LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

US v AMR CORP AMERICAN AIRLINES INC and AMR EAGLE HOLDING CORPORATION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 74, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: US, State: KS Kansas, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>74, Airlines, American, Lcc, Cost, Competition, Flights, Dfw, Fares, Routes, Vanguard, Hub, Kansas, Dfw-mci, Market, Summary Judgment, Sunjet, Passengers, Dfw-ict, Dfw-cos, United States, Low Cost Carrier, Entrant Airlines, Round Trip, Dfw-lgb, Monopolize, Fort Worth, Destination, Allegations, Yield Management, Government, Cid Materials, Asta Cid Materials, Response, Declaration, Rebekah, French, Support, Motion, Clarification, Trial Staff, Connection, Discovery, Complying, Receiving, Request , ContentID: 120245964

Case Documents
1 2001-04-27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112977
139 pages
PDF
2 2000-05-09 PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION REBEKAH FRENCH IN SUPPORT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 113004
2 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 2 documents , 141 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
AMERICAN
LCC
COST
COMPETITION
FLIGHTS
DFW
FARES
ROUTES
VANGUARD
HUB
KANSAS
DFW-MCI
MARKET
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SUNJET
PASSENGERS
DFW-ICT
DFW-COS
LOW COST CARRIER
UNITED STATES
ENTRANT AIRLINES
ROUND TRIP
DFW-LGB
MONOPOLIZE
FORT WORTH
DESTINATION
ALLEGATIONS
YIELD MANAGEMENT
GOVERNMENT
                   IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                 ))
                        Plaintiff,        ))
      vs.                                 )     No. 99-1180-JTM
                                          )
AMR CORPORATION,                          )
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., and              )
AMR EAGLE HOLDING CORPORATION,            ))
                        Defendants.       )
__________________________________________)





                          MEMORANDUM AND ORDER



                                             TABLE OF CONTENTS


A.  INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

B.  FINDINGS OF FACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

          1.  SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

          2.  THE PLAINTIFF'S ALLEGATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

          3.  COMPETITION IN THE DALLAS - FORT WORTH AREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

          4.  LCC COSTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

          5.  NEW ENTRANT AIRLINE COMPETITION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

          6.  AMERICAN'S COMPETITIVE EXPERIENCE WITH LCCs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

          7.  HOW AMERICAN COMPETED ON THE ROUTES AT ISSUE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

                    a.  DFW-MCI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                    b.  DFW-ICT (Wichita) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                    c.  DFW-COS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  • FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
  • SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD
  • THE PLAINTIFF'S ALLEGATIONS
  • COMPETITION IN THE DALLAS - FORT WORTH AREA
  • LCC COSTS
  • HOW AMERICAN COMPETED ON THE ROUTES AT ISSUE
  • DFW-MCI.
  • DFW-COS.
  • DFW-LGB.
  • Air Tran Airlines.
  • Great Plains (DFW-ICT).

  • 2 . PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION REBEKAH FRENCH IN SUPPORT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ASTA CID MATERIALS
    RESPONSE
    DECLARATION
    UNITED STATES
    REBEKAH
    FRENCH
    SUPPORT
    MOTION
    CLARIFICATION
    MEMBERS
    TRIAL STAFF
    CONNECTION
    DEFENDANTS
    DISCOVERY
    COMPLYING
    RECEIVING
    REQUEST
    DISCLOSURE
    BATES-LABELING
    COPYING
    PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
    GENERAL COUNSEL
    BURTON
    RUBIN
    CONSENT
    STATUTORY PROHIBITION
    PENALTY
    PERJURY
    LAWS
    
                           IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                  FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
    
    
                                              )
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                 ))
                          Plaintiff,          ))         Civil Action No.: 99-1180-JTM
                   v.                         ))
    AMR CORPORATION,                          )
    AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., and              )
    AMR EAGLE HOLDING                         )
    CORPORATION,                              ))
                          Defendants.         ))
                  DECLARATION OF REBEKAH J. FRENCH IN SUPPORT OF
                          PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
    
    1.     My name is Rebekah J. French.  I am a lawyer for the United States in the above-
    
    captioned litigation.  I have had primary responsibility for responding to Defendants' discovery
    
    demands in this case, and for complying with the Court's May 9, 2000, Memorandum and Order
    
    ("May 9 Order").  I submit this declaration in support of the United States' Motion for
    
    Clarification of the May 9 Order.
    
    2.     I have personal knowledge of the following facts, unless otherwise noted, and could and
    
    would testify competently thereto if called upon to do so.
    
    3.     After receiving the Court's May 9 Order, I instituted a search for CID materials submitted
    
    in response to the CIDs produced to American in response to Request No. 24 of American's
    
    Second Set of Document Requests.  Unlike previous searches conducted in this case, I did not
    
    limit my selection of responsive CID materials to those materials which members of trial staff had
    
    DECLARATION OF REBEKAH FRENCH IN SUPPORT OF
    MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF MAY 9 ORDER   --     1
    
    
    
    used or intended to use in connection with this case.  My search therefore resulted in the
    
    discovery of many documents which had never been seen by members of the trial staff, much less
    
    used in connection with this case.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • DECLARATION OF REBEKAH J. FRENCH IN SUPPORT OF
  • PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
  • My name is Rebekah J. French.
  • I am a lawyer for the United States in the abovecaptioned litigation.
  • I have had primary responsibility for responding to Defendants' discovery
  • demands in this case, and for complying with the Court's May 9, 2000, Memorandum and Order
  • After receiving the Court's May 9 Order, I instituted a search for CID materials submitted
  • in response to the CIDs produced to American in response to Request No. 24 of American's
  • limit my selection of responsive CID materials to those materials which members of trial
  • used or intended to use in connection with this case.
  • bates-labeling and copying of the CID materials.
  • produced by ASTA in response to CID No. 12482 ("ASTA CID materials") resulted from our
  • Court's May 9 Order and September 14, 1999, Protective Order Governing Confidential
  • On June 6, 2000, I received a letter from ASTA's general counsel, Burton J. Rubin,
  • informing me that ASTA did not consent to the disclosure of the ASTA CID materials to
  • defendants, and would rely on the statutory prohibition against disclosure of this material.
  • I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
  •    |