LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v RONALD A. KNITTLE and GREGORY G. VERNON Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-42211, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO FROM, AMONG OTHER THINGS, IN, Defendant: Ronald A. Knittle and Gregory G. Vernon, Plaintiff: SEC, State: CO Colorado, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-42211, Securities, Exchange Act, Commission, Penny Stock, Pursuant, Knittle, Vernon, District, Purchase, Sale, United States, Purposes, Violating, Securities Laws, Participating, Offering, Trading, Inducing, Induce, Administrative Proceeding, Settlement, Findings, Sanctions, States District Court, Colorado, Connection, Provisions, Thereunder, Civil Action, Colo , ContentID: 120245591

Case Documents
1 1999-12-09 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112330
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
EXCHANGE ACT
COMMISSION
PENNY STOCK
PURSUANT
KNITTLE
VERNON
DISTRICT
PURCHASE
SALE
UNITED STATES
PURPOSES
VIOLATING
SECURITIES LAWS
PARTICIPATING
OFFERING
TRADING
INDUCING
INDUCE
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
SETTLEMENT
FINDINGS
SANCTIONS
STATES DISTRICT COURT
COLORADO
CONNECTION
PROVISIONS
THEREUNDER
CIVIL ACTION
COLO
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 42211 / December 9, 1999

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-10056

   I.

   In these proceedings ordered pursuant to Section 15(b)(6)(A) of the
   Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), Respondents Ronald
   A. Knittle ("Knittle") and Gregory G. Vernon ("Vernon") have submitted
   Offers of Settlement ("Offers") which the Securities and Exchange
   Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these
   proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
   Commission or in which the Commission is a party, Knittle and Vernon
   consent to the entry of this Order of the Commission Making Findings
   and Imposing Remedial Sanctions Pursuant to Section 15(b)(6)(A) of the
   Securities Exchange Act of 1934, without admitting or denying the
   findings of this Order, except that they admit the jurisdiction of the
   Commission with respect to the matters set forth in this Order, and
   that they were enjoined from various violations of the securities laws
   as set forth in this Order.

   II.

   On the basis of Knittle's and Vernon's Offers, the Commission finds
   that

   1) On July 16, 1999, Vernon was enjoined by the United States District
   Court for the District of Colorado from, among other things, in
   connection with the purchase or sale of securities, violating various
   provisions of the securities laws, namely, Sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a),
   and 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and Section
   10(b)of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5, thereunder. (SEC v. Golden
   Eagle International, Inc., et. al., Civil Action No. 98-Z-1020,
   U.S.D.C. Colo.)

   2) On September 21, 1999 Knittle was enjoined by the United States
   District Court for the District of Colorado from, among other things,
   in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, violating
   various provisions of the securities laws, namely, Sections 5(a),
   5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Sections 10(b), 13(a),
   13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B)(ii), and 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rules
   10b-5, 13a-1, 13a-11, 13a-13, 12b-20, and 13d-1 thereunder. (SEC v.
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
  • In these proceedings ordered pursuant to Section 15of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  • Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf Order, and that they were enjoined from various violations of the securities laws as set forth in
  • On July 16, 1999, Vernon was enjoined by the United States District Court for the District of
  • (SEC v. Golden Eagle International, Inc., et. al., Civil Action No. 98-Z-1020,
  • Colo.)
  • At the time of the conduct for which they were enjoined, Knittle and Vernon were
  • the Commission finds that it is in the public interest to impose the sanctions specified in
  • Knittle be, pursuant to Section 15of the Exchange Act, barred from participating in an
  •    |