LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v ROBIN RUSHING and HAROLD (B.J.) GALLISON, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 85, Defendant: Robin Rushing And Harold (B.J.) Gallison, Jr.; Burton S. Kolko, Administrative Law Judge File No. 3-8593, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>85, Respondents, Securities, Commission, Exchange Act, Rushing, Burnett, Astro, Gallison, Pursuant, Thereunder, Financial Statements, Annual Report, United States, Sanctions, Trading Suspension, Administrative Proceeding, Quotations, Subsection, Reasonable Basis, Robin Rushing, Violation, Broker-dealer, Enforcement, Registration Statement, Reporting Company, Requirements Set, Market-making, Diligence Fee, Respondents Argue, Believing , ContentID: 120245697

Case Documents
1 1996-01-26 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112436
18 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 18 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
COMMISSION
EXCHANGE ACT
RUSHING
BURNETT
ASTRO
GALLISON
PURSUANT
THEREUNDER
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ANNUAL REPORT
UNITED STATES
SANCTIONS
TRADING SUSPENSION
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
QUOTATIONS
SUBSECTION
REASONABLE BASIS
ROBIN RUSHING
VIOLATION
BROKER-DEALER
ENFORCEMENT
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
REPORTING COMPANY
REQUIREMENTS SET
MARKET-MAKING
DILIGENCE FEE
RESPONDENTS ARGUE
BELIEVING





                         INITIAL DECISION RELEASE NO. 85

                         ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
                         FILE NO. 3-8593



                     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                           Before the
                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION




                              :
In the Matter of              :
                              :
ROBIN RUSHING and HAROLD      :    INITIAL DECISION
("B.J.") GALLISON, JR.        :    January 26, 1996
                              :
                              :









APPEARANCES:   Carl A. Tibbets for the Division of Enforcement,
               Securities and Exchange Commission

               Irving M. Einhorn, Attorney for the Respondents

BEFORE:        Burton S. Kolko, Administrative Law Judge







SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • ROBIN RUSHING and HAROLD: INITIAL DECISION
  • Carl A. Tibbets for the Division of Enforcement,
  • Irving M. Einhorn, Attorney for the Respondents
  • This administrative proceeding was instituted pursuant to
  • Sections 15and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  • and Harold Gallison, Jr.
  • Section 15of the Exchange Act and Rule 15c2-11 thereunder,
  • During 1990, Respondents were employed by Burnett, a brokerdealer registered with the
  • supervised Rushing's market-making activities.
  • Rushing made a market in the securities of Astro
  • registration statement in January 1990.
  • In its Trading Suspension Order,
  • quotations in Astro's securities.
  • Rushing knew that she needed an audited annual report before
  • report on Astro's financial statements.
  • Respondents received Astro's due diligence fee on or about
  • Astro was an Exchange Act reporting company.
  • and caused Burnett's violation of Section 15of the
  • the broker or dealer has a reasonable basis for believing that the issuer is current in
  • The Respondents argue that Astro was current in its filings
  • The Division argues that a broker-dealer must meet the
  • requirements of subsection 3 or subsection 5 of Rule 15c2-11.
  • Respondents did not meet the requirements set out in Rule 15c211when they resumed making a
  • Commission has stated that, "Sanctions cannot be assessed
  •    |