LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SEC v CRAIG FREEMAN, WILLIAM LASHBROOK, and ROBERT SEWELL Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 34-41267, CourtCode: DIS, CourtName: FRAUD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN, Defendant: Craig Freeman, William Lashbrook, and Robert Sewell, Plaintiff: SEC, State: MO Missouri, UniqueCaseRef: SEC>34-41267, Freeman, Lashbrook, Sewell, Craig Freeman, Convictions, United States, Securities Exchange Act, Commission, Administrative Proceeding, Criminal Convictions, Alleges, Freeman Notes, Investments, William Lashbrook, Robert Sewell, Money, Laundering, Fraud, District, Indictment, Sales, Connection, Facts, Nature, Risks, Paid, Administrative Law, Judge, Allegations, Sanctions , ContentID: 120244910

Case Documents
1 1999-04-09 SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 111646
1 pages
TXT
Total Documents: 1 document , 1 page.    CAUTION.    PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A ONE PAGE CASE.
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . SEC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
LASHBROOK
SEWELL
CRAIG FREEMAN
CONVICTIONS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS
ALLEGES
FREEMAN NOTES
INVESTMENTS
WILLIAM LASHBROOK
ROBERT SEWELL
MONEY
LAUNDERING
FRAUD
DISTRICT
INDICTMENT
SALES
CONNECTION
FACTS
NATURE
RISKS
PAID
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
JUDGE
ALLEGATIONS
SANCTIONS
                   UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION



             Securities Exchange Act Release No. 41267 \ April 9, 1999

             Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-9869

             In the Matter of Craig Freeman, William Lashbrook, and

             Robert Sewell

                  The Commission announced the entry of an Order
             instituting public administrative proceedings pursuant to
             Sections 15(b) and 19(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of
             1934 (Order) against Craig Freeman, William Lashbrook
             (Lashbrook), and Robert Sewell (Sewell) based upon their
             previous criminal convictions for their respective roles in
             a $24 million nation-wide ponzi scheme.

                  The Order alleges that in June 1996, Craig Freeman was
             convicted of one count of money laundering, Lashbrook was
             convicted of one count of wire fraud  and one count of money
             laundering, and Sewell was convicted of one count of mail
             fraud in the United States District Court for the Eastern
             District of Missouri.  The criminal indictment upon which
             these criminal convictions were based alleged, among other
             things, that beginning on or about June 1, 1994, Craig
             Freeman, Lashbrook, and Sewell participated with James G.
             Freeman and others in the marketing and sales of
             approximately $24 million in unregistered promissory notes
             (the Freeman notes).  The indictment further alleged that in
             connection with the offer and sale of the Freeman notes,
             Craig Freeman, Lashbrook and Sewell, directly and
             indirectly, misrepresented and omitted to state material
             facts regarding, among other things, the nature of the
             investments, the risks involved, the use of investor
             proceeds, the commissions to be paid, and the returns on the
             investment.

                  A hearing will be held before an administrative law
             judge to determine whether the staff’s allegations against
             Craig Freeman, Lashbrook and Sewell are true, and if so,
             what sanctions, if any, are appropriate in the public
             interest against them.



SNIPPETS:
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  • Securities Exchange Act Release No. 41267 \ April 9,
  • Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-9869
  • 1934 against Craig Freeman, William Lashbrook
  • , and Robert Sewell
  • The Order alleges that in June 1996,
  • convicted of one count of money laundering,
  • convicted of one count of wire fraud and one count of money
  • fraud in the United States District Court for the Eastern
  • these criminal convictions were based alleged,
  • Freeman and others in the marketing and sales of
  • The indictment further alleged that in
  • connection with the offer and sale of the Freeman notes,
  • facts regarding, among other things, the nature of the
  • investments, the risks involved, the use of investor
  • proceeds, the commissions to be paid, and the returns on the
  • A hearing will be held before an administrative law
  • judge to determine whether the staff’s allegations against
  • what sanctions, if any, are appropriate in the public
  •    |