LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

COMMUNITY PUBLISHERS INC v DR PARTNERS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: CPIVDP204365, CourtName: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Plaintiff: COMMUNITY PUBLISHERS INC, State: AR Arkansas, UniqueCaseRef: LCD>CPIVDP204365, Newspaper, Nat, District, Market, United States, Northwest Arkansas, Morning News, Appellants, Media, Thomson, Donrey, Fayetteville, Competition, Advertising, Papers, Local Daily Newspaper, Stephens, Daily Record, Advertisers, Appeals, Relevant Market, Antitrust, Community Publishers, Cir, Merger Guidelines, Price, Acquisition, Donrey Media Group, Washington, Fort Smith, Morning News Compete, Circulation, Antitrust Law, Elasticity, Benton County, Clayton Act, Jack Stephens, Springdale , ContentID: 120245923

Case Documents
1   AMICUS US
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112739
51 pages
PDF
2 1995-06-30 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112740
61 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 2 documents , 112 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . AMICUS US

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DISTRICT
APPELLANTS
NAT
NEWSPAPER
UNITED STATES
MORNING NEWS
MARKET
MEDIA
PAPERS
APPEALS
THOMSON
NORTHWEST ARKANSAS
CIR
COMPETITION
PRICE
ADVERTISING
COMMUNITY PUBLISHERS
FAYETTEVILLE
RELEVANT MARKET
DAILY RECORD
MORNING NEWS COMPETE
CIRCULATION
ADVERTISERS
ELASTICITY
ACQUISITION
SPRINGDALE
GUIDELINES
DONREY MEDIA GROUP
GEOGRAPHIC MARKET

                              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                             FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                               Nos. 95-2976 & 95-3165
                                                 Consolidated Cases

                          COMMUNITY PUBLISHERS, INC.; and SHEARIN, INC.
                                   d/b/a SHEARIN & COMPANY REALTORS,
                                                        Plaintiffs-Appellees,
               v.
               DR PARTNERS d/b/a DONREY MEDIA GROUP; NAT, L.C.; THOMSON
                    NEWSPAPERS, INC.; and THE NORTHWEST ARKANSAS TIMES,
                                                        Defendants-Appellants.

                                       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                        Plaintiff-Appellee,
               v.

                     NAT, L.C. and DR PARTNERS d/b/a DONREY MEDIA GROUP,
                                                        Defendants-Appellants.
                             ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                       FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
                                   BRIEF FOR APPELLEE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


                                                                        ANNE K. BINGAMAN
                                                                          Assistant Attorney General

             Of Counsel:                                                JOEL I. KLEIN
                                                                          Deputy Assistant Attorney
             CRAIG W. CONRATH
             PHILIP R. MALONE                                           ROBERT B. NICHOLSON
             ALLEE A. RAMADHAN                                          MARK S. POPOFSKY
             ALEXANDER Y. THOMAS                                          Attorneys
             BRIGID L. THOMAS
               Attorneys                                                  Antitrust Division
                                                                          Appellate Section
               Antitrust Division                                         U.S. Department of Justice
               U.S. Department of Justice                                 10th & Pennsylvania Ave.,
               1401 H Street, N.W.                                        Washington, D.C.  20530
               Washington, D.C.  20530                                    (202) 514-3764







SNIPPETS:
  • DR PARTNERS d/b/a DONREY MEDIA GROUP; NAT,
  • Appellants' summary of the case is substantially accurate.
  • the United States requests thirty minutes in which to present oral
  • THE COURT MAY AFFIRM THE FINDING OF A SECTION 7 VIOLATION AS LONG AS THE DISTRICT COURT DID
  • NEWSPAPER MARKET
  • THE DISTRICT COURT CORRECTLY DETERMINED THAT THE TIMES AND THE MORNING NEWS COMPETE FOR
  • 687 F.2d 1173 (8th Cir.
  • Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission, Horizontal Merger
  • both in the case brought by the United States and that brought by Community Publishers,
  • Court accordingly did not name the United States as a party to these appeals (Nos.
  • Whether this Court may affirm the judgment that the acquisition violates section 7 of the
  • Whether the district court correctly concluded that the effect of the acquisition may be
  • Northwest Arkansas.
  • The Times, although based in Fayetteville, has
  • in Springdale, has a very significant presence in Fayetteville.2/ Together, the two papers
  • NAT obtained the Times from Thomson Newspapers,
  • one-hundred papers (T.
  • a $2 million premium over its previously indicated asking price (T.
  • In the two Fayetteville zip codes encompassed within the relevant market alleged by the
  • relevant product markets consisted of advertising in, and readership of, local daily
  • geographic market was the Fayetteville Metropolitan area, as the government defines it, there
  • 11 We use "elasticity" of demand to encompass both the "cross-elasticity" test, which

  • 2 . OPINION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COURT
    NORTHWEST ARKANSAS
    MARKET
    DONREY
    NAT
    PLAINTIFFS
    THOMSON
    UNITED STATES
    MORNING NEWS
    MEDIA
    LOCAL DAILY NEWSPAPER
    STEPHENS
    FAYETTEVILLE
    ANTITRUST
    COMPETITION
    ADVERTISING
    MERGER GUIDELINES
    WASHINGTON
    DAILY RECORD
    ADVERTISERS
    FORT SMITH
    DONREY MEDIA GROUP
    ANTITRUST LAW
    RELEVANT MARKET
    BENTON COUNTY
    CLAYTON ACT
    JACK STEPHENS
    ACQUISITION
    COMMUNITY PUBLISHERS
    
    COMMUNITY PUBLISHERS, INC.;
                   and SHEARIN INC. d/b/a SHEARIN & COMPANY REALTORS,
                                                   PLAINTIFFS
                                             v.
                          DONREY CORP. d/b/a DONREY MEDIA GROUP;
                          NAT, L.C.; THOMSON NEWSPAPERS, INC.; and
                               THE NORTHWEST ARKANSAS TIMES,
                                                   DEFENDANTS;
    
                                UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                   PLAINTIFF
                                            v.
                 NAT, L.C. and D.R. PARTNERS d/b/a DONREY MEDIA GROUP,
                                                   DEFENDANTS
    
                          COMMUNITY PUBLRS., INC. v. DONREY CORP.
                           Civil No. 95-5026, Civil No. 95-5048
                UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
                              ARKANSAS, FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
                                1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9514
    
                                    June 30, 1995, Decided
                                    June 30, 1995, FILED
    
    COUNSEL:      [*1]     For Community Publishers, Shearin Inc., Plaintiffs:
    Philip S. Anderson, Peter G. Kumpe, J. Leon Holmes, Jeanne L. Seewald,
    Williams and Anderson, Little Rock, AR. Mr. Tom Burke, Burke & Eldridge,
    Fayetteville, AR. For United States, Plaintiff: Anne K. Bingaman,
    Constance K. Robinson, Craig W. Conrath, Allee A. Ramadhan; Phillip R.
    Malone; Burney P.C. Huber; Nora W. Terres; Anne M. Purcell; Alexander Y.
    Thomas; Brigid L. Kerrigan, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
    Mr. Larry McCord, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Fort Smith, AR.
    
    For NAT, L.C., Defendant: Jerry C. Jones, Kenneth Shemin, Amy Lee Stewart
    & Grant Fortson, Rose Law Firm, Little Rock, AR. Woody Bassett, Bassett
    Law Firm, Fayetteville, AR. For Donrey, Defendant: Mr. James M. Dunn,
    Warner, Smith & Harris, Fort Smith, AR. For Thomson Newspapers,
    Defendant: William J. Butt, Timothy E. Howell, Davis, Cox & Wright,
    Fayetteville, AR. Mr. Jeremy Epstein, Shearman & Sterling, New York, NY.
    
    JUDGES: H. Franklin Waters, United States District Judge
    
    OPINIONBY: H. Franklin Waters
    
    OPINION: MEMORANDUM OPINION
    
    This is a consolidated antitrust case in which the United States and
    private plaintiffs are challenging the purchase of a local daily
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • COMMUNITY PUBLISHERS, INC.;
  • DONREY CORP. d/b/a DONREY MEDIA GROUP;
  • THE NORTHWEST ARKANSAS TIMES,
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
  • NAT, L.C. and D.R. PARTNERS d/b/a DONREY MEDIA GROUP,
  • Mr. Tom Burke, Burke & Eldridge, Fayetteville, AR.
  • U.S. Attorney, Fort Smith, AR.
  • For Thomson Newspapers, Defendant: William J. Butt, Timothy E. Howell, Davis, Cox & Wright,
  • This is a consolidated antitrust case in which the United States and private plaintiffs are
  • newspaper, the Northwest Arkansas Times, by NAT, L.C. Both the government and private
  • Private plaintiffs and the government both claim that the acquisition violates Section 1 of
  • As will be explained below, the court will find that the challenged acquisition violates
  • Thomson Newspapers, Inc. owned the Northwest Arkansas Times, a local daily newspaper that
  • n1 Various Stephens family trusts own ninety-five percent of NAT's stock, and Jack Stephens
  • Stephens family assets are now dispersed among Jack Stephens, his son, his brother Witt
  • Partners d/b/a Donrey Media Group is a general partnership which owns the Morning News of
  • which competes in the same local daily newspaper market as the Times.
  • Community Publishers, Inc publishes the Benton County Daily Record, which also competes in
  • The acquisition history is also useful in explaining the role of Thomson in closing the deal
  • the Hart-Scott-Rodino notice provisions of the antitrust law were not an infrequent topic of
  • Section 7 forbids a stock or asset acquisition if it may substantially lessen competition in
  • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - n6 In setting forth the
  • This market is in fact two markets: one for readers and one for advertisers.
  • 872, 97 L. Ed. 1277, "every newspaper is a dual trader in separate though interdependent
  • It is generally considered that "Northwest Arkansas" encompasses Washington and Benton
  •    |