LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

US v AMR CORP AMERICAN AIRLINES INC and AMR EAGLE HOLDING CORPORATION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 82, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: US, State: KS Kansas, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>82, Assistant Attorney, Antitrust, Investigations, Deputy Assistant, Klein, Enforcement, United States, Declaration, Responsibilities, Justice, Principal Deputy Assistant, Acting Assistant, Nannes, Delegation, Assert, Privilege, Motion, Directs, Antitrust Laws, Civil Investigations, Report, Authority, Nomination, Appointment, Prior, Competition, Prosecuting, Task Forces, Chief, Industries , ContentID: 120245988

Case Documents
1 2000-10 US OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS DOUGLAS MELAMED
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 113021
3 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . US OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS DOUGLAS MELAMED

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ANTITRUST
INVESTIGATIONS
DEPUTY ASSISTANT
KLEIN
ENFORCEMENT
UNITED STATES
DECLARATION
RESPONSIBILITIES
JUSTICE
PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSISTANT
ACTING ASSISTANT
NANNES
DELEGATION
ASSERT
PRIVILEGE
MOTION
DIRECTS
ANTITRUST LAWS
CIVIL INVESTIGATIONS
REPORT
AUTHORITY
NOMINATION
APPOINTMENT
PRIOR
COMPETITION
PROSECUTING
TASK FORCES
CHIEF
INDUSTRIES
                       IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS



                                             )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                    ))
                       Plaintiff,            ))             Civil Action No. 99-1180-JTM
               v.                            ))
AMR CORPORATION,                             )
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC, and                  )
AMERICAN EAGLE HOLDING                       )
CORPORATION,                                 ))
                       Defendants.           ))


              DECLARATION OF A. DOUGLAS MELAMED IN SUPPORT
             OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION
             TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS RESPONSIVE TO AMERICAN'S
                     FIRST AND SECOND REQUESTS FOR DOCUMENTS


I, A. Douglas Melamed, hereby declare the following to be true and correct, based on my personal

knowledge, unless otherwise indicated:

       1.      I am the Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of

United States Department of Justice under Assistant Attorney General Joel I. Klein.  I assumed this

position in October of 1996.  As Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, I hold the position of

Acting Assistant Attorney General when Mr. Klein is not present.  I am currently Acting Assistant



Attorney General.

        2.      Mr. Klein was nominated for the position of Assistant Attorney General for the

Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice by President Clinton and has held that

appointment since July 17, 1997, when his nomination was confirmed by the United States Senate.

Prior to that time, Mr. Klein was Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General under Anne K.

Bingaman and became Acting Assistant Attorney General in October 1996.

        3.      As Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division, Mr. Klein oversees and
SNIPPETS:
  • OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION
  • I am the Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the
  • United States Department of Justice under Assistant Attorney General Joel I. Klein.
  • Acting Assistant Attorney General when Mr. Klein is not present.
  • appointment since July 17, 1997, when his nomination was confirmed by the United States
  • directs the Antitrust Division.
  • The Antitrust Division is responsible for enforcement of the antitrust laws
  • and serves as the Federal Government's principal analyst of, and advocate for, competition
  • cases, prosecuting appeals, and obtaining and enforcing final judgments.
  • Mr. Klein is assisted in the performance of his responsibilities by five Deputy Assistant
  • Attorneys General, to each of whom a number of sections, task forces, and offices in the
  • report.
  • Each section is headed by a Chief and
  • Civil investigations are assigned to sections, generally on the basis of section expertise
  • with various industries.
  • Prior to the appointment of Mr. Nannes,
  • delegated authority to assert applicable privileges in antitrust litigation by the Deputy
  • The delegation provides that any assertion of privilege be in accordance with the
  • I have read the declaration of Deputy Assistant Attorney General John M.
  •    |