LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

US v AMR CORP AMERICAN AIRLINES INC and AMR EAGLE HOLDING CORPORATION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 68, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: US, State: KS Kansas, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>68, Carriers, Declaration, Cid, American, Support, Compel Documents, Hubs, Add-on Clearance, John, Nannes, Motion, Responsibility, Antitrust, Civil, Pursuant, Enforcement, Assistant, Opp, Requesting, Production, Emanating, Predatory, Economists, Dallas/ft, Worth, Low Cost Carriers, Ftc, Disclosure, Materials , ContentID: 120245989

Case Documents
1   US OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS JOHN NANNES
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 113022
6 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 6 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . US OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS JOHN NANNES

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DECLARATION
CID
ATTORNEYS
AMERICAN
SUPPORT
COMPEL DOCUMENTS
HUBS
ADD-ON CLEARANCE
JOHN
NANNES
MOTION
RESPONSIBILITY
ANTITRUST
CIVIL
PURSUANT
ENFORCEMENT
ASSISTANT
OPP
REQUESTING
PRODUCTION
EMANATING
PREDATORY
ECONOMISTS
DALLAS/FT
WORTH
LOW COST CARRIERS
FTC
DISCLOSURE
MATERIALS
                       IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS




                                              )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                     ))
                       Plaintiff,             ))             Civil Action No. 99-1180-JTM
               v.                             ))
AMR CORPORATION,                              )
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC, and                   )
AMERICAN EAGLE HOLDING                        )
CORPORATION,                                  ))
                       Defendants.            )
____________________________________)


                     DECLARATION OF JOHN M. NANNES IN SUPPORT
             OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION
             TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS RESPONSIVE TO AMERICAN'S
                     FIRST AND SECOND REQUESTS FOR DOCUMENTS



       I, John M. Nannes, hereby declare as follows:

       1.       I am a Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Antitrust Division ("Division") of

United States Department of Justice.  I have held that position since early 1998.  I make this

declaration in support of plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel production of

information contained in the Division's files relating to ongoing investigation of attempts by

carriers (other than American) to monopolize certain city pairs emanating from their hubs (other

Dallas/Ft. Worth) by predatory conduct directed against low cost carriers.



       2.      The statements made in this declaration are based upon my personal knowledge, upon

information made available to me in my official capacity, and upon conclusions and determinations

reached and made in accordance therewith.

       3.      As Deputy Assistant Attorney General, I have supervisory responsibility for directing

SNIPPETS:
  • DECLARATION OF JOHN M. NANNES IN SUPPORT
  • OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION
  • TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS RESPONSIVE TO AMERICAN'S
  • I am a Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Antitrust Division of the
  • carriers (other than American) to monopolize certain city pairs emanating from their hubs
  • Worth) by predatory conduct directed against low cost carriers.
  • As Deputy Assistant Attorney General, I have supervisory responsibility for directing
  • civil merger and non-merger investigations in a number of sections within the Antitrust
  • I work closely with the Directors of Civil Merger and Non-Merger
  • Enforcement and with various section chiefs and assistance chiefs to ensure that appropriate
  • TEA attorneys, in conjunction with economists within the Division's Economic Analysis
  • their hubs (other than Dallas/Ft.
  • DECLARATION OF JOHN M. NANNES IN SUPPORT OF OPP.
  • Pursuant to this procedure, when the Division desires to commence a PI, it sends the FTC a
  • Division may prepare a request for "add-on clearance," which retains the original matter
  • the Division issued Civil Investigative Demands to two carriers requesting
  • moving to compel production of documents in categories 10and.
  • The Antitrust Civil Process Act limits the disclosure of
  • materials obtained pursuant to CID,
  • The CID materials that are referenced in categories 10and consist of interrogatory
  •    |