LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, CESAR ODIO and MANOHAR SURANA Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-41896, Defendant: City of Miami, Florida, Cesar Odio and Manohar Surana, Plaintiff: SEC, State: FL Florida, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-41896, Securities, Act, Exchange Act, City, Public Cease-and-desist Proceedings, Odio, Exchange Commission, Miami, Florida, Surana, Alleges, Anti-fraud Provisions, United States Securities, Cease-and-desist Proceedings Pursuant, Cesar Odio, Manohar Surana, Connection, Sale, Annual Financial Report, Administrative Law Judge, Allegations, Respondents , ContentID: 120245297

Case Documents
1 1999-09-22 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 112036
1 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ACT
EXCHANGE ACT
CITY
PUBLIC CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS
ODIO
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
MIAMI
FLORIDA
SURANA
ALLEGES
ANTI-FRAUD PROVISIONS
UNITED STATES SECURITIES
CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT
CESAR ODIO
MANOHAR SURANA
CONNECTION
SALE
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
ALLEGATIONS
RESPONDENTS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

   Release No. 7741 / September 22, 1999

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 41896 / September 22, 1999

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-10022

   The United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission")
   has instituted public cease-and-desist proceedings pursuant to Section
   8A of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and Section 21C of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against the City
   of Miami, Florida (the "City"), and Cesar Odio ("Odio") and Manohar
   Surana ("Surana"), both of Miami, Florida (collectively the
   "Respondents'), to determine whether a cease-and-desist order should
   be imposed against them. The Order Instituting Public Cease-and-Desist
   Proceedings ("Order") alleges that the City, through Odio and Surana,
   violated the anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Act and Exchange
   Act in connection with the offer and sale to the public of securities
   in the form of municipal bonds issued by the City in June, August and
   December of 1995. The Order also alleges that the City, through Odio,
   violated the anti-fraud provisions when it disseminated its
   Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for fiscal year 1994 to the
   investing public in September 1995. A hearing will be held before an
   administrative law judge to determine whether the staff's allegations
   are true, and, if so, whether a cease-and-desist order should be
   entered against the Respondents.
     _________________________________________________________________

Modified 09/20/1999
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  • The United States Securities and Exchange Commission has instituted public cease-and-desist
  • The Order Instituting Public Cease-and-Desist Proceedings alleges that the City, through Odio
  • The Order also alleges that the City, through Odio, violated the anti-fraud provisions when
  • A hearing will be held before an administrative law judge to determine whether the staff's
  •    |