LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v PETER W. ZENT and MICHAEL A. CORNBLUM Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-41976, Defendant: Peter W. Zent and Michael A. Cornblum, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-41976, Escrow, City, Kidder, Agreement, Cornblum, Reinvestment Agreement, Securities, Bonds, Proceeds, Commission, Exchange, Representation, Mgia, Bid, Yield, Kirschner, Zent, Fair Market, Investment, Amount, Exchange Act, Payment, Float Periods, Bidder, Respondent, Pursuant, Tax-exempt Bonds, Relevant Times, Irc Arbitrage Provisions, Underlying Tax-exempt Bonds , ContentID: 120245643

Case Documents
1 1999-10-05 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112382
8 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 8 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CITY
KIDDER
AGREEMENT
CORNBLUM
REINVESTMENT AGREEMENT
SECURITIES
BONDS
PROCEEDS
COMMISSION
EXCHANGE
REPRESENTATION
MGIA
BID
YIELD
KIRSCHNER
ZENT
FAIR MARKET
INVESTMENT
AMOUNT
EXCHANGE ACT
PAYMENT
FLOAT PERIODS
BIDDER
RESPONDENT
PURSUANT
TAX-EXEMPT BONDS
RELEVANT TIMES
IRC ARBITRAGE PROVISIONS
UNDERLYING TAX-EXEMPT BONDS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 41976 / October 5, 1999

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
   FILE NO. 3-9858

   ________________________________
                                    ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND
   In the Matter of                 IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
                                    AGAINST MICHAEL A. CORNBLUM
   PETER W. ZENT AND MICHAEL A.
   CORNBLUM
   Respondents.
   ________________________________

   I.

   On March 30, 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission
   ("Commission") instituted cease-and-desist and public administrative
   proceedings pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities
   Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against respondent Michael A.
   Cornblum ("Cornblum" or "Respondent") to determine whether he
   willfully violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
   thereunder and, if so, what remedial sanctions, if any, were
   appropriate.

   In response to the institution of these proceedings, Cornblum has
   submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer"), which the Commission has
   determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and
   any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission or in
   which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the
   findings herein, except as to the jurisdiction of the Commission over
   him and the subject matter of the proceeding, which are admitted,
   Cornblum consents to the entry of the findings and remedial sanctions
   set forth below.

   II.

   On the basis of this Order and the Offer, the Commission makes the
   following findings

   A. Nature of Proceeding

   This matter involves material misrepresentations by Kidder, Peabody &
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • PETER W. ZENT AND MICHAEL A. CORNBLUM
  • On March 30, 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission instituted cease-and-desist and
  • This matter involves material misrepresentations by Kidder, Peabody & Co., Incorporated,
  • Kidder's purchase of the Agreement at less than fair market value had the effect of
  • In addition, to being a registered representative of MGIA, Cornblum was at all relevant times
  • MGIA was at all relevant times a San Francisco, California, based broker-dealer registered
  • Peter W. Zent was at all relevant times a registered representative of Kidder with the title
  • In April 1991, the City issued its tax-exempt $138,610,000 Utilities Tax and Special Revenue
  • The Series 1991 Bonds were advance refunding bonds, meaning that the City intended to use the
  • Because the previously-issued bonds were not then due and payable, the City set up an escrow
  • Pursuant to certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, a municipal issuer of tax-exempt
  • As a result, an opportunity existed for the City to earn additional investment income if the
  • Under the proposal, Kidder would make an initial cash payment to the City, and Kidder would
  • the City agreed to enter into an Escrow Reinvestment Agreement.
  • applicable IRC arbitrage provisions then in effect required that any payment to the City
  • The safe harbor rule required, among other things, that an issuer of tax-exempt bonds obtain
  • As part of this effort, Cornblum provided at least one bidder with false information that
  • G. Material Misrepresentations In The Representation Letter
  •    |