UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 42181 / November 29, 1999
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-9654
____________________________________
In the Matter of ORDER MAKING
FINDINGS AND
LAWRENCE CAITO IMPOSING SANCTIONS
Respondent
____________________________________
I.
ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS
On July 23, 1998, the Securities and Exchange Commission deemed it
appropriate and in the public interest to institute public
administrative proceedings against the Respondent, Lawrence Caito
("Caito"), pursuant to Section 15(b) and 19(h) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act").
II.
FINDINGS
Caito has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer") to the
Commission, which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for
the purpose of this proceedings and any other proceeding brought by,
or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party,
and without admitting or denying the findings contained herein, except
as to jurisdiction and the entry of the injunction issued by the
United States
District Court, Southern District of New York, to which he admits,
Caito has consented to the issuance of this Order Making Findings and
Imposing Sanctions ("Order").
On the basis of the Order Instituting Proceedings and Caito's Offer of
Settlement, the Commission finds that
A. From 1973 through May 1995, Caito was the sole shareholder,
president, head trader, and person associated with Capital Shares, a
broker-dealer registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 15(b)
SNIPPETS:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS
On July 23, 1998, the Securities and Exchange Commission deemed it appropriate and in the
Caito has submitted an Offer of Settlement to the Commission, which the Commission has
Solely for the purpose of this proceedings and any other proceeding brought by, or on behalf
District Court, Southern District of New York, to which he admits, Caito has consented to the
Capital Shares was a market maker in the securities of Big O Tires, Inc., Cliff Engle, Ltd.,
During the relevant time periods, the stock of all these companies were traded on the NASDAQ,
The Commission filed a Complaint on November 20, 1990, alleging that from July through
More specifically, the Commission's Complaint alleged that Caito participated in the
ranteed profit arrangement with another broker-dealer without disclosing to the NASDAQ system the
The Court ordered Caito to pay disgorgement and enjoined Caito from committing future
More specifically, the district court found that an undisclosed agreement existed between
Haas then acted as the "buyer of last resort" at the end of the trading day when Caito and
|