LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v ROBERT A. SCHATZ Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-42278, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: AGAINST RESPONDENT BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE, Defendant: Robert A. Schatz, Plaintiff: SEC, State: NY New York, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-42278, Act, Commission, Securities Act, Exchange Act, Respondent, Findings, Permanent, District, United States, Pursuant, Settlement, Making Findings, Commission Deems, Hereby, Robert, Schatz, Remedial Sanctions, Permanent Injunction, States District Court, Southern District, York, Enjoining Respondent, Future Violations, Promulgated Thereunder, Purpose, Admitting, Broker-dealer, Judgement, Civil Action, Swk , ContentID: 120245575

Case Documents
1 1999-12-27 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112314
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
SECURITIES ACT
EXCHANGE ACT
RESPONDENT
FINDINGS
PERMANENT
DISTRICT
UNITED STATES
PURSUANT
SETTLEMENT
MAKING FINDINGS
COMMISSION DEEMS
HEREBY
ROBERT
SCHATZ
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
YORK
ENJOINING RESPONDENT
FUTURE VIOLATIONS
PROMULGATED THEREUNDER
PURPOSE
ADMITTING
BROKER-DEALER
JUDGEMENT
CIVIL ACTION
SWK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   Securities Exchange Act of 1934
   Release No. 42278 / December 27, 1999

   Administrative Proceeding
   File No. 3-10126

   ________________________
   In the Matter of         Order Instituting Public
                            Proceedings, Making Findings
   ROBERT A. SCHATZ,        and Imposing Remedial Sanctions
                            Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the
   Respondent.              Securities Exchange Act of 1934
   ________________________

   I.

   The Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest that
   proceedings pursuant to Section 15(b)(6) of the Securities Exchange
   Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") be, and they hereby are, instituted
   against Robert A. Schatz ("Respondent") to determine whether remedial
   sanctions are necessary in light of the permanent injunction entered
   against Respondent by the United States District Court for the
   Southern District of New York on December 14, 1999, permanently
   restraining and enjoining Respondent from future violations of Section
   10(b) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)) and Rule 10b-5
   promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5), Section 17(a) of the
   Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") (15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)), and
   Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(a) and
   77e(c)).

   In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent
   has submitted an Offer of Settlement for the purpose of disposing of
   the issues raised by these proceedings. The Commission has determined
   to accept Respondent's Offer of Settlement.

   Solely for the purposes of this proceeding and any other proceedings
   brought by or on behalf of the Commission or in which the Commission
   is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings, except as
   to jurisdiction and as to paragraphs II.A and II.B below, which are
   admitted, Respondent consents to the issuance of this Order
   Instituting Public Proceedings, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial
   Sanctions Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act (the "Order").

   II. Findings and Conclusions
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  • Pursuant to Section 15of the
  • The Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest that proceedings pursuant to iolations of Section 10of the Exchange Act ) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, Section 17of
  • In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer of
  • Solely for the purposes of this proceeding and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf
  • a Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction was entered by the United States District Court for
  • the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to accept the Offer of
  • Accordingly, it is ordered that Respondent be, and he hereby is, barred from association with
  •    |