 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
JOINT SUBMISSION OF THE PARTIES CONCERNING MEDIATION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MEDIATION CONFERENCE COURT JUDGE BOUDIN JOINT SUBMISSION UNITED STATES PARAGRAPH REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER PURSUANT RECOMMENDATION ATTORNEYS HON MICHAEL BOUDIN APPEALS FIRST CIRCUIT CONTACTED JUDGE BOUDIN AVAILABILITY WILLINGNESS ACT CAPACITY CONVENIENCE PARTIES ATTACH EXCERPT ALMANAC DESIRABILITY PURPOSE SUITE PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ))
Plaintiff, )) Civil Action No. 99-1180-JTM
v. ))
AMR CORPORATION, )
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC, and )
AMERICAN EAGLE HOLDING )
CORPORATION, ))
Defendants. ))
JOINT SUBMISSION OF THE PARTIES
CONCERNING MEDIATION, IN RESPONSE TO PARAGRAPH 4.G OF
THE COURT'S APRIL 13, 2000 REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER,
AND CONCERNING PROPOSED STATUS CONFERENCE DATES
Mediation
Pursuant to Paragraph 4.G of the Court's April 13, 2000, Revised Scheduling Order:
(1) the parties exchanged names of possible mediators on May 1, 2000; (2) the parties have
conferred concerning the proposed mediators; and (3) the parties hereby submit their
recommendation:
When the parties exchanged names of possible mediators, both recommended one
individual:
Hon. Michael Boudin
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Joint Submission of the Parties Concerning Mediation - 1
The parties have, of course, not contacted Judge Boudin as to his availability or willingness to act
in this capacity, but both believe that he would be capable in this role. For the Court's
convenience, the parties attach an excerpt on Judge Boudin from the Almanac of the Federal
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
