 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ACT ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS ESKIND EXCHANGE COMMISSION INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT INSTITUTING SCOTT ESKIND ALLEGES VIOLATIONS LAWS ANTIFRAUD PROVISIONS INJUNCTION ALLEGATIONS ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT ATLANTA GEORGIA COMMISSION FILED SUIT ALLEGING VIOLATIONS FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS PERMANENT INJUNCTION FUTURE VIOLATIONS THEREUNDER ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE EVIDENCE AFFORD RESPONDENT DEFENSES PURPOSE REMEDIAL ACTION |
Securities and Exchange Commission
Investment Advisers Act of 1940
Release No. 1838 / September 30, 1999
Administrative Proceeding
File No. 3-10053
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED AGAINST J. SCOTT ESKIND
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced that
on September 30, 1999, it issued an Order Instituting Public
Administrative Proceedings pursuant to Section 203(f) of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 against J. Scott Eskind ("Eskind") of
Atlanta, Georgia.
The Order alleges that the Commission filed suit against Eskind in
June 1997, alleging violations of the federal securities laws,
including the antifraud provisions. The Order also alleges that Eskind
consented to a permanent injunction against future violations of the
antifraud provisions, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5,
thereunder. An injunctive order was issued in January 1998.
A hearing will be scheduled before an administrative law judge to take
evidence on the staff's allegations and to afford the respondent an
opportunity to present any defenses. The purpose of the hearing is to
determine whether the allegations are true, and whether any remedial
action is appropriate in the public interest.
_________________________________________________________________
Modified 10/01/1999
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
