LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v ENGEBRETSON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IA-1825, Defendant: Engebretson Capital Management, Inc. and Lester W. Engebretson, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>IA-1825, Ecmi, Engebretson, Accountant, Advisers Act, Clients, Commission, Investment, Pro, Violations, Proceeding, Practices, Audit, Pursuant, Policies, Directors, Report, Prospective Clients, Engagement, Securities, Compliance, Management, Respondents, Materials, Model Account, Cash, Standards, Solicitors, Mails, Scope, Recommendations , ContentID: 120245306

Case Documents
1 1999-09-13 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112045
7 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 7 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ENGEBRETSON
ACCOUNTANT
ADVISERS ACT
CLIENTS
COMMISSION
INVESTMENT
PRO
VIOLATIONS
PROCEEDING
PRACTICES
AUDIT
PURSUANT
POLICIES
DIRECTORS
REPORT
PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS
ENGAGEMENT
SECURITIES
COMPLIANCE
MANAGEMENT
RESPONDENTS
MATERIALS
MODEL ACCOUNT
CASH
STANDARDS
SOLICITORS
MAILS
SCOPE
RECOMMENDATIONS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
   Release No. 1825 / September 13, 1999

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-10010
   In the Matter of
   Engebretson Capital Management, Inc.
   and Lester W. Engebretson,
   Respondents. ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE AND
   CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 203(e), 203(f) AND
   203(k) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940, MAKING FINDINGS AND
   IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS

   I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") deems it
   appropriate and in the public interest that a public administrative
   and cease-and-desist proceeding be instituted pursuant to Sections
   203(e), 203(f) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the
   "Advisers Act") against Engebretson Capital Management, Inc. ("ECMI")
   and Lester W. Engebretson ("Engebretson").

   In anticipation of the institution of this proceeding, ECMI and
   Engebretson have submitted an Offer of Settlement (the "Offer") which
   the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purposes of
   this proceeding and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of
   the Commission, or in which the Commission is a party, and without
   admitting or denying the findings contained herein, except those
   findings pertaining to the jurisdiction of the Commission over them
   and over the subject matter of this proceeding, ECMI and Engebretson
   consent to the issuance of this Order Instituting Public
   Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceeding Pursuant to Sections
   203(e), 203(f) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940,
   Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions (the "Order").

   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that a proceeding pursuant to Sections
   203(e), 203(f) and 203(k) of the Advisers Act be, and hereby is,
   instituted.

   II.

   On the basis of this Order and the Offer submitted by ECMI and
   Engebretson, the Commission finds that

SNIPPETS:
  • ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
  • File No. 3-10010 In the Matter of Engebretson Capital Management, Inc. and Lester W.
  • ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE AND CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest that a
  • In anticipation of the institution of this proceeding, ECMI and Engebretson have submitted an
  • Engebretson controlled ECMI's operations and was responsible for the firm's compliance with
  • The materials appeared in the form of charts which summarized ECMI's performance history from
  • Moreover, the returns reported by ECMI were not indicative of actual client performance, and
  • Although ECMI began to report actual client performance in 1995, the adviser failed to
  • As a result of these practices, ECMI overstated its annual performance by as many as 15
  • In fact, as noted above, the reported results were based upon composites of client accounts
  • Moreover, ECMI improperly linked actual and model account performance, also in violation of
  • In reality, the accounting firm reviewed, but did not audit, ECMI's model account between
  • The paper published a transcript of the interview in its February 16, 1998 edition, and ECMI
  • During the relevant period, ECMI willfully violated, and Engebretson willfully aided and tive clients.
  • Within thirty days of the effective date of the Order and continuing five years thereafter, violations of the Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act of 1940.
  • For any particular calendar year, ECMI shall, no earlier than three months prior to the
  • Within thirty days of the completion of each audit, ECMI shall arrange for the certified
  • ECMI shall further arrange for the certified public accountant's quarterly reports to be
  • ECMI shall adopt, implement, and maintain all policies, practices and procedures recommended
  • For the period of the engagement and for a period of two years from the completion of the
  •    |