LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v DANIEL L. KOEHLER Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-41764, Defendant: Daniel L. Koehler, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-41764, Koehler, Commission, Securities, Omni, Exchange Act, Dealer, Pursuant, Broker, Complaint, United States, Administrative Proceeding, Matter, Order Making Findings, Sanctions, Settlement, Omni International Trading, Sale, Tender, Hereby, Daniel, Respondent, Facts, Order Instituting, Induce, District, Enjoining Koehler, Violating, Promulgated Thereunder, Defrauded Public Investors , ContentID: 120245327

Case Documents
1 1999-08-19 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112066
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
SECURITIES
OMNI
EXCHANGE ACT
DEALER
PURSUANT
BROKER
COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
MATTER
ORDER MAKING FINDINGS
SANCTIONS
SETTLEMENT
OMNI INTERNATIONAL TRADING
SALE
TENDER
HEREBY
DANIEL
RESPONDENT
FACTS
ORDER INSTITUTING
INDUCE
DISTRICT
DEFENDANTS
ENJOINING KOEHLER
VIOLATING
PROMULGATED THEREUNDER
DEFRAUDED PUBLIC INVESTORS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   RELEASE NO. 41764 / August 19, 1999

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   FILE NO. 3-9849

   In the Matter of

   DANIEL L. KOEHLER,
   Respondent.
   ORDER MAKING FINDINGS
   AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL
   SANCTIONS

   I.

   In this public administrative proceeding ordered pursuant to Section
   15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), Daniel
   L. Koehler ("Koehler") has submitted an Offer of Settlement, which the
   Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these
   proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
   Commission or in which the Commission is a party, and without
   admitting or denying the findings contained in this Order Making
   Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions ("Order"), except for the
   Commission's jurisdiction with respect to the matters set forth in
   this Order and those facts which are set forth in paragraphs II.1. and
   II.2. below, which he admits, Koehler consents to the entry of this
   Order.

   II.

   On the basis of this Order, the Order Instituting Public
   Administrative Proceedings in this matter and the Offer of Settlement
   submitted by Koehler, the Commission finds that

   1. From in or about April 1992 through in or about March 1993, Koehler
   was not registered as a broker or dealer with the Commission pursuant
   to the Exchange Act. However, from in or about April 1992 to in or
   about March 1993, Koehler used Omni International Trading, Inc.
   ("Omni") to effect transactions in, or induce or attempt to induce the
   purchase or sale of, certain Omni securities, at a time when Koehler
   was not registered with the Commission as a broker or dealer.

   2. On December 4, 1998, in the case of SEC v. Omni International
SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • In this public administrative proceeding ordered pursuant to Section 15of the Securities
  • Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf
  • On the basis of this Order, the Order Instituting Public Administrative Proceedings in this
  • From in or about April 1992 through in or about March 1993, Koehler was not registered as a
  • However, from in or about April 1992 to in or about March 1993, Koehler used Omni
  • 2116), the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, entered an Order of
  • The Complaint was based on the conduct alleged below.
  • From in or about January 1991 through in or about February 1995, Omni and the other
  • As part of that fraud, the Complaint alleged that from in or about April 1992 through in or er, the expected profit to be made on the tender offer and the commissions to be earned.
  • Respondent Koehler be, and hereby is, barred from association with any broker or dealer.
  • The Order Instituting Proceedings in this matter was issued on March
  •    |