![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ACT EXCHANGE ACT CITY PUBLIC CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS ODIO EXCHANGE COMMISSION MIAMI FLORIDA SURANA ALLEGES ANTI-FRAUD PROVISIONS UNITED STATES SECURITIES CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT CESAR ODIO MANOHAR SURANA CONNECTION SALE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE ALLEGATIONS RESPONDENTS |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Release No. 7741 / September 22, 1999
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 41896 / September 22, 1999
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-10022
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission")
has instituted public cease-and-desist proceedings pursuant to Section
8A of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and Section 21C of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against the City
of Miami, Florida (the "City"), and Cesar Odio ("Odio") and Manohar
Surana ("Surana"), both of Miami, Florida (collectively the
"Respondents'), to determine whether a cease-and-desist order should
be imposed against them. The Order Instituting Public Cease-and-Desist
Proceedings ("Order") alleges that the City, through Odio and Surana,
violated the anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Act and Exchange
Act in connection with the offer and sale to the public of securities
in the form of municipal bonds issued by the City in June, August and
December of 1995. The Order also alleges that the City, through Odio,
violated the anti-fraud provisions when it disseminated its
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for fiscal year 1994 to the
investing public in September 1995. A hearing will be held before an
administrative law judge to determine whether the staff's allegations
are true, and, if so, whether a cease-and-desist order should be
entered against the Respondents.
_________________________________________________________________
Modified 09/20/1999
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |