LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

US v ALEX BROWN and SONS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: UVABAS121146, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: US, State: DC Washington D.C., UniqueCaseRef: LCD>UVABAS121146, Private Plaintiffs, United States, Antitrust, Market Makers, Stipulation, Settlement, Nasdaq, Spread, Securities, Stocks, Entry, Memorandum, Determination, Consent, Quotes, Antitrust Division, Price, Quoting Convention, Competition, Trader, Dealer Spread, Market-makers Antitrust Litigation, Intervene, Laws, Proceeding, Proposed Order, Act, Relief, Nasdaq Market-makers Antitrust, York, Violations, Tunney Act, Consent Decree, Intervention, Odd-eighth, Government, Compliance, Market Maker , ContentID: 120245942

Case Documents
1   STIPULATION AND ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112833
28 pages
PDF
2   MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION OF PLAINTIFF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112832
38 pages
PDF
3   COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112831
16 pages
PDF
4   COMPETITIVE IMPACT STATEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112830
66 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 4 documents , 148 pages
Price: $ 34.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . STIPULATION AND ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANT
COURT
SECURITIES
NASDAQ
ENTRY
PLAINTIFF
UNITED STATES
ATTORNEYS
LAWS
ANTITRUST DIVISION
MARKET MAKER
ANTITRUST COMPLIANCE
NASDAQ SECURITY
PARTY
JURISDICTION
COMPLAINT
ANTITRUST COMPLIANCE OFFICER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
DEALER SPREAD
NASD RULES
OTC DESK
MARKET MAKING
PARAGRAPHS
COMMUNICATIONS
NASH
WEISS
ADJUDICATION
EVIDENCE
DEFENDANTS HEREBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

______________________________)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,          ))
                     PLAINTIFF,    )
                )
          v.                       )     Civil Action No.
ALEX. BROWN & SONS INC.;           )
BEAR, STEARNS & CO. INC.; CS )
FIRST BOSTON CORP.; DEAN           )
WITTER REYNOLDS INC.;              )
DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE )
SECURITIES CORP.; FURMAN SELZ )
LLC; GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.;         )
HAMBRECHT & QUIST LLC; HERZOG,)
HEINE, GEDULD, INC.; J.P.          )
MORGAN SECURITIES, INC.;           )
LEHMAN BROTHERS, INC.; MAYER )
& SCHWEITZER, INC.; MERRILL        )
LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH,)
INC.; MORGAN STANLEY & CO.,        )
INC.; NASH, WEISS & CO.; OLDE )
DISCOUNT CORP.; PAINEWEBBER        )
INC.; PIPER JAFFRAY INC.;          )
PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC.;        )
SALOMON BROTHERS INC.;             )
SHERWOOD SECURITIES CORP.;         )
SMITH BARNEY INC.; SPEAR           )
LEEDS & KELLOGG, LP; and           )
UBS SECURITIES LLC                 ))
                DEFENDANTS.        )
______________________________)




                           STIPULATION AND ORDER

     WHEREAS, plaintiff, United States of America, having filed

its complaint on July 17, 1996, and plaintiff and defendants, by

their respective attorneys, having agreed to the entry of this

stipulation and order without trial or adjudication of any issue



SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
  • LUFKIN & JENRETTE) SECURITIES CORP.;
  • INC.; NASH, WEISS & CO.; OLDE)
  • WHEREAS, plaintiff, United States of America, having filed
  • their respective attorneys, having agreed to the entry of this
  • stipulation and order without trial or adjudication of any issue
  • constituting any evidence against or an admission by any party
  • without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law herein,
  • Plaintiff and defendants hereby agree as follows:
  • JURISDICTION AND VENUE
  • particular Nasdaq security.
  • market maker offers to buy a specific quantity of a particular
  • "Dealer spread" means the difference between a market
  • E. "Defendant" means a defendant that has executed this
  • M. "OTC desk" means any organizational element of a
  • responsibilities include market making in any Nasdaq security,
  • required by Nasdaq or NASD rules or the size
  • required by the federal securities laws,
  • Initiate and maintain an antitrust compliance program,
  • designation of the Antitrust Compliance Officer,
  • Obtain from each person designated in paragraphs
  • Within forty-five days of entry of this
  • Antitrust Division for review and approval.
  • The Court having reviewed the Complaint and other filings by

  • 2 . MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION OF PLAINTIFF

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COURT
    SETTLEMENT
    UNITED STATES
    DEFENDANTS
    ANTITRUST
    MEMORANDUM
    DETERMINATION
    CONSENT
    ENTRY
    MARKET-MAKERS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
    LAW
    INTERVENE
    PROCEEDING
    PROPOSED ORDER
    RELIEF
    NASDAQ MARKET-MAKERS ANTITRUST
    TUNNEY ACT
    CONSENT DECREE
    INTERVENTION
    GOVERNMENT
    AMICUS CURIAE
    NASDAQ STOCKS
    DISCLOSURE
    DISTRICT COURT
    CID
    MARKET MAKERS
    VIOLATIONS
    ANTITRUST DIVISION
    EVIDENTIARY MATERIALS
    
                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
                             THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
    
    _____________________________)
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,        ))
              PLAINTIFF,             )) Civil Action No. 96 CIV 5313 (RWS)
                   v.                ))
    ALEX. BROWN & SONS, INC.         )
         et al.                      ))
              DEFENDANTS.            )
    _____________________________)
    
              MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION OF PLAINTIFFS IN THE
                    IN RE NASDAQ MARKET-MAKERS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
                         TO INTERVENE OR TO APPEAR AS AMICUS CURIAE
    
         The United States opposes the motion of the plaintiffs in a private
    
    civil damages case, In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation, who
    
    have sued certain market makers in Nasdaq stocks under the antitrust laws
    
    (hereinafter "private plaintiffs") to intervene in this antitrust action by
    
    the United States for injunctive relief against several of the same
    
    defendants; in addition, the United States opposes the private plaintiffs'
    
    alternate suggestion, that they be allowed to participate as amicus curiae
    
    in this proceeding to determine whether entry of the proposed consent
    
    settlement is "in the public interest." 15 U.S.C. 16(e).
    
         In making this "public interest" determination, "the court's function
    
    is not to determine whether the resulting array of rights and liabilities
    
    is the one that will best serve society, but only to confirm that the
    
    resulting settlement is within the reaches of the public interest." United
    
    States v. Microsoft Corp., 56 F.3d 1448, 1460-61 (D.C. Cir. 1995) (emphasis
    
    in original) (internal quotations omitted); accord, United States v.
    
    
    
    Bechtel Corp., 648 F.2d 660, 666 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
  • MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION OF PLAINTIFFS IN THE
  • IN RE NASDAQ MARKET-MAKERS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
  • TO INTERVENE OR TO APPEAR AS AMICUS CURIAE
  • The United States opposes the motion of the plaintiffs in a private
  • civil damages case, In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation, who
  • have sued certain market makers in Nasdaq stocks under the antitrust laws
  • the United States opposes the private plaintiffs'
  • resulting settlement is within the reaches of the public interest."
  • either mandatory or permissive intervention in a Tunney Act proceeding is
  • showing that the Government has failed `fairly,
  • for private parties to present their views regarding of the proposed relief
  • quotations on a substantial number of Nasdaq stocks.
  • submitted by the defendants and others,
  • defendants filed a proposed Stipulation and Order ("proposed order") to
  • Entry of the proposed order is
  • private plaintiffs seek intervention to challenge paragraph
  • Antitrust Division, the SEC, the NASD, or any other selfregulatory organization, as defined
  • the Settlement Memorandum contains confidential evidentiary materials gathered by the
  • In March 1996, the Court ruled that although CID materials may not be discovered from the
  • public interest determination required to be made under the Tunney Act.
  • in any way be "impair" by entry of the consent decree.
  • files because "only following disclosure of the Compilation of Evidence.
  • In evaluating the decree as a remedy for the particular violations alleged, the Court must
  • the district court in Microsoft

  • 3 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    YORK
    MARKET MAKERS
    BUSINESS
    NASDAQ
    STOCKS
    LAWS
    DELAWARE
    PRICES
    SPREAD
    BID
    SECURITIES
    QUOTING CONVENTION
    COMPLAINT
    UNDERSTANDING
    COMMON
    QUOTES
    DEALER SPREAD
    UNITED STATES
    VIOLATION
    ATTORNEY
    SHERMAN ACT
    TRANSACTION
    JERSEY
    ANTITRUST DIVISION
    PLAINTIFF
    RESTRAIN
    COMPETITION
    ALLEGES
    SELL
    
    Hays Gorey, Jr. (HG 1946)
    United States Department of Justice
    Antitrust Division
    600 E Street, N.W., Room 9500
    Washington D.C. 20530
    (202) 307-6200
    Attorney for Plaintiff United States of America
    
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
    THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
    ______________________________)
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,         ))
                       PLAINTIFF,     )
              )v.                      )    Civil Action No.
    ALEX. BROWN & SONS INC.;          )
    BEAR, STEARNS & CO. INC.; CS )
    FIRST BOSTON CORP.; DEAN          )     COMPLAINT FOR EQUITABLE
    WITTER REYNOLDS INC.;             )     RELIEF FOR VIOLATION OF
    DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE )          15 U.S.C. § 1
    SECURITIES CORP.; FURMAN SELZ )
    LLC; GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.;        )
    HAMBRECHT & QUIST LLC; HERZOG,)
    HEINE, GEDULD, INC.; J.P.         )
    MORGAN SECURITIES, INC.;          )
    LEHMAN BROTHERS, INC.; MAYER )
    & SCHWEITZER, INC.; MERRILL       )
    LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH,)
    INC.; MORGAN STANLEY & CO.,       )
    INC.; NASH, WEISS & CO.; OLDE )
    DISCOUNT CORP.; PAINEWEBBER       )
    INC.; PIPER JAFFRAY INC.;         )
    PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC.;       )
    SALOMON BROTHERS INC.;            )
    SHERWOOD SECURITIES CORP.;        )
    SMITH BARNEY INC.; SPEAR,         )
    LEEDS & KELLOGG, LP; and          )
    UBS SECURITIES LLC,               ))
                      DEFENDANTS.     ))
                                     COMPLAINT
    
        The United States of America, acting under the direction of
    
    the Attorney General, brings this civil action pursuant to
    
    Section 4 of the Sherman Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 4, to
    
    
    
    obtain equitable and other relief to prevent and restrain
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division
  • Attorney for Plaintiff United States of America
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
  • SECURITIES CORP.; FURMAN SELZ)
  • obtain equitable and other relief to prevent and restrain
  • violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.
  • For its Complaint, the United States alleges:
  • Each of the defendants resides,
  • transact business, or is transacting business in this District.
  • organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland,
  • organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware,
  • organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey,
  • - 5 market maker on Nasdaq and purchased and sold stock on Nasdaq.
  • Nasdaq market makers, including the defendants, have
  • the violation alleged in this Complaint,
  • Defendants are major "market makers" in Nasdaq stocks.
  • are willing to buy and sell particular Nasdaq stocks.
  • A market maker's bid is
  • known as its "dealer spread."
  • quoting bid and ask prices on Nasdaq for particular stocks.
  • the greater the transaction costs for buying and selling
  • Defendants and other market makers have reached a common
  • understanding to adhere to the quoting convention.
  • complete absence of bid or ask price quotes in oddeighths;
  • price competition among the defendants and coconspirators in the purchase and sale of Nasdaq

  • 4 . COMPETITIVE IMPACT STATEMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MARKET MAKERS
    ANTITRUST
    SPREAD
    UNITED STATES
    STOCKS
    COURT
    NASDAQ
    PRICE
    QUOTES
    TRADER
    COMPETITION
    QUOTING CONVENTION
    SECURITIES
    DEALER SPREAD
    ACT
    ODD-EIGHTH
    ANTITRUST DIVISION
    COMPLIANCE
    COMPETITIVE IMPACT STATEMENT
    APPA
    VIOLATIONS
    INCREMENTS
    NASD
    CHINESE MARKET
    STIPULATION
    MARKET DATA
    RETAIL CUSTOMERS
    ANTITRUST LAWS
    INSTITUTIONS
    
    Hays Gorey, Jr. (HG 1946)
    United States Department of Justice
    Antitrust Division
    600 E Street, N.W., Room 9500
    Washington D.C. 20530
    (202) 307-6200
    Attorney for Plaintiff United States of America
    
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
    THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
    ______________________________)
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,        ))
                       PLAINTIFF,    )
              )v.                    )     Civil Action No.
    ALEX. BROWN & SONS INC.;         )
    BEAR, STEARNS & CO. INC.; CS )
    FIRST BOSTON CORP.; DEAN         )
    WITTER REYNOLDS INC.;            )
    DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE )
    SECURITIES CORP.; FURMAN SELZ )
    LLC; GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.;       )
    HAMBRECHT & QUIST LLC; HERZOG,)
    HEINE, GEDULD, INC.; J.P.        )
    MORGAN SECURITIES, INC.;         )
    LEHMAN BROTHERS, INC.; MAYER )
    & SCHWEITZER INC.; MERRILL       )
    LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH,)
    INC.; MORGAN STANLEY & CO.,      )
    INC.; NASH, WEISS & CO.; OLDE )
    DISCOUNT CORP.; PAINEWEBBER      )
    INC.; PIPER JAFFRAY INC.;        )
    PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC.;      )
    SALOMON BROTHERS INC.;           )
    SHERWOOD SECURITIES CORP.;       )
    SMITH BARNEY INC.; SPEAR,        )
    LEEDS & KELLOGG, LP; and         )
    UBS SECURITIES, LLC.             ))
                      DEFENDANTS.    )
    ______________________________)
    
    
                          COMPETITIVE IMPACT STATEMENT
    
         Pursuant to Section 2(b) of the Antitrust Procedures and
    
    Penalties Act ("APPA" or "Tunney Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 16(b)-(h),
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
  • PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC.;)
  • Penalties Act ("APPA" or "Tunney Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 16-,
  • the United States submits this Competitive Impact Statement
  • entry with the consent of defendants in this civil antitrust
  • Stipulation and Order to resolve the
  • The defendants are all major "market makers" in over-the-counter stocks quoted for public
  • others adhered to and enforced a "quoting convention" that was
  • designed to and did deter price competition among the defendants
  • The term "Nasdaq" was originally an acronym for the "National Association of Securities
  • not restrained competition through their illegal agreement.
  • antitrust compliance program and designate an antitrust
  • violations of the proposed Order within ten business days to the
  • quantities of market data produced in computer-readable format by
  • operations and activities of the NASD and the Nasdaq market since
  • Dealer Quotes and the Dealer Spread.
  • "best execution" for the retail customers.
  • the price increments a market maker can use to adjust or "update"
  • makers can quote bid and ask prices on Nasdaq in odd-eighth
  • sell) more stock than the trader wants,
  • creating a "Chinese market."
  • in violation of the antitrust laws.
  •    |