 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
RESORTS SKI MAINE SKIING ASC S-K-I ENGLAND PRICES DISCOUNTS COMPETITION TRIPS RESIDENTS ACCOUNT TRAVEL HAMPSHIRE DISTANCE CHARGE TRANSACTION BUSINESS RAISE CLAYTON ACT DEFENDANTS PROPOSED ACQUISITION CONSUMERS MARKET UNITED STATES LIVING COMMERCE VERMONT |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_______________________________ )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
1401 H Street, N.W. )
Suite 4000 )
Washington, D.C. 20530 )
(202) 307-1858 )
)
Plaintiff, ) Civil No.:
)
v. )
) Filed:
AMERICAN SKIING )
COMPANY, and )
Access Road )
P.O. Box 450 )
Bethel, Maine 04217 )
(207) 824-3000 )
)
)
S-K-I LIMITED, )
Airport Executive Plaza )
#5 )
P.O. Box 5494 )
West Lebanon, N.H. 03784 )
(603) 298-5583 )
)
Defendants. )
_______________________________)
COMPLAINT
The United States of America, acting under the direction of
the Attorney General of the United States, brings this civil
action to obtain equitable and other relief against the
defendants named and alleges as follows:
1. The United States brings this antitrust action to
prevent the proposed acquisition by American Skiing Company
("ASC"), formerly known as LBO Resort Enterprises Corporation, of
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
COMPETITIVE IMPACT STATEMENT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
JUDGEMENT SKIING UNITED STATES ENGLAND COURT ASC S-K-I COMPETITION SKIERS COMPLAINT ALLEGES MAINE ANTITRUST ENTRY ACQUISITION CLAYTON ACT TRANSACTION ENGLAND WEEKEND COMPETITIVE IMPACT STATEMENT RESIDENTS DIVESTITURES HAMPSHIRE DEFENDANTS PROVISION ACCOMPLISH APPA UNITED STATES DISTRICT CIVIL ANTITRUST AMERICAN SKIING OWNER/OPERATORS |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
___________________________________)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ))
Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No.:
) 96-01308TPJ
)
v. ))) Filed:
AMERICAN SKIING COMPANY, and ))
S-K-I LIMITED, ))
Defendants. )
___________________________________)
COMPETITIVE IMPACT STATEMENT
The United States, pursuant to Section 2(b) of the Antitrust
Procedures and Penalties Act ("APPA"), 15 U.S.C. § 16(b)-(h),
files this Competitive Impact Statement relating to the proposed
Final Judgment submitted for entry in this civil antitrust
proceeding. I.
NATURE AND PURPOSE OF THE PROCEEDING
The United States filed a civil antitrust Complaint on June
11, 1996, alleging that American Skiing Company's ("ASC")
proposed acquisition of the ski resorts of S-K-I Limited ("S-K-
I") would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18.
The Complaint alleges that ASC and S-K-I are the two largest
owner/operators of ski resorts in New England, and that this
transaction would combine eight of the largest ski resorts in
this region. In particular, this acquisition would increase
substantially the concentration among ski resorts to which
eastern New England residents (i.e., those in Maine, eastern
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
FINAL JUDGMENT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DIVESTITURE JUDGEMENT ASSETS PLAINTIFF COURT UNITED STATES PROVISION PURCHASERS TRUSTEE ATTORNEY SKIING SERVICES CRANMORE PURPOSE WATERVILLE VALLEY REPRESENTATIVES ACCOMPLISH CALENDAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COMPETITION PURSUANT MARKETING REQUIRED DIVESTITURE COMPLIANCE ADJUDICATION COMPLAINT EMPLOYEES REAL PROPERTY BUSINESSES AFFIDAVIT |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_______________________________)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Plaintiff, ) Civil No.:
)
v. )) Filed:
AMERICAN SKIING )
COMPANY, and ))
S-K-I LIMITED, ))
Defendants. )
______________________________)
FINAL JUDGMENT
WHEREAS, plaintiff, United States of America, having filed
its Complaint herein on June , 1996, and plaintiff and
defendants, by their respective attorneys, having consented to
the entry of this Final Judgment without trial or adjudication of
any issue of fact or law herein, and without this Final Judgment
constituting any evidence against or an admission by any party
with respect to any issue of law or fact herein;
AND WHEREAS, defendants have agreed to be bound by the
provisions of this Final Judgment pending its approval by the
Court;
AND WHEREAS, the essence of this Final Judgment is prompt
and certain divestiture of assets to assure that competition is
not substantially lessened;
AND WHEREAS, plaintiff requires defendants to make certain
divestitures for the purpose of remedying the loss of competition
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
