LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v SEASONGOOD & MAYER and RICHARD D. REIS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-41955, Defendant: Seasongood & Mayer and Richard D. Reis, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-41955, Seasongood, Commission, Independent Consultant, Bramble, Securities, Exchange, Recommendations, Report, Reis, Customers, Supervisory, Bearer Bonds, Accounts, Staff, Exchange Act, Respondents, Registered Representatives, United States, Review, Pursuant, Time Period, Broker-dealer, Municipal Securities, Municipal Securities Dealer, Policies, Retail Sales, Violations, Adequate Procedures, Midwest Regional Office , ContentID: 120245246

Case Documents
1 1999-09-30 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 111985
7 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 7 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMMISSION
INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT
BRAMBLE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
RECOMMENDATIONS
REPORT
REIS
CUSTOMERS
SUPERVISORY
BEARER BONDS
ACCOUNTS
STAFF
EXCHANGE ACT
RESPONDENTS
REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES
UNITED STATES
REVIEW
PURSUANT
TIME PERIOD
BROKER-DEALER
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES DEALER
POLICIES
RETAIL SALES
VIOLATIONS
ADEQUATE PROCEDURES
BUSINESS
MIDWEST REGIONAL OFFICE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   Release No. 41955 / September 30, 1999

   ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
   File No. 3 -10060
_______________________________

        In the Matter of
                                 ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC
                                 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
    SEASONGOOD & MAYER and       PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15(b),
       RICHARD D. REIS,          15B(c), AND 19(h) OF THE
                                 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
                                 OF 1934, MAKING FINDINGS AND
         Respondents.            IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
_______________________________

   I.

   The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it
   appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative
   proceedings be instituted pursuant to Sections 15(b), 15B(c), and
   19(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against
   Seasongood & Mayer ("Seasongood") and Richard D. Reis ("Reis")
   (collectively, "Respondents").

   In anticipation of the institution of these administrative
   proceedings, Respondents have submitted Offers of Settlement that the
   Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of this
   proceeding and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
   Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without
   admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to jurisdiction
   and those facts set forth in Sections II.A., II.B. and II.C., which
   are admitted by the Respondents, Respondents consent to the entry of
   this Order Instituting Public Administrative Proceedings, Making
   Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions ("Order").

   Accordingly, it is ordered that proceedings pursuant to Sections
   15(b), 15B(c), and 19(h) of the Exchange Act be, and hereby are,
   instituted.

   II.

   On the basis of the Order and the Offers of Settlement submitted by
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • SEASONGOOD & MAYER and PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15,
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest that
  • In anticipation of the institution of these administrative proceedings, Respondents have
  • On February 20, 1997, Bramble pleaded guilty in federal court to one count of interstate
  • During the relevant time period, Seasongood was also a municipal securities dealer registered
  • It is located in Cincinnati, Ohio, and employs 24 registered representatives.
  • Richard D. Reis is 52 years old and resides in Cincinnati,
  • As such, he was responsible for the day-to-day supervision of Seasongood's retail sales
  • In furtherance of his scheme, Bramble misrepresented to his customers that he would purchase,
  • he obtained funds from his customers to purchase bearer bonds or obtained bearer bonds from
  • Bramble then misappropriated these bearer bonds and converted them to cash through resale,
  • From at least 1990 through August 1996, Seasongood failed reasonably to supervise Bramble
  • failed to develop and implement effective written policies and procedures identifying and
  • failed to develop and implement adequate procedures limiting access to sensitive customer
  • Seasongood shall, prior to the close of business on the tenth business day following the
  • Seasongood shall retain, within 30 days of the date of the Order, at its expense, an
  • The Independent Consultant shall conduct a review of Seasongood's supervisory, compliance,
  • At the conclusion of that review, which in no event shall be more than 120 days after the
  • Within 150 days of the date of the Order, Seasongood shall in writing advise the Independent
  •    |