![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
HOLD SEPARATE ORDER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DIVESTITURE JUDGEMENT DIVESTITURE ASSETS COURT STIPULATION UNITED STATES KTVX-TV SEPARATE STIPULATION NEWS TELEVISION PARTIES ENTRY CHRIS-CRAFT STATION APPROVALS SUBSIDIARIES MANAGERS DMA MARKETING COMPETITOR OFFICERS EMPLOYEES SALES APPOINT ADVERTISING COMPLIANCE PROVISIONS RULING PURSUANT |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____________________________________ :
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : :
Plaintiff, : Civil Action No. 1:01CV00771
: :
v. : JUDGE: Colleen
: : Filed: 4/16/2001
THE NEWS CORPORATION LIMITED, : :
FOX TELEVISION HOLDINGS, INC., : :
and : :
CHRIS-CRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC., :
:
Defendants. : :
:
____________________________________ :
HOLD SEPARATE STIPULATION AND ORDER
It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the undersigned parties, subject to
approval and entry by the Court, that:
I.
DEFINITIONS
As used in this Hold Separate Stipulation and Order:
A. "News Corp" means defendant The News Corporation Limited, an Australian
corporation with its headquarters in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, its successors and
assigns, and its subsidiaries, divisions, groups, affiliates, partnerships and joint ventures, and
directors, officers, managers, agents, and employees.
B. "FOX" means defendant FOX Television Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
and a wholly owned subsidiary of News Corp with headquarters in Los Angeles, California, its
successors and assigns, and its subsidiaries, divisions, groups, affiliates, partnerships and joint
ventures, and their directors, officers, managers, agents, and employees.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
HOLD SEPARATE ORDER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DIVESTITURE PUMP PLANT SEPARATE STIPULATION JUDGEMENT COURT UNITED STATES ASSETS SALES TULSA PLANT PRODUCTION ENTRY PARTIES IDP REPAIR MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT MATERIALS FLOWSERVE EMPLOYEES COMPETITORS BUSINESS SCE VLT VMT DESIGNS MANAGERS COMPLIANCE PROVISIONS APPOINT |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
INGERSOLL-DRESSER PUMP COMPANY, Civil Action No. 001818
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, Judge Jackson
and
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION,
Defendants.
HOLD SEPARATE STIPULATION AND ORDER
It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the
undersigned parties, subject to approval and entry by the Court,
that:
I. DEFINITIONS
As used in this Hold Separate Stipulation and Order:
A. "Acquirer(s)" means the entity or entities to whom
defendants divest the Divestiture Assets.
B. "Divestiture Assets" means the "Divestiture Plant," "Divestiture Pump Lines,"
"Divestiture Repair Facilities," as defined below.
C. "Divestiture Plant" means Flowserve&s pump plant in Tulsa, Oklahoma, including
manufacturing equipment, tooling and fixed assets, personal property, inventory, office furniture,
materials, supplies, and other tangible property used in connection with the manufacture of the
SCE, VLT, VMT and HQ pump lines; manufacturing equipment and tooling dedicated to the
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
APPENDIX OF DOCUMENTS CITED IN PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION COURT ORDER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
EXHIBIT HOVENKAMP ANTITRUST LAW MOTION AREEDA SUPP EXCERPT RECONSIDERATION DEP UNITED STATES PLAINTIFF SUPPORT MAHER DEP RESPONSE INTERROGATORY CID KALT DEP BAUMOL DEP ORDOVER EXPERT REPORT GUNN CONGRESSMAN GLICKMAN REBEKAH FRENCH COUNSEL JUSTICE ANTITRUST DIVISION SUITE WASHINGTON |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
Plaintiff, )) Civil Action No.: 99-1180-JTM
v. ))
AMR CORPORATION, )
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., and )
AMR EAGLE HOLDING CORP. )
Defendants. )
_________________________________)
APPENDIX OF DOCUMENTS CITED IN PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S SEPTEMBER 28, 2000
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO REVIEW
Plaintiff submits copies of the following documents which are cited in its Reply in Support
Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's September 28, 2000, Order:
1. A true and correct copy of the Declaration of Herbert Hovenkamp in Support of Plaintiff's
Motion for Reconsideration is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
2. A true and correct copy of P. Areeda & H. Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law ¶714.6, n.46 (Supp.
1986) is attached hereto as Exhibit 2.
3. A true and correct copy of P. Areeda & H. Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law ¶740( Supp. 1999) is
attached hereto as Exhibit 3.
4. A true and correct copy of P. Areeda & H. Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law ¶714.6, n.51 and ¶715.2f
(Supp. 1994) is attached hereto as Exhibit 4.
5. A true and correct copy of P. Areeda & H. Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law ¶714.6, n.51 and ¶715.2f
(Supp. 1996) is attached hereto as Exhibit 5.
6. A true and correct copy of an excerpt from the Maher Dep. Tr. is attached hereto as Exhibit
7. A true and correct copy of Response to Interrogatory 4 of CID No. 15982 is attached hereto
Exhibit 7. (Filed under seal).
SNIPPETS:
|
|
4
.
ORDER GOVERNING THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MEMBERS COUNSEL DEPONENT CCTV ROOM COURT DISTRICT PARTY SEATS UNITED STATES REASONS SUFFICIENT SEATING PROTECTIVE ORDER REQUEST OBSERVE GOVERNING WEBSITES INFORMATION RELATING JUDGE TRANSCRIPTS CONFIDENTIAL SESSION COURTROOM PARAGRAPH KANSAS ELECT PURSUANT LAWSUIT INTENDING SPECTATORS PARTIES |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Plaintiff, ))
v. )) Case No. 99-1180-JTM
AMR CORPORATION, AMERICAN )
AIRLINES, INC. and AMR EAGLE )
HOLDING CORPORATION, )
Defendants. )))
PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING DEPOSITIONS
In order to: (i) provide public access to depositions in this action consistent
with 15 U.S.C. § 30 while seeking to ensure that the depositions proceed in an orderly and
expeditious manner without unnecessary disruption; and (ii) ensure the protection of confidential
information during and after the taking of oral testimony, the Court hereby orders, pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(7), that the following procedures shall apply to the taking of depositions
in this action:
1. All terms defined in the Protective Order Governing Confidential
Information ("Protective Order") entered on September 14, 1999, as may be amended by this
Court from time to time, shall have herein the same meanings ascribed to them in that
document.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC OF DEPOSITIONS
2. The party noticing any deposition shall post such notice on its website
that contains information relating to this lawsuit (www.usdoj.gov/atr or www.aadoj.com).
Since some depositions may need to be rescheduled for various reasons, those persons
intending to attend a scheduled deposition are encouraged to call Edward Soto on behalf of
American Airlines at (305) 577-3164 or Debra Williams on behalf of the Department of Justice
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |