LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v KAREN MICHALSKI and CHRISTOPHER D. SARGENT Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IA-1822, Defendant: Karen Michalski and Christopher D. Sargent, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>IA-1822, Advisers, Broker, Commission, Shawmut Advisers, Clients, Michalski, Sargent, Securities, Advisers Act, Fixed-income, Transactions, Investment Adviser, Trades, Michigan Broker, Exchange Commission, Price, Money Order, Respondents, Pursuant, Findings, Boston, Salesman, Violation, United States, Instituting, Settlement, Accordance, Massachusetts, Fixed-income Trader, Pension Plan , ContentID: 120245310

Case Documents
1 1999-09-09 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112049
5 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 5 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
BROKER
COMMISSION
SHAWMUT ADVISERS
CLIENTS
MICHALSKI
SARGENT
SECURITIES
ADVISERS ACT
FIXED-INCOME
TRANSACTIONS
INVESTMENT ADVISER
TRADES
MICHIGAN BROKER
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
PRICE
MONEY ORDER
RESPONDENTS
PURSUANT
FINDINGS
BOSTON
SALESMAN
VIOLATION
UNITED STATES
INSTITUTING
SETTLEMENT
ACCORDANCE
MASSACHUSETTS
FIXED-INCOME TRADER
PENSION PLAN
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before The
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
   RELEASE NO. 1822 / September 9, 1999

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-10006
   In the Matter of
   KAREN MICHALSKI and
   CHRISTOPHER D. SARGENT,
   Respondents. ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC PROCEEDDINGS PURSUANT TO
   SECTIONS 203(f) ADVISERS ACT OF 1940, MAKING SANCTIONS, AND
   CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER

   I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate and in the
   public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist
   proceedings be instituted pursuant to Sections 203(f) and 203(k) of
   the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ("Advisers Act") against
   Respondents Karen Michalski ("Michalski") and Christopher D. Sargent
   ("Sargent").

   II.

   In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Michalski and
   Sargent have each submitted an Offer of Settlement that the Commission
   has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings
   and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission or
   in which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying
   the findings, except those findings pertaining to the jurisdiction of
   the Commission over them and the subject matter of these proceedings,
   which they admit, Michalski and Sargent, by their Offers of
   Settlement, consent to the entry of the findings and the imposition of
   the remedial sanctions and cease-and-desist order set forth herein.

   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that proceedings pursuant to Sections
   203(f) and 203(k) of the Advisers Act be, and hereby are, instituted.

   III.

   On the basis of this Order Instituting Proceedings Pursuant to
   Sections 203(f) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940,
   Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions, and Cease-and-Desist
   Order ("Order") and the Offers of Settlement submitted by Michalski
   and Sargent, the Commission makes the following findings
SNIPPETS:
  • INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
  • ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC PROCEEDDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 203ADVISERS ACT OF 1940, MAKING
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest that
  • In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Michalski and Sargent have each
  • Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf esist order set forth herein.
  • On the basis of this Order Instituting Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 203and 203of the
  • Michalski, a resident of Quincy, Massachusetts, was at all relevant times employed as a
  • Sargent, a resident of Boston, Massachusetts, was at all relevant times employed as a
  • This proceeding arises from Shawmut Advisers' undisclosed use of approximately $1.9 million
  • Shawmut Advisers represented to its clients that it directed brokerage commissions to brokers
  • certain brokers were selected by a Shawmut Advisers salesman on the basis of their ability to
  • Michalski and Sargent altered several trade tickets in order to conceal that they did not
  • The Salesman and the registered representative agreed that for every one million dollars of
  • However, because the Michigan Broker had no facilities for executing or clearing securities
  • Michalski and Sargent were responsible for directing trades in accordance with Shawmut
  • Sections 206and of the Advisers Act prohibit an investment adviser from employing any device,
  • Michalski cease and desist from committing or causing any violation and any future violation
  • Michalski shall, within sixty days of the entry of this Order, pay a civil money penalty in
  •    |