LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

US v AMR CORP AMERICAN AIRLINES INC and AMR EAGLE HOLDING CORPORATION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 33, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: US, State: KS Kansas, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>33, United States, American, Materials, Carriers, Disclosure, Law Enforcement, Requests, Confidentiality, Airlines, Pursuant, Motion, Connection, Hubs, Domestic Airline Industry, Cid, Nw/co, District Court, Air Carriers, Airline Industry, Dfw, Protective Order, Investigatory Files, Conrath Decl, Antitrust Civil, Competitors, Ongoing Investigation, Civil Investigative Demand , ContentID: 120245990

Case Documents
1   US OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS-2
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 113025
20 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 20 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . US OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS-2

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
AMERICAN
MATERIALS
CARRIERS
DISCLOSURE
LAW ENFORCEMENT
REQUESTS
COURT
CONFIDENTIALITY
AIRLINES
PLAINTIFF
PURSUANT
MOTION
CONNECTION
DEFENDANTS
HUBS
DOMESTIC AIRLINE INDUSTRY
CID
NW/CO
DISTRICT COURT
AIR CARRIERS
AIRLINE INDUSTRY
DFW
PROTECTIVE ORDER
INVESTIGATORY FILES
CONRATH DECL
ANTITRUST CIVIL
COMPETITORS
ONGOING INVESTIGATION
CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND
                        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS




                                              )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                     ))
                        Plaintiff,            ))             Civil Action No. 99-1180-JTM
                  v.                          ))
AMR CORPORATION,                              )
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC, and                   )
AMERICAN EAGLE HOLDING                        )
CORPORATION,                                  ))
                        Defendants.           ))

                  MEMORANDUM OF THE UNITED STATES IN SUPPORT
             OF ITS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL
                  DOCUMENTS RESPONSIVE TO AMERICAN'S FIRST AND
                           SECOND REQUESTS FOR DOCUMENTS


I.      INTRODUCTION

        We oppose American's motion because it would require us to violate the Antitrust Civil

Process Act, to violate an order entered by the United States District Court of the Eastern

Michigan, and also to divulge to American confidential materials that Plaintiff has obtained from

American's competitors in connection with its on-going law enforcement investigations involving

suspected anticompetitive conduct of other air carriers in hubs other than DFW -- the only hub at

in this case.



       American seeks disclosure of two general categories of documents.  First, American seeks

documents obtained by the United States pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand ("CID") in connection

with its investigations of other carriers in the domestic airline industry.  To support its claim

documents, American argues erroneously that the United States has failed to produce to American the

one category of documents that all parties agree should be produced to American:  all documents

obtained by the United States during its investigation into American's suspected predatory conduct
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • MEMORANDUM OF THE UNITED STATES IN SUPPORT
  • OF ITS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL
  • SECOND REQUESTS FOR DOCUMENTS
  • We oppose American's motion because it would require us to violate the Antitrust Civil
  • and also to divulge to American confidential materials that Plaintiff has obtained from
  • American's competitors in connection with its on-going law enforcement investigations
  • suspected anticompetitive conduct of other air carriers in hubs other than DFW -- the only
  • American seeks disclosure of two general categories of documents.
  • with its investigations of other carriers in the domestic airline industry.
  • United States from making information obtained pursuant to the Act (i.e.,
  • CID) available for examination by American except in limited circumstances.
  • American's predatory conduct at DFW, including materials that it obtained pursuant to
  • Ç The United States has properly asserted the law enforcement investigatory files
  • Airlines Corp. and Continental Airlines, Inc. action, pending in the United States District
  • Ç NW/CO is an action that was filed on October 23,
  • (Conrath Decl., Ex.
  • Ç The Protective Order entered by Judge Hood in NW/CO prohibits the United States
  • as have other domestic air carriers.
  • investigation are produced in response to a Civil Investigative Demand issued pursuant to the
  • three other CIDs issued to the subjects of the Division's ongoing investigation of possible
  • which guarantees a high degree of confidentiality to the material provided.
  •    |