LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v WILLIAM MCNAMARA Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-41885, Defendant: William McNamara, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-41885, Commission, Respondent, Investment, Exchange Act, Securities, Icc, Investment Contracts, Instituting, Broker-dealer, Investor Funds, Administrative Proceedings, William Mcnamara, Pursuant, Hereby, Complaint, Bank Accounts, Pay, Making Findings, Admitting, Entry, Jurisdiction, Paragraph, Injunction, Respondent Consents, District, Violations, Provisions, Sold, Misrepresentations , ContentID: 120245301

Case Documents
1 1999-09-20 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112040
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
RESPONDENT
INVESTMENT
EXCHANGE ACT
SECURITIES
ICC
INVESTMENT CONTRACTS
INSTITUTING
BROKER-DEALER
INVESTOR FUNDS
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
WILLIAM MCNAMARA
PURSUANT
HEREBY
COMPLAINT
BANK ACCOUNTS
PAY
MAKING FINDINGS
ADMITTING
ENTRY
JURISDICTION
PARAGRAPH
INJUNCTION
RESPONDENT CONSENTS
DISTRICT
COURT
VIOLATIONS
PROVISIONS
SOLD
MISREPRESENTATIONS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   Securities Exchange Act of 1934
   Release No. 41885 / September 20, 1999

   Administrative Proceeding
   File No. 3-10016

   In the Matter of

   WILLIAM McNAMARA,
   Respondent.
   ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC
   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
   PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15(b) AND 19(h)
   OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
   ACT OF 1934, MAKING FINDINGS AND
   IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS

   I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate and in the
   public interest that administrative proceedings be instituted against
   William McNamara ("McNamara") ("Respondent") pursuant to Sections
   15(b) and 19(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange
   Act").

   In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent
   has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer") which the Commission
   has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings
   and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of the Commission or
   in which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying
   any of the findings contained herein, except as to the jurisdiction of
   the Commission over him and over the subject matter of these
   proceedings, and the matters set forth in paragraph II. 1. below, and
   the entry of the injunction set forth in paragraph II. 4. below, which
   are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry by the Commission of
   this Order Instituting Public Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to
   Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Exchange Act, Making Findings and
   Imposing Remedial Sanctions ("Order").

   Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that proceedings against Respondent
   be and hereby are instituted.

   II.

SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest that
  • In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer of
  • Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf
  • below, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry by the Commission of this Order
  • IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that proceedings against Respondent be and hereby are instituted.
  • On September 24, 1998, the Commission filed a complaint in the United States District Court
  • Among other things, the Complaint charged Respondent with violations of certain provisions of
  • Respondent and others offered and sold $3.3 million of ICC 2000 investment contracts from at
  • Respondent and others misrepresented to investors i) that ICC 2000 investment contracts were
  • In fact, investor funds were not secure and risk free because investor funds were withdrawn
  • On December 22, 1998, without admitting or denying any of the allegations contained in the
  •    |