIRACY UNITED STATES DEALERS ACT FLORIDA RESTRAIN COMMERCE COURT COMPLAINT SHERMAN VIOLATION RESALE PRICE INTERSTATE RELIEF AGREEMENT PLAINTIFF SOUTHERN DISTRICT CO-CONSPIRATORS TRADE COMPETITION PURPOSE ATTORNEYS ACTING JURISDICTION BUSINESS FURTHERANCE FLOW |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Civil Action No. 96-
08426 ) Filed: June 20, 1996
Plaintiff, )
) 15 U.S.C. § 1
v. ) 15 U.S.C.
§ 4 )
ANCHORSHADE, INC., ) )
Defendant. ) )
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -)
COMPLAINT
The United States of America, by its attorneys, acting under
the direction of the Attorney General of the United States,
brings this civil action against the above-named defendant and
complains and alleges as follows:
I
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This Complaint is filed and these proceedings are
instituted under Section 4 of the Sherman Act, as amended (15
U.S.C. § 4), in order to prevent and restrain violations by the
defendant, as hereinafter alleged, of Section 1 of the Sherman
Act (15 U.S.C. § 1). This Court has jurisdiction over this
matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and § 1337.
2. Defendant transacts business and is found in the
Southern District of Florida.
II
DEFINITIONS
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
