LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v RODGER E. THORNTON Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 33-7318, Defendant: Rodger E. Thornton, Plaintiff: SEC, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>33-7318, Thornton, Securities, Commission, Securities Act, Proceeding, Stat-tech, Sales, Disgorgement, Exchange Act, Pursuant, Findings, Violations, Pay Disgorgement, Fenster, Civil Penalty, Petition, Administrative Law Judge, Sanctions, Schneider, Colorado, Consultant, Shares, Stock, Payment, Enforcement, Respondent, Purpose, Broker-dealer, Matter, Sell , ContentID: 120245005

Case Documents
1 1996-08-01 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 111742
4 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
SECURITIES
COMMISSION
SECURITIES ACT
PROCEEDING
STAT-TECH
SALES
DISGORGEMENT
EXCHANGE ACT
PURSUANT
FINDINGS
VIOLATIONS
PAY DISGORGEMENT
FENSTER
CIVIL PENALTY
PETITION
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
SANCTIONS
SCHNEIDER
COLORADO
CONSULTANT
SHARES
STOCK
PAYMENT
ENFORCEMENT
RESPONDENT
PURPOSE
BROKER-DEALER
MATTER
SELL





                     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            Before The
                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Securities Act of 1933
Release No.  7318 / August 1, 1996

Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Release No. 37511 / August 1, 1996

Administrative Proceeding
File No. 3-8798

------------------------------
                              :
In the Matter of              :
                              :
RODGER E. THORNTON            :         ORDER MAKING FINDINGS
                              :         AND IMPOSING SANCTIONS
                              :
                              :
                              :
-------------------------------
                                I.

     In this proceeding ordered pursuant to Section 8A of the
Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and Sections 15(b),
19(h) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act ("Exchange Act")
respondent Rodger E. Thornton ("Thornton") has submitted an Offer
of Settlement ("Offer"), which the Commission has determined to
accept1/.  Solely for the purpose of this proceeding and any
other proceeding brought by or on behalf of the Commission or in
which the Commission is a party and without admitting or denying
the Commission's findings contained herein, except as to
jurisdiction and paragraph II.A, which he admits, Thornton
consents to the entry of this Order Making Findings and Imposing
Sanctions set forth below.

                               II.

     On the basis of the Order for Proceedings and the Offer
submitted by Thornton, the Commission finds that:2/
SNIPPETS:
  • SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Administrative Proceeding
  • In this proceeding ordered pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections
  • Solely for the purpose of this proceeding and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of
  • Schneider Securities, Inc., is a Colorado corporation registered since 1985 as a
  • 2/ Any findings herein are made pursuant to Thornton's Offer and solely for the purpose of
  • Thornton, a resident of Colorado Springs, Colorado, was a registered representative for
  • Thornton was employed as a consultant by Stat-Tech International Corp. during about November
  • From in or about October 1991 through November 1991, Thornton willfully violated Sections ed or in effect as to the said securities pursuant to the Securities Act.
  • Thornton effected or caused sales of 1,900,000
  • shares of Stat-Tech stock for Therese M. Lamb
  • the wife of Raynard M. Fenster
  • Provided that he has submitted a true, accurate and complete sworn affidavit establishing his
  • Thornton cease and desist from committing or causing violations or future violations of
  • The Division of Enforcement may, without prior notice, petition the Administrative Law Judge
  • In connection with such petition, the Administrative Law Judge may consider ordering Thornton
  • Thornton may not, by way of defense to such petition, contest the allegations or findings in
  •    |