LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v DERRICK C. JOHNSON Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 33-7749, Defendant: Derrick C. Johnson, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>33-7749, Johnson, Securities, Commission, Websites, Securities Act, Respondent, Investment, Violation, Client, Derrick, Findings, Funds, Misrepresentations, Cease-and-desist Order, Representations, Paragraphs, Exchange Commission, Administrative Proceeding, Matter, Pursuant, Prime Bank, Potential Investors, Cease, Committing, Causing, Admitting, Oregon, Internet, Mtns, Blocked Funds Trades , ContentID: 120245253

Case Documents
1 1999-09-30 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 111992
3 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 3 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
COMMISSION
WEBSITES
SECURITIES ACT
RESPONDENT
INVESTMENT
VIOLATION
CLIENT
DERRICK
FINDINGS
FUNDS
MISREPRESENTATIONS
CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER
REPRESENTATIONS
PARAGRAPHS
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
MATTER
PURSUANT
PRIME BANK
POTENTIAL INVESTORS
CEASE
COMMITTING
CAUSING
ADMITTING
OREGON
INTERNET
MTNS
BLOCKED FUNDS TRADES
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
   Release No. 7749 / September 30, 1999

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3-9893
   In the Matter of

   DERRICK C. JOHNSON
   Respondent.
   ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND
   IMPOSING CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 8A OF THE
   SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AGAINST
   DERRICK C. JOHNSON

   I.

   On May 11, 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission")
   instituted public cease-and-desist proceedings pursuant to Section 8A
   of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") against Respondent
   Derrick C. Johnson ("Johnson") to determine whether he offered "prime
   bank" securities to potential investors in violation of the federal
   securities laws, and, if so, whether to order Respondent to cease and
   desist from committing or causing violations of Sections 17(a)(1) and
   (3) of the Securities Act.

   In response to the institution of administrative proceedings, Johnson
   has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer"), which the Commission
   has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings
   and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission or
   in which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying
   the findings herein, except as to the jurisdiction of the Commission
   over him and the subject matter of the proceeding, which are admitted,
   Respondent Johnson consents to the entry of the findings and the
   cease-and-desist order set forth below.

   II.

   On the basis of this Order and the Offer, the Commission makes the
   following findings

   A. RESPONDENT

   1. Derrick C. Johnson, age 33, resides in Aloha, Oregon. Johnson is
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
  • ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 8A OF THE
  • On May 11, 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission instituted public cease-and-desist
  • Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf
  • Johnson is currently a student at George Fox University in Newberg, Oregon, where he is
  • From approximately May 1998 through February 1999, Johnson offered "prime bank" securities to
  • Johnson made several representations of fact regarding Global and the securities it was
  • Johnson claimed to offer investments in so-called medium term notes (MTNs) and blocked funds
  • The websites stated that the minimum investment was $10 million, but also claimed to offer
  • The Global websites further stated that Global had a world-wide client base and listed over
  • Each of the misrepresentations described in paragraphs 3 and 4, above, was material.
  • In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate that the Respondent be, and
  •    |