LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v BOBBY L. RODGERS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 33-7747, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: JUDGMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT, Defendant: Bobby L. Rodgers, Plaintiff: SEC, State: IN Indiana, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>33-7747, Investigator, Securities, Rodgers, Securities Act, Commission, Violation, Reserved Funds, Bank, Instruments, Francis, Proceeding, Respondent, Offerings, Boyd, Findings, Prime Bank, Stahl, Trading, Risk-free, Foregoing, Scienter, Caused Violations, Exchange Commission, Bobby, Sanctions, Party, Antifraud Provisions, Fraudulent, Website, Facts , ContentID: 120245254

Case Documents
1 1999-09-30 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 111993
4 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
RODGERS
SECURITIES ACT
COMMISSION
VIOLATION
RESERVED FUNDS
BANK
INSTRUMENTS
FRANCIS
PROCEEDING
RESPONDENT
OFFERINGS
BOYD
FINDINGS
PRIME BANK
STAHL
TRADING
RISK-FREE
FOREGOING
SCIENTER
CAUSED VIOLATIONS
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
BOBBY
SANCTIONS
PARTY
ANTIFRAUD PROVISIONS
FRAUDULENT
WEBSITE
FACTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   Securities Act of 1933
   Release No. 7747 / September 30, 1999

   Administrative Proceeding
   File No. 3-9896
   In the Matter of

   Bobby L. Rodgers,
   Respondent
   ORDER MAKING FINDINGS
   AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL
   SANCTIONS

   I.

   In connection with a public administrative proceeding instituted
   against him on May 11, 1999, pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities
   Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), Bobby L. Rodgers ("Rodgers," or
   "Respondent") has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer") to the
   Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), which the
   Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of this
   proceeding and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of the
   Commission or in which the Commission is a party, and without
   admitting or denying the findings contained herein, except as to
   jurisdiction, which he admits, Rodgers consents to the entry of the
   findings and remedial sanctions set forth below.

   II.

   On the basis of this Order and the Offer submitted by Rodgers, the
   Commission makes the following findings

   A. At all times relevant, respondent Bobby L. Rodgers, 55, a retired
   clothing store manager, ran a purported financial consulting business
   from his home in Germantown, Tennessee. On November 13, 1998, in an
   enforcement action unrelated to this proceeding, Rodgers consented,
   without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations, to a final
   judgment in the United States District Court for the Western District
   of Tennessee enjoining him from violating the registration and
   antifraud provisions of the Securities Act and the antifraud
   provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. , Civ. Action No.
   98-2370-GV (W.D. Tenn. Apr. 23, 1998) (JSG); Litigation Release No.
   15976 (Nov. 13, 1998).

SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Administrative Proceeding
  • Bobby L. Rodgers,
  • In connection with a public administrative proceeding instituted against him on May 11, 1999,
  • Solely for the purpose of this proceeding and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of
  • On November 13, 1998, in an enforcement action unrelated to this proceeding, Rodgers
  • the Commission and other federal agencies jointly issued an investor alert warning of
  • This case involves offerings of such bogus instruments through a website on the World Wide
  • These offerings were fraudulent in all material respects.
  • an ACC investigator expressed interest in the offerings to Stahl.
  • Stahl referred the investigator to an associate, who then put the investigator in touch with
  • On June 10, 1998, Boyd offered the investigator the opportunity to participate in a "blocked
  • This program would require the investor to maintain funds in a specific account for at least
  • Francis's information about the reserved funds program came, in turn, from Rodgers, the
  • Francis informed the investigator that the investment would be risk-free, and that gross
  • F. In addition to the foregoing, Rodgers provided Francis with documents describing another
  • The various programs described in the documents provided by Rodgers did not exist, nor were
  • A violation of Section 17occurs when a party, acting with scienter, misrepresents or omits
  • By engaging in the conduct described above, Rodgers violated and caused violations of Section
  •    |