LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v DAVID A. JOHNSTON Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-41841, Defendant: David A. Johnston, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-41841, Johnston, Securities, Act, Ctb, Commission, Exchange Act, Sale, Investors, Randy, Pursuant, Paragraphs, Broker, Material Facts, Cds, Instituting, Findings, Edison Worldwide, Hereby, Dealer, Induce, Bank Licensing, Sell, Commerce, David, Making Findings, Remedial Sanctions Pursuant, Effect Transactions, Purchase , ContentID: 120245312

Case Documents
1 1999-09-08 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112051
4 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
ACT
CTB
COMMISSION
EXCHANGE ACT
SALE
INVESTORS
RANDY
PURSUANT
PARAGRAPHS
BROKER
MATERIAL FACTS
CDS
INSTITUTING
FINDINGS
EDISON WORLDWIDE
HEREBY
DEALER
INDUCE
BANK LICENSING
COURT
BUSINESS
SELL
COMMERCE
DAVID
MAKING FINDINGS
REMEDIAL SANCTIONS PURSUANT
EFFECT TRANSACTIONS
PURCHASE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   RELEASE NO. 41841 / September 8, 1999
   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   FILE NO. 3-10003

   In the Matter of

   David A. Johnston,
   Respondent.
   ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS,
   MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING
   REMEDIAL SANCTIONS PURSUANT
   TO SECTIONS 15(b) and 19(h) OF THE
   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

   I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
   appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative
   proceedings be instituted against David A. Johnston ("Johnston")
   pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of
   1934 ("Exchange Act").

   II.

   In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Johnston has
   submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer") which the Commission has
   determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and
   any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to
   which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the
   Commission's findings contained herein, except the Commission's
   findings set forth in Paragraphs III.A. and C., which are admitted,
   Johnston consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Proceedings,
   Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions pursuant to Sections
   15(b) and 19(h) of the Exchange Act ("Order").

   Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that proceedings pursuant to
   Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Exchange Act be and hereby are
   instituted.

   III.

   On the basis of this Order and Johnston's Offer, the Commission finds
   that

SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • David A. Johnston, Respondent.
  • MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS PURSUANT
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest that
  • Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf
  • and C., which are admitted, Johnston consents to the entry of this Order Instituting
  • IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that proceedings pursuant to Sections 15and 19of the Exchange Act be and
  • During all relevant times, Johnston used Edison Worldwide Capital to effect transactions in,
  • From at least September 1990 to December 1992, Michael J. Randy offered and sold over $16
  • Randy represented that CTB was a bank licensed in Montserrat and later Grenada.
  • Randy offered CTB CDs to investors through a nationwide sales network,
  • Instead, Randy operated CTB from his residence and offices in Illinois as a classic Ponzi
  • Johnston and his Edison Worldwide sales agents, without conducting an adequate investigation
  • As part of that offer and sale, Johnston provided investors with promotional materials
  • Johnston continued to offer and sell CTB CDs despite warnings from Florida's state agency
  • the Court found that Johnston violated the antifraud provisions of the federal securities
  • through III.G., Johnston, directly or indirectly, made use of any means or instruments of
  •    |