LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v DANNY G. PINKERTON and KEVIN N. CAMPBELL; BRENDA P. MURRAY, CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE FI Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 98, Defendant: Danny G. Pinkerton and Kevin N. Campbell; Brenda P. Murray, Chief Administrative Law Judge File No. 3-8805, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>98, Campbell, Securities, Securities Act, Commission, Bfl, Denver, Exchange Act, Respondent Campbell, Steele, Sales, Registered Representatives, Pursuant, Offering, Customers, Div, Private Placement, Pinkerton, Investors, Proceeding, Denver Office, United States, Witnesses, Registration Statement, Recommendation, Violations, Placement Memorandum, Enforcement, Order Instituting Proceedings, Broker-dealer, Sales Manager , ContentID: 120245684

Case Documents
1 1996-10-18 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112423
36 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 36 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
SECURITIES ACT
COMMISSION
BFL
DENVER
EXCHANGE ACT
RESPONDENT CAMPBELL
STEELE
SALES
REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES
PURSUANT
OFFERING
CUSTOMERS
DIV
PRIVATE PLACEMENT
PINKERTON
INVESTORS
PROCEEDING
DENVER OFFICE
UNITED STATES
WITNESSES
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
RECOMMENDATION
VIOLATIONS
PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM
ENFORCEMENT
ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS
BROKER-DEALER
SALES MANAGER
==========================================START OF PAGE 1======



                              INITIAL DECISION RELEASE NO. 98

                              ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
                              FILE NO. 3-8805




                     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            Before the
                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


_________________________

In the Matter of         :
                         :
DANNY G. PINKERTON and   :         INITIAL DECISION
KEVIN N. CAMPBELL        :         October 18, 1996
                         :
__________________________









APPEARANCES:   Robert M. Fusfeld, Leslie J. Hendrickson, and
               Michael R. MacPhail for the Division of
               Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission

               R. Parker Semler for Kevin N. Campbell


BEFORE:        Brenda P. Murray, Chief Administrative Law Judge






SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  • Enforcement, Securities and Exchange Commission
  • instituted this proceeding on September 11, 1995, pursuant to
  • Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
  • The Order Instituting Proceedings
  • September 1993, Mr. Campbell willfully violated Sections 5,
  • Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
  • I held hearings in Denver, Colorado, on November 28 through
  • presented nine witnesses and introduced twenty-seven exhibits.
  • introduced five exhibits.--The Division and Respondent Campbell submitted Proposed
  • ---------FOOTNOTES------------ I will refer to the exhibits as Div.
  • Mr. Pinkerton appeared pro se at the hearing and presented one witness.
  • that information to other brokers and investors,
  • trading of BFL stock on the NASDAQ and the prices at which BFL
  • Campbell is found to have committed these violations,
  • ---------FOOTNOTES------------ On September 28, 1995, the Commission filed a complaint in ates.
  • registered representative with a broker-dealer.
  • Tamaron's most successful sales persons with over three hundred
  • new Denver office of Rockefeller, Rothschild and Steele,
  • period Mr. Campbell functioned as sales manager.
  • Registered representatives were told to refer
  • I take official notice of the fact that the Commission's records indicate that BFL filed a
  • BFL's private placement memorandum dated February 1, 1993,
  • the placement agent for the offering.
  • and that "I told [customers] exactly what I was being
  • By his recommendation he implies that a reasonable investigation has been made and that his
  • Mr. Campbell discussed this proceeding with two people after
  •    |