LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN RE PETITION OF MACCAFERRI GABIONS INC Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IRPOMGI194301, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, State: MD Maryland, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>IRPOMGI194301, Maccaferri, Gabions, Agreement, Response, United States, Memorandum, Document Request, Gabion, Interrogatory, Request, Cid, Civil Investigative Demand, Competition, Bid, Motion, Fastening Tools, Scope, Stating, Spenax Sc-50, Klayman, Spenax, Supplemental Response, Understanding, Evidence, Antitrust, Hog Rings, Objection, Relating, Manufacturers, Sc-50, Market, Gabion Manufacturers, Documents Relating, Employees, Exclusive Dealing, Exclusive Dealing Agreement, Stipulation, Negotiate, Moltenbrey , ContentID: 120245926

Case Documents
1   FINAL ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112746
1 pages
PDF
2 2000-05 STIPULATION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112750
2 pages
PDF
3 1995-08-25 MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112749
16 pages
PDF
4 1995-08-25 MEMO OF US POSITION REGARDING UNRESOLVED ISSUES RELATING TO SCOPE OF CID
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112747
11 pages
PDF
5 1995-03-09 MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112748
3 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 5 documents , 33 pages
Price: $ 39.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . FINAL ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MOTION
MACCAFERRI
COURT
KLAYMAN
WASHINGTON
ENFORCE
ORDER HOLDING MACCAFERRI
CONTEMPT
CONSENT
PARTIES HERETO
HEREBY
MACCAFERRI GABIONS
PAY
CLERK
SUM
ENTRY
MOTIONS PENDING
PREJUDICE
LARRY KLAYMAN
SCHOOL STREET
SUITE
MARY JEAN MOLTENBREY
DOUGLAS
HILLEBOE JEFFREY
STEGER
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
JUSTICE
ANTITRUST DIVISION
CIVIL TASK FORCE
                                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                              DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

                                                                                              DATE
                                                               )
      In Re: PETITION OF                                       )                    Civil No.
                  MACCAFERRI GABIONS, INC.                     )
                                                               )


 FINAL
                                                               ORDER

           Upon review of the entire record in this case, the United States' Motion to Enforce this

Court's Order Holding Maccaferri in Contempt, and the consent of the parties hereto, it is hereby

           ORDERED that Maccaferri Gabions, Inc. shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the sum of

Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) within 30 days of the entry of this Order; and it is

           FURTHER ORDERED that all other motions pending before this Court in this action are

dismissed with prejudice.



 Dated:_________9/9/96_____________    ___/S/_______________________
                                                 United States District Court Judge



Copies to:
 Larry Klayman
Klayman & Associates, P.C.
501 School Street, S.W., Suite 700
Washington, D.C.  20024
 Mary Jean Moltenbrey
Douglas L. Hilleboe
Jeffrey I. Steger
United States Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
Civil Task Force
325 7th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20530




SNIPPETS:
  • Upon review of the entire record in this case, the United States' Motion to Enforce this
  • Court's Order Holding Maccaferri in Contempt, and the consent of the parties hereto, it is
  • ORDERED that Maccaferri Gabions, Inc. shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the sum of
  • Five Thousand Dollars within 30 days of the entry of this Order;
  • FURTHER ORDERED that all other motions pending before this Court in this action are
  • dismissed with prejudice.
  • Copies to: Larry Klayman
  • Klayman & Associates, P.C. 501 School Street, S.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20024
  • Mary Jean Moltenbrey
  • Douglas L. Hilleboe Jeffrey I. Steger
  • United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division Civil Task Force
  • 325 7th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530

  • 2 . STIPULATION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PARTY
    PARTIES
    ATTORNEYS
    APPEALS
    COURT
    CIRCUIT
    BEAR
    ATTORNEYS FEES
    COSTS
    PARTIES CONSENT
    ENTERED PURSUANT
    EFFECT WHATEVER
    PREJUDICE
    EXECUTION
    ENTRY
    SETTLES
    DISCHARGES
    CIVIL
    INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND
    FREEDOM
    INFORMATION ACT LITIGATION
    EVIDENCE
    ADMISSION
    LAW
    LARRY
    KLAYMAN
    COUNSEL
    ANTITRUST
    WASHINGTON
    
                                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                           DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
                                                                                   DATE FILED 9/9/96
    
                                                                        )
          In Re: PETITION OF                                            )             Civ. No.
                    MACCAFERRI GABIONS, INC.                            )
                                                                        )
        STIPULATION
    
    
               It is stipulated by and between the undersigned parties, by their respective attorneys,
    
    
    
               (1)  Maccaferri will file motions for voluntary dismissal of its Appeal Nos. 96-1294 and
    
               96-1513, currently pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit,
    
               each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs;
    
               (2)  the parties consent that the Court may file and enter a Final Order in the form
    
               attached to this Stipulation, without further notice to any party or other proceedings;
    
               (3)  in the event the proposed Final Order is not entered pursuant to this Stipulation,
    
               Stipulation shall be of no effect whatever, and the making of this Stipulation shall be
    
               without prejudice to either party in this or any other proceeding;
    
               (4)  the parties' execution of this Stipulation and the entry of the proposed Final Order
    
               settles, discharges, and releases any and all claims by either party arising from the
    
               Investigative Demand  and Freedom of Information Act  litigation;  and
    
    
    
    
    
                                                           1
    
    
    
                   (5)  this Final Order shall not be evidence against or an admission by any party with
    
                   respect to any issue of fact or law herein.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • It is stipulated by and between the undersigned parties, by their respective attorneys, that:
  • 96-1513, currently pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit,
  • each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs;
  • the parties consent that the Court may file and enter a Final Order in the form
  • attached to this Stipulation, without further notice to any party or other proceedings;
  • in the event the proposed Final Order is not entered pursuant to this Stipulation,
  • Stipulation shall be of no effect whatever, and the making of this Stipulation shall be
  • without prejudice to either party in this or any other proceeding;
  • the parties' execution of this Stipulation and the entry of the proposed Final Order
  • settles, discharges, and releases any and all claims by either party arising from the Civil
  • Investigative Demand and Freedom of Information Act litigation;
  • this Final Order shall not be evidence against or an admission by any party with
  • respect to any issue of fact or law herein.
  • Larry
  • Klayman M.J.
  • Counsel
  • Antitrust
  • Washington,

  • 3 . MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    GABIONS
    AGREEMENT
    RESPONSE
    MEETING
    DOCUMENT REQUEST
    MEMORANDUM
    UNITED STATES
    COURT
    SCOPE
    INTERROGATORY
    MOTION
    CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND
    STATING
    SPENAX SC-50
    SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE
    ATTORNEYS
    UNDERSTANDING
    BID
    CID
    GABION MANUFACTURERS
    DOCUMENTS RELATING
    FASTENING TOOLS
    EXCLUSIVE DEALING AGREEMENT
    COMPETITION
    ANTITRUST
    HOG RINGS
    EMPLOYEES
    OBJECTION
    RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS RELATING
    
                                     UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                          DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
               [FILED
                                                                                      9/14/95]
    
                                                               )
          In Re:  PETITION OF                                  )          Civil No. MJG95-1270
                    MACCAFERRI GABIONS, INC.                   )
                                                               )
    
                              MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE
    
    
               The United States Department of Justice ("the Department"), by its undersigned attorneys,
    
    moves this Court to allow the Department to file a Supplemental Response to this Court's
    
    Memorandum and Order dated August 25, 1995.  This Motion is based upon the following
    
    grounds:
    
               1.     On September 6, 1995, the Department meet with Maccaferri Gabions, Inc.
    
    ("Maccaferri") to discuss possible modifications to the scope of Civil Investigative Demand
    
    12316.  At the meeting, the Department agreed to provide Maccaferri with a letter stating the
    
    Department's understanding of the agreements reached.  Maccaferri represented to the
    
    Department that it would respond to this letter by Friday, September 8 at 10:00 am.
    
               2.     On September 7, the Department sent a letter by facsimile to Maccaferri stating
    
    Department's understanding of the agreements reached at the September 6 meeting.  The
    
    Department did not receive any substantive response to this letter, even after it made several
    
    attempts to discuss the letter with counsel for Maccaferri.
    
               3.     Given Maccaferri's decision not to respond substantively to the Department, the
    
    Department had to file its Response to this Court's Order on September 8 without knowing the
    
    extent to which it had reached agreement with Maccaferri and whether additional differences
    
    remained.
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE
  • The United States Department of Justice, by its undersigned attorneys,
  • moves this Court to allow the Department to file a Supplemental Response to this Court's
  • Memorandum and Order dated August 25,
  • On September 6, 1995, the Department meet with Maccaferri Gabions, Inc.
  • to discuss possible modifications to the scope of Civil Investigative Demand
  • the Department agreed to provide Maccaferri with a letter stating the
  • Department's understanding of the agreements reached at the September 6 meeting.
  • extent to which it had reached agreement with Maccaferri and whether additional differences
  • Antitrust Division
  • I certify that I have served, by first class mail, a copy of the foregoing United States'
  • The following summarizes the Department's understanding of the agreements reached during our
  • The Department is also willing to consider excluding additional categories of employees that
  • Interrogatory No. 3: We agreed that in response to Interrogatory No. 3, Maccaferri will
  • Without waiving that objection, Maccaferri suggested narrowing to a sample of 20 bids.
  • We are willing to consider other ways to narrow the request, but we need to know where and
  • Document Request No. 2: Maccaferri offered to provide responsive documents relating to the
  • The Department offered to limit the request to responsive documents relating to the Spenax
  • We agreed that Maccaferri will produce all documents referring to Stanley Spenax or the
  • two known twisted wire gabion manufacturers.
  • whereby Maccaferri is the only gabion manufacturer allowed to sell or purchase the Spenax
  • An exclusive dealing agreement will be found unlawful if it "will foreclose competition

  • 4 . MEMO OF US POSITION REGARDING UNRESOLVED ISSUES RELATING TO SCOPE OF CID

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    REQUEST
    GABION
    COMPETITION
    AGREEMENT
    SPENAX
    INTERROGATORY
    CID
    KLAYMAN
    RELATING
    MANUFACTURERS
    SC-50
    MARKET
    UNITED STATES
    MEMORANDUM
    RESPONSE
    MEETING
    EXCLUSIVE DEALING
    BID
    FASTENING TOOLS
    EVIDENCE
    CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND
    NEGOTIATE
    MOLTENBREY
    OBJECTION
    EMPLOYEES
    COUNSEL
    EXHIBIT
    COURT
    HOG RINGS
    
                                   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                        DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
    
                                                              [FILED
                                                                        9/8/95]
    
                                                        )
         In Re:  PETITION OF                            )             Civil No. MJG95-1270
               MACCAFERRI GABIONS, INC.                 )
                                                        )
    
               UNITED STATES' MEMORANDUM STATING THE UNITED STATES'
                    POSITION REGARDING UNRESOLVED ISSUES RELATING
                     TO THE SCOPE OF CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND 12316
    
    
              The United States Department of Justice ("the Department") respectfully submits this
    
    Memorandum in response to this Court's Memorandum and Order dated August 25, 1995.
    
    
    
     INTRODUCTION
    
              Since issuing the CID on March 9, 1995, the Department has repeatedly expressed to
    
    Maccaferri its willingness to negotiate the scope of the CID.  The Department has also repeatedly
    
    asked Maccaferri to provide it with certain basic information about its files and employees so that
    
    the Department could identify ways that the CID could be modified consistent with the
    
    Department's need for evidence and information.  Maccaferri has repeatedly refused to provide
    
    the Department with that information, and has refused to engage in negotiations with the
    
    Department.
    
              In response to the Court's Memorandum and Order, on August  31, the Department
    
    contacted Maccaferri's counsel to arrange a meeting to attempt to negotiate the CID. See Exhibit
    
    A.  The Department again asked Maccaferri to provide it with certain information concerning
    
    Maccaferri's files.  After first declining to meet with the staff conducting the investigation.
    
    Maccaferri agreed to meet with the Department on September 6.  See Exhibits B, C, D, E and F.
    
              At the September 6 meeting, Maccaferri again declined to provide the Department with
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES' MEMORANDUM STATING THE UNITED STATES'
  • POSITION REGARDING UNRESOLVED ISSUES RELATING
  • Memorandum in response to this Court's Memorandum and Order dated August 25,
  • Maccaferri its willingness to negotiate the scope of the CID.
  • Department's need for evidence and information.
  • contacted Maccaferri's counsel to arrange a meeting to attempt to negotiate the CID.
  • Exhibit G. Maccaferri had agreed to respond to that letter no later
  • Moltenbrey made several calls to Maccaferri's counsel to discuss any differences that might
  • Mr. Klayman first stated that the differences were minor, and that he would respond to the
  • his understanding of the agreements in his filing with the Court.
  • agreements and practices in the gabion,
  • two known twisted wire gabion manufacturers.
  • Spenax manufactures C-rings, also known as hog rings, which are metal rings that are
  • Spenax also manufacturers the SC-50,
  • whereby Maccaferri is the only gabion manufacturer allowed to sell or purchase the Spenax
  • An exclusive dealing agreement will be found unlawful if it "will foreclose competition
  • pre-emption of that share of the market might have on effective competition therein."
  • Interrogatory Number 18 asks for information regarding each bid that Maccaferri
  • employees to work with 11 area managers for at least one year.
  • Document Request Number 2
  • specific objection to this request, and indeed, failed to mention its objection before the
  • ORDERED that Civil Investigative Demand 12316 is modified as follows:

  • 5 . MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL ORDER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COURT
    UNITED STATES
    CID
    CIVIL
    ANTITRUST
    GABION
    CIVIL CONTEMPT
    MOTION
    STIPULATION
    ENTRY
    REQUIRING
    HOLDING
    EVIDENCE
    REVIEW
    GABION FASTENING INDUSTRIES
    MARKET DEVELOPMENTS
    INTEND
    COMPLAINT
    RESOLVE
    OUTSTANDING
    CIVIL ACTION
    ANNE
    BINGAMAN
    CHIEF
    JOEL
    KLEIN
    REBECCA
    DICK
    WASHINGTON
    
                                                     UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                               DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
                                                                                       DATE FILE 9/9/96
                                                             )
           In Re: PETITION OF                                )                    Civ. No. MJG95-1270
                      MACCAFERRI GABIONS, INC.               )
                                                             )
    
                                                            MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL ORDER
    
    
                The United States Department of Justice ("Department"), having filed this date a
    
    Stipulation, hereby moves this Court for entry of the attached proposed Final Order that has been
    
    agreed to by the Department and Maccaferri Gabions, Inc. ("Maccaferri").  By agreement of the
    
    parties the Proposed Order provides that Maccaferri pay to the Clerk of the Court $5,000.
    
                On March 9, 1995, the Department  issued to Maccaferri Civil Investigative Demand
    
    12316 ("the CID") pursuant to the Antitrust Civil Process Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1312.  On April 28,
    
    1995, Maccaferri filed a Petition to Modify or Set Aside the CID.  On February 23, 1996, this
    
    Court entered a Final Order requiring, inter alia, Maccaferri to comply with the CID as modified
    
    by this Court ("Final Order").
    
                On April 16, 1996, this Court issued an Order ("Contempt Order") holding Maccaferri  in
    
    civil contempt for failure to produce information and documents responsive to the CID as
    
    required by this Court's Final Order.  Beginning on April 16 and continuing through May 31,
    
    1996, Maccaferri produced to the United States information and documents responsive to the
    
    CID.
    
                On June 20, 1996, the United States filed a Motion to Enforce this Court's Order Holding
    
    Maccaferri in Civil Contempt.  On July 3, 1996, Maccaferri filed its Reply to the United States'
    
    Motion and on July 5, 1996, Maccaferri filed a Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs.
    
                On August 7, 1996, the Department informed Maccaferri that it had completed its review
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Stipulation, hereby moves this Court for entry of the attached proposed Final Order that has
  • parties the Proposed Order provides that Maccaferri pay to the Clerk of the Court $5,000.
  • On March 9, 1995, the Department issued to Maccaferri Civil Investigative Demand
  • Maccaferri filed a Petition to Modify or Set Aside the CID.
  • Court entered a Final Order requiring, inter alia, Maccaferri to comply with the CID as
  • Maccaferri produced to the United States information and documents responsive to the
  • On June 20, 1996, the United States filed a Motion to Enforce this Court's Order Holding
  • Maccaferri in Civil Contempt.
  • On August 7, 1996, the Department informed Maccaferri that it had completed its review
  • of the evidence collected during its investigation of the gabion and gabion fastening
  • informed Maccaferri that based on the evidence gathered, as well as recent market
  • that it did not intend to file a complaint at this time, and expected that the investigation
  • will resolve all outstanding matters related to this civil action.
  • the Department respectfully moves this Court for entry of the proposed Final Order.
  • Anne
  • Bingaman
  • Antitrust Division
  • Chief,
  • Joel
  • Klein
  • Rebecca
  • Dick
  • Washington,
  •    |