![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
US OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS-2
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
AMERICAN MATERIALS CARRIERS DISCLOSURE LAW ENFORCEMENT REQUESTS COURT CONFIDENTIALITY AIRLINES PLAINTIFF PURSUANT MOTION CONNECTION DEFENDANTS HUBS DOMESTIC AIRLINE INDUSTRY CID NW/CO DISTRICT COURT AIR CARRIERS AIRLINE INDUSTRY DFW PROTECTIVE ORDER INVESTIGATORY FILES CONRATH DECL ANTITRUST CIVIL COMPETITORS ONGOING INVESTIGATION CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ))
Plaintiff, )) Civil Action No. 99-1180-JTM
v. ))
AMR CORPORATION, )
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC, and )
AMERICAN EAGLE HOLDING )
CORPORATION, ))
Defendants. ))
MEMORANDUM OF THE UNITED STATES IN SUPPORT
OF ITS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL
DOCUMENTS RESPONSIVE TO AMERICAN'S FIRST AND
SECOND REQUESTS FOR DOCUMENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
We oppose American's motion because it would require us to violate the Antitrust Civil
Process Act, to violate an order entered by the United States District Court of the Eastern
Michigan, and also to divulge to American confidential materials that Plaintiff has obtained from
American's competitors in connection with its on-going law enforcement investigations involving
suspected anticompetitive conduct of other air carriers in hubs other than DFW -- the only hub at
in this case.
American seeks disclosure of two general categories of documents. First, American seeks
documents obtained by the United States pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand ("CID") in connection
with its investigations of other carriers in the domestic airline industry. To support its claim
documents, American argues erroneously that the United States has failed to produce to American the
one category of documents that all parties agree should be produced to American: all documents
obtained by the United States during its investigation into American's suspected predatory conduct
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |