![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
FUND AUDIT WALLACE COMMISSION INSTITUTING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ALLEGES PREMIER VALUATION ACCOUNTING AUDITING ENFORCEMENT ALLEGES ENGAGEMENT DIRECTORS CALENDAR NET ASSETS ORDER ALLEGES FAILING EXCHANGE KPMG PARTNER PRACTICE STANDARDS ROCKIES FUND REPORTED NET ASSETS BID PRICE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE MATTER |
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 41240 / April 1, 1999
ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
Release No. 1121 / April 1, 1999
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-9862
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED AGAINST KPMG AUDIT
PARTNER
The Commission has instituted administrative
proceedings pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice against Carroll A. Wallace, CPA
("Wallace"), audit engagement partner with KPMG Peat
Marwick, LLP in its Denver office, charging that he engaged
in improper professional conduct by recklessly violating
professional auditing and accounting standards in connection
with his audit of the 1994 and 1995 financial statements of
the Rockies Fund, Inc. ("the Fund"), a business development
company based in Colorado Springs.
Previously, the Commission instituted administrative
and cease-and-desist proceedings against the Fund, its
president and independent members of its board of directors.
The Division of Enforcement alleged that at the end of the
Fund’s 1994 and 1995 calendar years, 40% and 21%
respectively, of the Fund’s reported net assets consisted of
securities issued directly to the Fund by Premier Concepts,
Inc. ("Premier"). At the end of the 1994 calendar year, the
Fund falsely designated these restricted securities as
unrestricted, and, at the end of both calendar years,
contrary to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
("GAAP") and the Fund’s own valuation policy, overvalued the
securities as if they could be sold at the bid price for
unrestricted securities, skewing the valuations even further
in 1995 by using the highest of three year-end bid prices.
As a result, the Fund’s reported net assets were overstated
by 27% in 1994 and 12% in 1995. The case was tried before
an Administrative Law Judge and the parties are awaiting an
initial decision. In the Matter of the Rockies Fund, Inc.,
Stephen Calandrella, Charles Powell, Clifford Thygesen and
John Power, Admin. Proc. File No. 3-9615; Rels. No. 34-
40049, IC-23229.
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |