LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v DOUGLAS L. BLAIR Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: IA-1574, Defendant: Douglas L. Blair, Plaintiff: SEC, State: OR Oregon, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>IA-1574, Wymer, Blair, Commission, Clients, Advisers Act, Proceeding, Rsi, Securities, Premiums, Pay, Transactions, Fees, Violations, Investment, Pursuant, Advisory, Schemes, Authorization, Amount, Administrative Proceeding, Findings, Accounts, Hereby, Broker-dealer, Government Securities Options, Securities Options Trading, Defraud, Instrumentalities, Payments , ContentID: 120245000

Case Documents
1 1996-08-06 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 111737
4 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
BLAIR
COMMISSION
CLIENTS
ADVISERS ACT
PROCEEDING
RSI
SECURITIES
PREMIUMS
PAY
TRANSACTIONS
FEES
VIOLATIONS
INVESTMENT
PURSUANT
ADVISORY
SCHEMES
AUTHORIZATION
AMOUNT
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
FINDINGS
ACCOUNTS
HEREBY
BROKER-DEALER
GOVERNMENT SECURITIES OPTIONS
SECURITIES OPTIONS TRADING
DEFRAUD
BUSINESS
INSTRUMENTALITIES
PAYMENTS





                     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            Before the
                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
Release No. 1574 / August 6, 1996

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-9053

___________________________________
                                   :
In the Matter of                   :    ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC
                                   :    ADMINISTRATIVE
DOUGLAS L. BLAIR                   :    PROCEEDING, MAKING
                                   :    FINDINGS AND ISSUING
                    Respondent.    :    CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER
                                   :
                                   :
                                   :
___________________________________:

                                I.

     The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems
it appropriate that a public administrative proceeding pursuant
to Section 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
("Advisers Act") be instituted against Douglas L. Blair
("Blair").

                               II.

     In anticipation of the institution of this proceeding, Blair
has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer"), which the
Commission has determined to accept.  Solely for the purpose of
this proceeding and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf
of the Commission, or in which the Commission is a party, and
without admitting or denying the findings contained herein,
except that Blair admits the jurisdiction of the Commission over
him and over the subject matter of this proceeding, Blair
consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Public
Administrative Proceeding, Making Findings and Issuing Cease-and-
SNIPPETS:
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate that a public administrative
  • In anticipation of the institution of this proceeding, Blair has submitted an Offer of
  • Solely for the purpose of this proceeding and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of
  • Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that a proceeding pursuant to Section 203of the Advisers Act be,
  • Between August 1987 and January 1993, Blair was associated with Refco Securities, Inc., a
  • Between 1987 and 1991, Steven D. Wymer, the owner of two former California-based registered
  • Between August 1987 and May 1988, Wymer conducted a scheme that resulted in his
  • As part of and in furtherance of his scheme, Wymer instructed Blair to cause RSI to pay
  • Wymer informed Blair that these payments constituted the remittance of advisory fees owed to
  • As a result of his conduct, on February 7, 1992, Wymer was permanently enjoined from future
  • On September 29, 1992, Wymer pleaded guilty to 9 felony counts and was ordered to disgorge
  • option transactions.3 RSI then deposited the balance of the premiums into the clients'
  • As a result of the conduct identified in paragraph III.C., Wymer violated Sections 206and
  • The authorization forms, drafted and reviewed by RSI's compliance officer, permitted RSI "to
  •    |