SEC v WILLIAM EDWIN SOMDAHL; BRENDA P. MURRAY, et al


\|

Keywords & Phrases

CaseNo: 93, Defendant: William Edwin Somdahl; Brenda P. Murray, Chief Administrative Law Judge File No. 3-8698, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>93, Securities, Somdahl, Fors, Act, Commission, Exchange Act, Div, Laws, Proceeding, Findings, United States, Pursuant, Respondent, Arizona, James, Stock, William Edwin Somdahl, District Court, Enforcement, Witnesses, Violations, Injunction, Evidence, Tjosvold, Appearances, Oliver Washburn, Dennis Patrick, Exhibits, Proposed Findings, Handwritten Letter , ContentID: 120245689

Case Documents

1996-07-22

SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below ] ItemID: 112428

21 pages
TXT

Total Documents: 1 document , 21 pages

Price: $ 19.95

IVESLCD01 KGI0001

1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS

SOMDAHL
FORS
ACT
COMMISSION
EXCHANGE ACT
DIV
LAWS
PROCEEDING
FINDINGS
UNITED STATES
PURSUANT
RESPONDENT
ARIZONA
JAMES
STOCK
WILLIAM EDWIN SOMDAHL
DISTRICT COURT
ENFORCEMENT
WITNESSES
VIOLATIONS
INJUNCTION
EVIDENCE
TJOSVOLD
APPEARANCES
OLIVER WASHBURN
DENNIS PATRICK
EXHIBITS
PROPOSED FINDINGS
HANDWRITTEN LETTER

==========================================START OF PAGE 1======


                              INITIAL DECISION RELEASE NO. 93

                              ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
                              FILE NO. 3-8698




                     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            Before the
                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION



____________________________

In the Matter of              :
                              :
WILLIAM EDWIN SOMDAHL         :    INITIAL DECISION
                              :    July 22, 1996
____________________________










APPEARANCES:   Thomas M. Melton and Brent R. Baker, Division of
               Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission

               William Edwin Somdahl, pro se


BEFORE:        Brenda P. Murray, Chief Administrative Law Judge





     The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission")

SNIPPETS:

APPEARANCES: Thomas M. Melton and Brent R. Baker,

Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission

instituted this proceeding on May 18, 1995, pursuant to Sections

15and 19of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange

Arizona, on July 24, 1995.

called four witnesses: William Edwin Somdahl, James

The Respondent appeared pro se.

himself and Dennis Patrick, and did not offer any exhibits.

On September 5, 1995, the Division filed Proposed Findings

Respondent's Brief is a one-page handwritten letter dated October

1References to the exhibits are to Div.

court enjoined the Respondent from further violations of these

provisions of the securities laws and rule.

SEC v. Fors, Civil

Order and Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction Against William

Evidence other than Mr. Somdahl's recollection indicates that he also held a license as a

5CenPac Securities in Phoenix, AZ; Heiner & Stock in Minneapolis, MN; Robert S.E. Peterson

I have considered all proposed findings and conclusions and all contentions, and I accept