LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v LAWRENCE CAITO Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-42181, Defendant: Lawrence Caito, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-42181, Caito, Securities, Commission, Stocks, Exchange, Prices, Market, Exchange Act, District, Pursuant, District Court, Capital Shares, Broker-dealer, Haas, Arrangement, Violations, United States, Order Instituting Proceedings, Industries, Manipulate, Bid, Purchasing, Tires, Cliff Engle, Digital Metcom, Fountain Powerboat, Nasdaq, Complaint, Scheme, Stabilize , ContentID: 120245598

Case Documents
1 1999-11-29 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112337
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
COMMISSION
STOCKS
EXCHANGE
PRICES
MARKET
EXCHANGE ACT
DISTRICT
PURSUANT
DISTRICT COURT
CAPITAL SHARES
BROKER-DEALER
HAAS
ARRANGEMENT
VIOLATIONS
UNITED STATES
ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS
INDUSTRIES
MANIPULATE
BID
PURCHASING
TIRES
CLIFF ENGLE
DIGITAL METCOM
FOUNTAIN POWERBOAT
NASDAQ
COMPLAINT
SCHEME
STABILIZE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 42181 / November 29, 1999

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-9654
   ____________________________________
   In the Matter of                     ORDER MAKING
                                        FINDINGS AND
   LAWRENCE CAITO                       IMPOSING SANCTIONS
   Respondent
   ____________________________________

                                     I.

                       ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS

   On July 23, 1998, the Securities and Exchange Commission deemed it
   appropriate and in the public interest to institute public
   administrative proceedings against the Respondent, Lawrence Caito
   ("Caito"), pursuant to Section 15(b) and 19(h) of the Securities
   Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act").

                                    II.

                                 FINDINGS

   Caito has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer") to the
   Commission, which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for
   the purpose of this proceedings and any other proceeding brought by,
   or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party,
   and without admitting or denying the findings contained herein, except
   as to jurisdiction and the entry of the injunction issued by the
   United States

   District Court, Southern District of New York, to which he admits,
   Caito has consented to the issuance of this Order Making Findings and
   Imposing Sanctions ("Order").

   On the basis of the Order Instituting Proceedings and Caito's Offer of
   Settlement, the Commission finds that

   A. From 1973 through May 1995, Caito was the sole shareholder,
   president, head trader, and person associated with Capital Shares, a
   broker-dealer registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 15(b)
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS
  • On July 23, 1998, the Securities and Exchange Commission deemed it appropriate and in the
  • Caito has submitted an Offer of Settlement to the Commission, which the Commission has
  • Solely for the purpose of this proceedings and any other proceeding brought by, or on behalf
  • District Court, Southern District of New York, to which he admits, Caito has consented to the
  • Capital Shares was a market maker in the securities of Big O Tires, Inc., Cliff Engle, Ltd.,
  • During the relevant time periods, the stock of all these companies were traded on the NASDAQ,
  • The Commission filed a Complaint on November 20, 1990, alleging that from July through
  • More specifically, the Commission's Complaint alleged that Caito participated in the ranteed profit arrangement with another broker-dealer without disclosing to the NASDAQ system the
  • The Court ordered Caito to pay disgorgement and enjoined Caito from committing future
  • More specifically, the district court found that an undisclosed agreement existed between
  • Haas then acted as the "buyer of last resort" at the end of the trading day when Caito and
  •    |